Reduction of renal cortical blood flow assessed by Doppler in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites.

The usefulness in cirrhotic patients of hemodynamic measurements by Doppler ultrasonography (US) is still not defined. We investigated the relationships between Doppler measurements and the severity of ascites. Portal blood flow velocity and volume, and hepatic and renal arterial resistance indexes (RI) were measured in 57 cirrhotic patients (19 without ascites, 28 with responsive ascites, and 10 with refractory ascites) and 15 healthy controls. The renal arterial RI were obtained for the main renal artery, interlobar vessels, and cortical vessels. Cirrhotic patients had decreased portal blood flow and an increased congestion index (CI). Only the CI was correlated to the severity of ascites, showing that it is also a reliable measure of the severity of portal hypertension in patients with ascites. The hepatic and renal artery RI were increased in cirrhotic patients, and the two values were correlated (r = .68; P = .00001). The RI of renal interlobar and cortical vessels were higher in patients with refractory ascites than in patients without ascites (P < .02 and P < .009), and correlated with sodium excretion rate (r = -.45; P < .003), the renin-aldosterone system, and creatinine clearance (r = -.62; P < .0002). The RI decreased from the hilum of the kidney to the outer parenchyma in healthy subjects and patients with responsive ascites, but this difference disappeared in patients with refractory ascites. This indicates that the degree of renal vasoconstriction varies in different areas according to the severity of the ascites. Cortical vessels are involved mainly in patients with refractory ascites, suggesting that the intrarenal blood flow distribution in cirrhosis tends to preserve the cortical area and that severe cortical ischemia is a feature of refractory ascites.

Prevalence and incidence of cholelithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence, the incidence and the history of cholelithiasis in liver cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 233 consecutive cirrhotic patients (193 Child A, 35 Child B and 5 Child C) were assessed for cholelithiasis by ultrasonography. Of these, 201 (those who had never had cholecystectomy) were followed-up with repeated ultrasonographies. RESULTS: The prevalence of cholelithiasis was 38% (22% gallstones and 16% previous cholecystectomies). No relationships with the usual risk factors for cholesterol gallstones, such as age, sex, body mass index, serum glucose or triglycerides, were found. On the contrary, close correlations were observed with serum albumin, bilirubin, prothrombin time and Pugh score. By multivariate analysis, only serum bilirubin was independently correlated with cholelithiasis. Histories of biliary pain were more frequent in patients with previous cholecystectomy (62% cases) than in those with gallstones (21%) and those without cholelithiasis (7%). On the contrary, complaints of dyspepsia were similar in the three groups of patients. During a mean follow-up of 34.4 +/- 0.9 months, there was a 4.9% annual rate of development of new stones in 127 patients without cholelithiasis at the first investigation. This rate is markedly higher than that reported for normal subjects in a previous survey carried out in a similar geographic area. During a mean follow-up of 31.8 +/- 1.2 months, symptoms or complications were seen in 2 out of 45 patients with initial gallstones (4.4%). The annual rate of complications was estimated to be less than 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Cholelithiasis is frequently associated with cirrhosis and the risk of developing new stones remains high during the natural history of the disease.

Long-term administration of isosorbide-5-mononitrate does not impair renal function in cirrhotic patients.

Isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Is-5-Mn), alone or combined with beta-blockers, has been proposed for prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. However, renal insufficiency, might be an important undesirable effect of this therapy, especially in patients with ascites. We assessed the changes in renal function induced in 26 cirrhotic patients by acute or chronic administration of Is-5-Mn. The acute administration of 20 mg of Is-5-Mn to 21 patients reduced mean blood pressure (83.4 +/- 2.4 vs. 92.8 +/- 3.4 mm Hg, P < .001), urine volume (5.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 8.7 +/- 1.1 mL/min, P < .05), urine sodium excretion (114 +/- 19 vs. 244 +/- 41 muEq/min, p < .001), urine potassium excretion (41 +/- 3.4 vs. 67 +/- 8.5 muEq/min, P < .001), and atrial natriuretic factor (74 +/- 10 vs. 98 +/- 12 pg/mL, P < .005). The glomerular filtration rate was decreased in the 11 patients with ascites (57 +/- 9 vs. 68 +/- 12 mL/min, P < .05), and plasma renin activity was increased in 4 ascitics. Twenty-one patients (16 from the acute study + 5 other patients) were given Is-5-Mn for 3 months at the dose of 80 mg/d. This did not affect blood pressure and renal function in patients without ascites, but reduced mean blood pressure (91.9 +/- 3.4 vs. 89.6 +/- 3 mm Hg, P < .05), urine volume (5.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.9 mL/min, P < .05), and urine sodium excretion (205 +/- 38 vs. 99 +/- 16 muEq/min, P < .01) in those with ascites. There were no changes in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow, while plasma renin activity increased in only 3 patients with ascites and 1 without. Systemic hemodynamics and renal function of cirrhotic patients, especially those with ascites, are affected adversely by acute administration of Is-5-Mn. Long-term administration of the drug is well tolerated by compensated patients and does not affect renal plasma flow nor glomerular filtration rate, but can induce hypotension and sodium retention in patients with ascites.