Effects of amphetamine and/or L-dopa and physiotherapy after stroke - a blinded randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: Major therapeutic advances in the rehabilitation of subacute stroke are lacking. A promising approach is treatment with facilitating drugs like amphetamine or levodopa in combination with physiotherapy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trail, the effect of 10 sessions with either 20 mg of D-amphetamine, 100 mg of L-dopa or 10 mg of D-amphetamine + 50 mg of L-dopa combined with physiotherapy during a 2-week period was investigated in 25 patients admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit. Motor function (Fugl-Meyer score) and activities of daily living (Barthel's index) were assessed. RESULTS: All patients improved significantly over the intervention period. Drug-treated patients did not show any additional increase in motor function or ADL. CONCLUSION: It is feasible and safe to perform larger clinical trials with this type of four-arm design. However, the lack of significant effects could be because of type, dosage, and time of drugs as well as the physical intervention strategy.

A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of amphetamine and physiotherapy after stroke.

Major therapeutic advances in the rehabilitation of subacute stroke are lacking. One promising approach is treatment with amphetamine in combination with physiotherapy so as to promote motor function. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the effect of 10 sessions with 10 mg of amphetamine combined with physiotherapy during a 5-week period was investigated in 39 geriatric patients who had been admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit. Motor function (Fugl-Meyer motor performance score) and activities of daily living (ADL; Barthel's index) were assessed at baseline and at the end of treatment. All patients improved significantly over the intervention period. Amphetamine-treated patients did not show any increase in motor function or ADL as compared to the control group. Rehabilitation with amphetamine at this dosage and interval, combined with physiotherapy, did not promote motor recovery or functional capacity in patients suffering from stroke.

Can the site of brain lesion predict improved motor function after low-TENS treatment on the post-stroke paretic arm?

OBJECTIVES: Previous reports suggest that afferent stimulation improves arm motor function in patients suffering from stroke. The aim of this pilot study was to test the hypothesis that the brain lesion location determines the response to low-frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (Low-TENS) therapy. DESIGN: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 14 patients who had previously received Low-TENS on the paretic arm after stroke. METHODS: MR images were classified with two different methods. First, lesions in the cortical and the subcortical areas were registered. Secondly, any change in a described periventricular white matter (PVWM) area was recorded. Interactions between the lesion site, as detected by MRI, and response to Low-TENS treatment were analysed. RESULTS: Arm motor function after Low-TENS treatment in relation to lesion in different brain areas showed that absence of lesions in the PVWM area increased the possibility for improved motor capacity after afferent stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The site of lesion may play a role in prognosis/outcome after Low-TENS treatment but this hypothesis should be further tested in a larger prospective study.

Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether stroke patients with initial increases in arm motor recovery following low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (low TENS) treatment go on to show long-term benefits. Also whether the same therapy results in long-term improvements in motor function, spasticity or activities of daily living (ADL). DESIGN: A three-year follow-up study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight stroke patients, who had participated in a randomized trial of daily treatment with low-frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (low TENS) on the paretic arm for three months starting 6-12 months after stroke. OUTCOMES: Fugl-Meyer Motor Performance Scale for evaluation of changes in arm motor function. A 6-point Ashworth Scale to measure spasticity. Barthel Index to evaluate performance in ADL. RESULTS: Motor function of the paretic arm had deteriorated in both treatment and control groups. Increased spasticity was seen in both groups. ADL score remained at a similar level in the low TENS group, whereas the control group had deteriorated during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: Low TENS stimulation started 6-12 months after stroke may not have a specific effect on arm motor function years after completion of treatment.

Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm.

The object of this study is to determine if the functional motor capacity of the paretic extremity can be improved by stimulation with low intensity low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (Low-TENS), started 6-12 months after a stroke. Forty-four patients who had a paretic arm as a consequence of their first stroke were included and randomly assigned to either a treatment group (n = 26) or a control group (n = 18). Patients in both groups received physiotherapy at a day-care center, usually twice a week. The treatment group received, in addition, Low-TENS for 60 min, five days a week for three months. Results showed that motor function increased significantly in the treatment group, compared to controls. The Low-TENS did not decrease either pain or spasticity. It is concluded that stimulation by means of Low-TENS could be a valuable complement to the usual training of arm and hand function in the rehabilitation of stroke patients.