A systematic review of primary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate.

Background: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of prostate cancer. The pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, treatment options, and prognosis are uncertain and underreported. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in April 2022 through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. We reviewed cases of LCNEC developed either from de novo or transformation from prostate adenocarcinoma and summarized the relevant pathophysiological course, treatment options, and outcomes. Results: A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 70.4 (range 43 87 years old) from 18 studies were included in this review. 13 patients were diagnosed with de novo LCNEC of the prostate. 12 patients were from the transformation of adenocarcinoma post-hormonal therapy treatment. Upon initial diagnosis, patients diagnosed with de novo prostatic LCNEC had a mean serum PSA value of 24.6 ng/ml (range: 0.09-170 ng/ml, median 5.5 ng/ml), while transformation cases were significantly lower at 3.3 ng/ml (range: 0-9.3 ng/ml, median 0.05 ng/ml). The pattern of metastasis closely resembles prostate adenocarcinoma. Six out of twenty-three cases displayed brain metastasis matching the correlation between neuroendocrine tumors and brain metastasis. Three notable paraneoplastic syndromes included Cushings syndrome, dermatomyositis, and polycythemia. Most patients with advanced metastatic disease received conventional platinum-based chemotherapy with a mean survival of 5 months. There was one exception in the transformation cohort with a somatic BRCA2 mutation who was treated with a combination of M6620 and platinum-based chemotherapy with an impressive PFS of 20 months. Patients with pure LCNEC phenotype have worse survival outcomes when compared to those with mixed LCNEC and adenocarcinoma phenotypes. It is unclear whether there is a survival benefit to administering ADT in pure pathologies. Conclusion: LCNEC of the prostate is a rare disease that can occur de novo or transformation from prostatic adenocarcinoma. Most patients present at an advanced stage with poor prognosis and are treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens. Patients who had better outcomes were those who were diagnosed at an early stage and received treatment with surgery or radiation and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). There was one case with an exceptional outcome that included a treatment regimen of M6620 and chemotherapy.

Cardiac toxicity in patients with lung cancer receiving thoracic radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat locally-advanced and metastatic lung cancer, which can lead to severe immunogenic-related cardiotoxicities. We assessed the risk of cardiotoxicity in ICI-treated lung cancer patients with or without cardiac radiation from thoracic radiotherapy. Methods: Retrospective data was collected on Stage III-IV lung cancer patients who received ICIs between 2015 and 2018. All cardiotoxicities associated with ICI were assessed in correlation with the timing of radiotherapy (RT) in relation to ICI, and the mean RT heart dose. The rate of cardiac events in relation to RT timing and heart dose was compared using multiple logistic regression including the Framingham risk score and steroid use prior to ICI therapy. Results: Of 194 ICI-treated patients evaluated, 55.2% (n=107/194) patients had received thoracic RT at a median dose of 60.4 Gy (range, 15-75). Cardiotoxicities such as non-ST elevated myocardial infarction and new onset supraventricular tachycardias were observed in 13 (12.2%) of those who had thoracic RT versus 9 (10.3%) who did not (p=0.87). 38 patients who received RT concurrently with ICI did not develop any cardiotoxicity whereas 14.1% (n=22/156) of those who did not receive concurrent RT developed cardiotoxicities (univariate, p=0.030; multivariate, p=0.055). There were no significant differences in the mean heart RT dose, Framingham risk score, and steroid treatment between patients that received concurrent RT with ICI versus non-concurrent RT/ICI. Conclusion: ICI-related cardiotoxicities were not significantly associated with patients who received concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in this retrospective review. Further validation of prospective studies is needed to confirm these results.

Safety of Baricitinib 4 mg for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of baricitinib 4 mg at 24 weeks for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Multiple databases were searched from inception up to November 26, 2019 for randomized controlled trials comparing baricitinib 4 mg with placebo for the treatment of moderate to severe RA. The safety outcomes of interest were the incidence of serious adverse events, adverse events leading to study discontinuation, all infections, and serious infections. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for safety outcomes. The Cochrane tool was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: This analysis included four randomized controlled trials with 3106 patients. For serious adverse events, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.09 (0.76-1.57). For adverse events leading to study discontinuation, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.41 (0.94-2.11). For all reported infections, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.24 (1.10-1.40), For serious infections, pooled RR (95% CI) was 0.97 (0.51-2.57). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA taking 4 mg baricitinib daily did have an increased risk of infections; however, the incidence of serious adverse events, adverse events leading to study discontinuation, or serious infections were not significantly different in patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg compared with placebo.