Correlates of breast cancer screening among low-income, low-education Latinas.

INTRODUCTION: This paper discusses the factors associated with breast cancer screening among low-education, low-income Latinas. BACKGROUND: These data were collected as part of a breast cancer educational intervention study aimed at this population. The objective of the larger study was to evaluate multimedia methods as an appropriate medium for educating this population of Latinas about breast cancer. METHODS: The study was designed as a field experiment with a pre and posttest design. A total of 1,197 individuals participated in the study, and these were all self-identified Latinas above the age of 40 years who fit the screening criteria of low income and education levels. Of these, 583 individuals provided the baseline (pretest) data on mammogram attitudes, knowledge, and intentions analyzed in this paper. RESULTS: Our results indicate that breast cancer screening knowledge and having a regular doctor were significant factors in ever having had a mammogram and having had a recent mammogram in this sample of low-income, low-education Latinas. Age affected the odds of ever having had a mammogram, but not a recent mammogram. CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward mammography, insurance status, and demographic factors such as foreign birth were not significant predictors of mammography screening in this study.

Screening mammography in an integrated health care system: the Kaiser permanente experience.

In this paper, we describe the attributes of a comprehensive approach to breast cancer screening possible in an integrated health care system. We define an integrated health care system as one in which comprehensive preventive and medical care is provided to a defined population, by a defined panel of providers, and in which this care can be tracked using automated electronic data systems. Guided by the Pathways Conceptual Framework, it is possible to identify and systematically address (through research and interventions) the multiple predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors at the individual and organizational level associated with each step along the screening process. This framework is helpful as both a planning and an evaluation tool, in identifying places in the screening and follow-up process that could benefit from concerted quality improvement efforts and in guiding an evaluation of those efforts. We describe examples from research and organizational programmatic efforts, and use the framework to point to additional areas for further investigation and potential organizational intervention. These examples use a variety of research methods, impact the breast cancer screening pathway in different places, and therefore show how it is possible to approach the broad issue of reduction of breast cancer mortality from multiple perspectives. Integrated health care systems, unlike more traditional academic settings, are well suited to supporting this full spectrum of research while also providing the context for its application.

The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of 2 reminder interventions to increase the use of screening mammograms and Papanicolaou (Pap) smears among female members of a large health maintenance organization. METHODS: Seven thousand seventy-seven female health maintenance organization members (aged 50-74 years with no prior mammogram in the previous 30 months or aged 20-64 years with no prior Pap smear in the previous 36 months) were randomized to receive one of the following: a letter inviting them to make an appointment for a mammogram or a Pap smear; in addition to the letter, a reminder manually placed in the patient's medical chart alerting providers of that member's need for screening; or their usual care. RESULTS: Compared with women who did not receive the reminder letter, women who did receive the letter were more likely to obtain mammograms (16.0% vs 25.5%, respectively; P < .001) or Pap smears (9.1% vs 19.5%, respectively; P < .001) in the 6 months following their entry into the study. Compared with women who received only the reminder letter, women who received a reminder letter and had a reminder placed in their medical chart were more likely to obtain mammograms (26.5% vs 30.9%, respectively; P = .02) and marginally more likely to receive Pap smears (19.5% vs 22.8%, respectively; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of patient reminder letters as a first step in a mammography or Pap smear screening outreach program. Further research is needed to evaluate a cost-effective provider reminder system and additional outreach strategies directed to women who do not use health care services.

Cost of care for cancer in a health maintenance organization.

The direct costs of medical care for cancer are examined at Kaiser Permanente (KP) in Northern California. Use data from July 1987 through June 1991 were obtained from KP automated files for all 21,977 KP patients in the Bay Area SEER registry with cancer at one of seven cancer sites. Medical charts were reviewed for a stratified sample of 886 patients. Costs were estimated for initial, continuing, and terminal care, and for all person time within 15 years of diagnosis, by stage at diagnosis. From diagnosis until death or 15 years, long-term costs attributable to cancer were as follows: breast, $35,000; colon, $42,000; rectum, $51,000; lung, $33,000; ovarian, $64,000; prostate, $29,000; and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), $48,000. The utilization and cost results reported here may be useful in assessing the cost-effectiveness of cancer prevention and control programs, in adjusting capitation rates and budgets, and in estimating the aggregate medical care costs attributable to cancer.

Improving the effectiveness of breast self-examination in the early detection of breast cancer: a selective review of the literature.

This paper selectively reviews the literature on breast self-examination. The evidence for the use of silicone models to teach lump detection skill and for individual instruction is evaluated, and recommendations are made for the NP's role in teaching breast self-examination.

Breast self-examination: improving competence and frequency in a classroom setting.

We conducted a prospective study of 459 women to determine if a one-session class in breast self-examination (BSE) can improve competence and frequency. Women who attended the class were randomly assigned to one of two groups. We assessed three areas of competence of BSE in one group immediately before the class, in the other group immediately after the class, and in both groups at follow-up one year later. Of the 459 women who attended the class, 286 returned for the one-year follow-up. All three areas of competence measured showed significant improvement in the group tested immediately after the class compared with the group tested just before the class. Competence scores at the one-year follow-up remained twice as high as those before the class although there was a decrease in competence from just after the class. Younger women proved more competent in performing BSE than did older women. At one year, participants further reported performing BSE nearly twice as often as before the class. We conclude that competent BSE can be learned and frequency of BSE can be increased from a one-session class.