Changes in radiographic abnormalities in organ donors: associations with lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Only 20% of organ donors are considered suitable for lung transplantation. No extensive study exists that has evaluated changes in thoracic radiographic abnormalities in organ donors. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of radiographic abnormalities on successful transplantation. METHODS: In a retrospective survey of 110 organ donors, chest radiographs (N = 417) taken during the initial 24 hours after admission and just before organ harvest were evaluated for 9 radiographic criteria, radiographic diagnoses and clinical characteristics and their association with lung transplantation. RESULTS: Initial lung densities were present in 37% of lungs; there were bilateral infiltrates in 25% of cases. During evaluation (69.7 +/- 60 hours), 38% of right lungs and 28% of left lungs improved radiographically. Up to 51% of lungs with initial infiltrates resolved completely. Worsening of lung infiltrates was more common in the non-transplant group (p = 0.02); however, improvement in densities was not associated with transplantation (p = 0.6). Multivariate analysis determined that moderate and severe lung densities (OR 7.68, p = 0.01; OR 10.8, p = 0.004) and bilateral infiltrates (OR 4.79, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of rejection for transplantation. With densities removed from the model, the number of abnormal diagnoses on the final films was an independent predictor of rejection for transplantation (OR 3.23, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: More than 33% of proposed organ donors initially have lung infiltrates, with >33% showing improvement or resolution, but this improvement does not impact on procurement. Multiple abnormal radiographic diagnoses also contribute to transplant rejection.

Temporal changes in left ventricular systolic function in heart donors: results of serial echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Heart donor availability continues to limit cardiac transplantation rates and many donor hearts are not transplanted because of left ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine whether intensive donor management results in improved left ventricular systolic function as measured by serial echocardiography. METHODS: Using the California Transplant Donor Network Database, all donors who underwent serial echocardiography during donor management (from 1996 to 2000) were identified. The study includes those donors with ejection fractions <50% or regional wall-motion abnormalities shown on the initial echocardiogram. The database provides clinical data describing donor characteristics, treatments, and recipient outcomes. The mean ejection fractions at the first and second echocardiograms were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: In 13 of 16 subjects, initial ejection fractions were <50% and improved in 12 subjects after intensive donor management. Seventy-five percent of the donors received high-dose corticosteroids, 15 of 16 received dopamine, and none received thyroid hormone. In 12 subjects, the donor hearts were transplanted with a survival rate of 92% at an average follow-up of 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that in some cases, intensive donor management is associated with improved donor left ventricular function. Prospective studies are indicated to determine the predictors of improved donor left ventricular dysfunction and of recipient survival when sub-optimal hearts are transplanted.