Team-Based Learning Experiences of Fourth-Year Pharmacy Students in a South African University.

Objective. To determine fourth-year pharmacy students' learning experiences with team-based learning (TBL) at a South African university. Methods. A survey composed of biographical data and quantitative questions focusing on student learning experiences was sent to students. There were 183 (91.5%) students who completed the survey. Results. Students had a positive experience with TBL and found it valuable and more worthwhile than traditional lecture methods, regardless of their initial negative perception of TBL. Students enjoyed working in multi-cultural, mixed gender teams. Conclusion. TBL is an effective teaching strategy to simulate the reality of health professions where practitioners are required to work in a team. TBL should be offered in more courses in health professions curriculum in South Africa to strengthen and promote efficient health care delivery.

Long-term tolerability of tramadol LP, a new once-daily formulation, in patients with osteoarthritis or low back pain.

INTRODUCTION: Tramadol hydrochloride is a centrally acting analgesic, which possesses opioid agonist properties and activates monoaminergic spinal inhibition of pain. An oral, once a day, sustained release formulation of tramadol is thought to be advantageous compared with immediate release preparations as it prevents plasma peaks associated with increased side-effects of the drug. It may also improve compliance. The purpose of the study was to assess the long-term safety of a new sustained-release formulation of tramadol (tramadol LP) in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis and in patients with refractory low back pain. STUDY DESIGN: The design was a phase III, open, multicentre, international, tolerability study with tramadol LP at a dose titrated by the patient between 100 and 400 mg once daily, according to the intensity of pain. The treatment was administered for a continuous period of 4 weeks followed by an intermittent intake of 5 months in 204 patients. The safety criteria for evaluation were recording of adverse events, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, radiography, global tolerability assessed by the patient and the investigators. RESULTS: Long-term use of tramadol LP was reasonably well tolerated. Most of the reported adverse events were expected and occurred within the first month of treatment. Roughly half of the patients (49%) reported adverse events, of which 66% were related to treatment. Gastrointestinal events (nausea and vomiting) were the most frequent. Serious adverse events were reported in 6.4% of patients, from which only two cases were related to treatment. There was no sign of tolerance development and the percentage of patients presenting withdrawal symptoms after the end of treatment was low (6%). CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with tramadol LP once daily is generally safe in patients with osteoarthritis or refractory low back pain.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a new oral sustained release dosage form of tramadol.

AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetic profile of a new modified release formulation of tramadol (Tramadol LP 200 mg, SMB Technology, Marche-en-Famenne, Belgium) with that of an immediate release capsule (Topalgic) 50 mg, Grünenthal, Aachen, Germany) after single and multiple dosing and to assess the potential effect of food on its relative bioavailability. METHODS: The first study had an open, single-dose, three-treatment, three-period, six-sequence, randomised, crossover design with at least a five-day wash-out. The second study had an open, steady-state, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, randomised crossover design with at least a seven-day wash-out. Both studies contained 30 healthy subjects. Both enantiomers of tramadol and O-demethyl-tramadol (the only active metabolite of tramadol) were assayed in the plasma using an LC-MS/MS method. AUC infinity, AUCt, Cmax, Tmax, and T1/2 were estimated. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate anova, the Wilcoxon nonparametric method or Friedman's nonparametric anova where appropriate. RESULTS: Tramadol had a significantly lower Cmax and longer Tmax than the conventional formulation. Thus, the mean (+/- sd) Cmax of tramadol were 646 +/- 192 and 300 +/- 94 ng ml-1 for Topalgic 4 x 50mg and Tramadol LP 200 mg, respectively (95% confidence interval on the difference expressed as a percentage 42-51). AUC of tramadol from both formulations was comparable (similar AUC infinity and AUCt). Thus, the mean AUC infinity of (+/-)tramadol obtained after multiple dosing were 4611 +/- 1944 and 5105 +/- 2101 ngh ml-1 after Topalgic 4 x 50mg and Tramadol LP 200 mg, respectively (95%CI 102-123%). We also demonstrate that the pharmacokinetics of the drug are not influenced by the intake of food. Thus, the mean AUC infinity of (+/-) tramadol were 5444 +/- 1637 and 5169 +/- 1580 ngh ml-1 after Tramadol LP 200 mg given in the fasting and fed states, respectively (95%CI = 88-103%). CONCLUSIONS: The new sustained release form of tramadol exhibits adequate properties for once a day administration. Furthermore, its pharmacokinetic profile is not affected by the intake of food.