Meningeosis Neoplastica in Patients with Glioblastoma: Analysis of 36 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Meningeosis neoplastica is a rare manifestation of high-grade gliomas and is usually associated with a devastating outcome. The aim of this bicenter series was to investigate the clinical course and outcome of patients with meningiosis neoplastica. METHODS: This case series included patients in whom surgery was performed for World Health Organization grade IV primary and secondary glioblastoma (GBM) at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany between 2009 and 2021 and Burdenko Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia between 2012 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were manifestation of clinical and neuroradiologic signs of leptomeningeal, ependymal, or spinal dissemination of GBM at various time points during the course of the disease. RESULTS: Meningeosis neoplastica was found in 36 patients. Nine patients developed spinal metastases and 12 ependymal dissemination and 15 patients had a leptomeningeal manifestation of high-grade glioma. The median age of patients at first diagnosis of primary tumor was 56 years. Typical symptoms were headache, nausea, vomiting, and acute paraplegia. The median overall survival was 11 months and progression-free survival was 8 months. Meningeosis neoplastica developed a median 2 months after the initial tumor diagnosis. Salvage therapies included ventriculoperitoneal shunting, decompression of spinal metastases, and spinal radiation therapy. The median time between meningeosis manifestation and death was 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Meningeosis neoplastica is a rare manifestation of GBM. It has a poor prognosis. The overall survival after the manifestation of meningeosis was barely longer than 3 months. Salvage therapies did not improve the outcome in our patient cohort.

The Role of 3D-pCASL MRI in the Differential Diagnosis of Glioblastoma and Brain Metastases.

Purpose: The first aim of this study was to compare the intratumoral and peritumoral blood flow parameters in glioblastomas and brain metastases measured by pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling MRI (3D pCASL). The second aim of this study was to determine whether pCASL could aid in identifying the source of brain metastases. Materials and Methods: This study included 173 patients aged 12 to 83 years (median age-61 years), who were observed at the National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery. All patients underwent preoperative MRI with pCASL perfusion. Thereafter patients were operated on and received histological diagnosis. No patients received preoperative chemo or radiotherapy. Results: The values of maximum and normalized intratumoral blood flow were significantly higher in the group with gliblastoma than in the group with brain metastases: 168.98 + -91.96 versus 152.1 + -173.32 and 7.6 + -8.4 versus 9.3 + -5.33 respectively (p <0.01). However, ROC analysis showed low AUC specificity and sensitivity (0.64, 70%, 60% for mTBF and 0.66, 77%, 62% for nTBF). Peritumoral blood flow parameters were also higher in the glioblastoma group (29.61 + -22.89 versus 16.58 + -6.46 for mTBF and 1.63 + -1.14 versus 0.88 + -0.38 for nTBF, respectively; p <0.01). ROC analysis showed the following measurements of AUC, specificity, and sensitivity (0.75, 68%, 73% for mTBF and 0.77, 58%, 91% for nTBF). Regarding pCASL and various histological subsets of brain metastases, the study found statistically significant differences between the lung and melanoma metastases and the lung and kidney metastases. ROC analysis gave the following values for lung and melanoma metastases: AUC-0.76, specificity-75%, and sensitivity-73% for mTBF; 0.83, 67%, and 93% respectively, for nTBF. For lung and kidney metastases: AUC-0.74, specificity-70%, and sensitivity-93% for mTBF; 0.75, 70%, and 93% respectively, for nTBF. Conclusions: pCASL could aid in differential diagnosis between glioblastoma and brain metastases. Measurement of peritumoral blood flow demonstrates higher specificity and sensitivity than with intratumoral blood flow. Moreover, pCASL provides the ability to distinguish lung metastases from kidney and melanoma metastases.

Prediction of Intraoperative Fluorescence of Brain Gliomas: Correlation between Tumor Blood Flow and the Fluorescence.

INTRODUCTION: The prediction of the fluorescent effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in patients with diffuse gliomas can improve the selection of patients. The degree of enhancement of gliomas has been reported to predict 5-ALA fluorescence, while, at the same time, rarer cases of fluorescence have been described in non-enhancing gliomas. Perfusion studies, in particular arterial spin labeling perfusion, have demonstrated high efficiency in determining the degree of malignancy of brain gliomas and may be better for predicting fluorescence than contrast enhancement. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between tumor blood flow, measured by ASL, and intraoperative fluorescent glow of gliomas of different grades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumoral blood flow was assessed in 75 patients by pCASL (pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling) within 1 week prior to surgery. In all cases of tumor removal, 5-ALA had been administered preoperatively. Maximum values of tumoral blood flow (TBF max) were measured, and normalized tumor blood flow (nTBF) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 76% of patients had significant contrast enhancement, while 24% were non-enhancing. The histopathology revealed 17 WHO grade II gliomas, 12 WHO grade III gliomas and 46 glioblastomas. Overall, there was a relationship between the degree of intraoperative tumor fluorescence and ASL-TBF (Rs = 0.28, p = 0.02 or the TBF; Rs = 0.34, p = 0.003 for nTBF). Non-enhancing gliomas were fluorescent in 9/18 patients, with nTBF in fluorescent gliomas being 54.58 ± 32.34 mL/100 mg/s and in non-fluorescent gliomas being 52.99 ± 53.61 mL/100 g/s (p > 0.05). Enhancing gliomas were fluorescent in 53/57 patients, with nTBF being 170.17 ± 107.65 mL/100 g/s in fluorescent and 165.52 ± 141.71 in non-fluorescent gliomas (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tumoral blood flow levels measured by non-contrast ASL perfusion method predict the fluorescence by 5-ALA; however, the additional value beyond contrast enhancement is not clear. ASL is, however, useful in cases with contraindication to contrast.