Comparison of 30-day outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery verus hybrid coronary revascularization stratified by SYNTAX and euroSCORE.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease is not well established. Hybrid coronary revascularization by combining the left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending artery graft and drug-eluting stents in non-left anterior descending artery territories might offer superior results compared with sole coronary artery bypass grafting or sole percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the 30-day outcomes of 381 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 301) vs hybrid coronary revascularization (n = 80). In a 2 × 2 matrix, the 2 groups were stratified by the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (≤32 vs ≥33) and the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (euroSCORE) (<5 vs ≥5). The composite endpoint (death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome) and secondary endpoints (worsening postprocedural renal function and bleeding) were determined. RESULTS: After stratification using the SYNTAX and the euroSCORE, the preoperative characteristics were similar within the 4 groups, except for the ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE. The hybrid coronary revascularization patients were older (77 vs 65 years, P = .001). The postoperative outcomes using combined SYNTAX and the euroSCORE stratification showed a similar rate of the composite endpoint for all groups except for patients with ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE (0% for the coronary artery bypass grafting group vs 33% for the hybrid coronary revascularization group, P = .001). An analysis of the secondary endpoint showed similar results across all groups, except for in the ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE group, in which bleeding (re-exploration for bleeding and transfusion >3 packed red blood cell units per patient) was 44% in the hybrid coronary revascularization group vs 11% in the coronary artery bypass grafting group (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid coronary revascularization is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in many patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. However, in high-risk patients with complex coronary artery disease (≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE), coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to hybrid coronary revascularization.

Improved midterm outcomes for type A (central) pulmonary emboli treated surgically.

OBJECTIVES: We propose a simplified anatomic classification for pulmonary emboli that algorithmically differentiates those who might be best treated with surgical pulmonary embolectomy (type A) from those best treated medically (type B). We hypothesized that patients with type A pulmonary emboli treated with immediate surgical embolectomy demonstrate superior long-term survival compared with patients with type A pulmonary emboli treated medically. METHODS: Patients admitted between 2002 and 2008 with a diagnosis of pulmonary emboli made based on computed tomographic angiographic imaging (n = 779) were analyzed. Computed tomographic angiographic images were reviewed in a blind fashion, and anatomic classification of emboli was made. Patients with central thrombus, defined by location medial to the lateral mediastinal boundaries (ie, involving the main, primary, or both branch pulmonary arteries), were classified as having type A pulmonary emboli (n = 107), whereas those with peripheral pulmonary emboli located beyond these boundaries were classified as having type B pulmonary emboli (n = 672). Four patients with type A pulmonary emboli treated with catheter embolectomy were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients with type A pulmonary emboli, 15 (14%) were treated with immediate surgical pulmonary embolectomy, and 88 (85%) were treated medically. Patients with type A pulmonary emboli treated surgically had similar 30-day mortality compared with those treated medically (13% vs 17%, P = .532). At a mean of 24 ± 18 months' follow-up (range, 1-82 months), survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for patients with type A pulmonary emboli treated surgically was significantly better than that in the patients with type A pulmonary emboli treated medically (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with type A pulmonary emboli, immediate surgical intervention appears to offer superior midterm survival compared with medical treatment alone. Although the medical and surgical groups were substantially different and the differences might have affected survival, this simplified classification for pulmonary emboli might help direct optimal treatment strategies.