Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0281841, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37040359

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Face masks are low-cost, but effective in preventing transmission of COVID-19. To visualize public's practice of protection during the outbreak, we reported the rate of face mask wearing using artificial intelligence-assisted face mask detector, AiMASK. METHODS: After validation, AiMASK collected data from 32 districts in Bangkok. We analyzed the association between factors affecting the unprotected group (incorrect or non-mask wearing) using univariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: AiMASK was validated before data collection with accuracy of 97.83% and 91% during internal and external validation, respectively. AiMASK detected a total of 1,124,524 people. The unprotected group consisted of 2.06% of incorrect mask-wearing group and 1.96% of non-mask wearing group. Moderate negative correlation was found between the number of COVID-19 patients and the proportion of unprotected people (r = -0.507, p<0.001). People were 1.15 times more likely to be unprotected during the holidays and in the evening, than on working days and in the morning (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.17, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AiMASK was as effective as human graders in detecting face mask wearing. The prevailing number of COVID-19 infections affected people's mask-wearing behavior. Higher tendencies towards no protection were found in the evenings, during holidays, and in city centers.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Inteligência Artificial , Máscaras , Pandemias , Tailândia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...