[Case-control study on three spinal rotation manipulations for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different spinal rotation manipulations for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: From September 2011 to April 2013,180 patients diagnosed as lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into seat fixed rotation group (A), lateral position rotation group (B) and supine position rotation group (C) by using a digital table. Finally 10 patients were excluded and dropped, 170 patients were included in the study. There were 57 patients in group A, 57 patients in group B and 56 patients in group C. Baseline demographic characteristics of patients, clinical findings and indexes of health status had no statistically differences among three groups (P > 0.05). The manipulation was performed every other day, and the treatment duration for all patients was 3 weeks. Body pain (BP), Physical function (PF) in SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and adverse reactions were observed statistically 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, one year and two years after finishing treatment. RESULTS: BP, PF scores in 3 groups were significantly improved and ODI scores were significantly lower than those before treatment and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); However, there was no significant difference among three groups in the BP, PF and ODI scores (P > 0.05). There were no obvious and serious adverse reactions among these groups. CONCLUSION: Based on the theory of dislocation of bone joints in TCM, three kinds of spinal rotation manipulations can be used safely for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, and the efficacy was similar.

PTPN12 inhibits oral squamous epithelial carcinoma cell proliferation and invasion and can be used as a prognostic marker.

Protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 12 (PTPN12) has been recognized as a tumor suppressor gene that may inhibit tumor growth. However, PTPN12 expression in oral squamous carcinoma (OSCC) has not been studied. We showed reduced expression of PTPN12 in OSCC tissues. Decreased PTPN12 expression was significantly associated with clinical stage of the disease (P < 0.01). Moreover, reduction in PTPN12 correlated with the overactivation of STAT3. PTPRD negatively related to STAT3 phosphorylation (R = -0.535). Low expression of PTPN12 and high level of phosphorylation of STAT3 correlated with poor prognosis. Overexpression of PTPN12 inhibited proliferation and migration in OSCC cells. PTPN12 was associated with STAT3 and induced STAT3 dephosphorylation. Moreover, our results suggested that PTPN12 might function through binding and dephosphorylation of STAT3. Therefore, PTPN12 is a potential marker for prognosis of OSCC.

[Application of surface electromyography in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with traditional spinal balanced therapy].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the values of surface electromyography (sEMG) in the treatment of adolescent idiophathic scoliosis (AIS) with non-surgical therapy. METHODS: From October 2011 to May 2012, the data of 33 patients with AIS underwent traditional spinal balanced therapy were analyzed. There were 14 males and 19 females with an average age of (15.40 +/- 3.01) years,ranging in Cobb angle from 13 degrees to 40 degrees, course of disease more than 3 months. X-rays showed 21 cases were type C and 9 cases were type S. Preoperative and postoperative 6 months, Cobb angle, the ratio of averaged electromyography paramete (AEMG), security of treatment were observed. RESULTS: Thirty cases (90.9%) accomplished the treatment and detection. No harmful effects to vital sign was found and no fracture, dislocation, apopsychia, infection of pin hole was found. There was positive correlation between the ratio of AEMG and Cobb angle (P = 0.003). The ratio of AEMG decreased after treatment,and indicated the improvement of myosthenic otherness. CONCLUSION: sEMG can be used as a objective examination in evaluating difference of muscle electricity activity on both concaved and convex sides for patients of AIS, so it is a qualified objective examination for effectiveness evaluation and assessment aggravation risk, and has great value in clinic.

[Randomized controlled trial on manipulation for the treatment of cervical vertigo of high flow velocity type].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of manipulation and traction combined with Nimodipine on the blood flow velocity of vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) in cervical vertigo of high flow velocity,and to evaluate clinical therapeutic effects between two methods. METHODS: From March 2008 to Feburary 2009,70 patients who were diagnosed as high flow velocity of cervical vertigo were randomly divided into treatment group (35 cases) and control group (35 cases). Among 70 patients, 32 were male and 38 were female. The age ranged from 21 to 45 years with an average of 37.6 years. The disease course ranged from one day to two years with an average of 12.6 days. Patients of the treatment group were treated with manipulation for total three weeks, three times once week. The patients in the control group were treated with traction (weight ranged from 5 to 6 kg, 20 minutes each time, once every other day) and Nimodipine for total three weeks (three times each day, and with a dose of 40 mg each time). After three weeks, the changes of flow velacity of VBI and score before and after treatment were observed using transcranil Doppler (TCD) and Evaluation Scale for Cervical Vertigo. After six weeks, the therapeutic effects were assessed. RESULTS: The mean velocity in left vertebral artery (LVA), right vertebral artery (RVA) and basilar artery (BA) were obviously lower than those before treatment in two groups (P < 0.01). The LVA, RVA and BA of the treatment group was lower than those of control group after 3 weeks (P < 0.01). There was significant difference in vertigo score after treatment between the two groups. The improvement rate of double-sides sign in X-ray image and the therapeutic effects of treatment group was superior to that of control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The effect of manipulation on flow velocity of VBA is superior to that of traction combined with Nimodipine, and there are better therapeutic effects in treating cervical vertigo of high flow velocity in comparison with traction combined with Nimodipine. But there are more higher demands for manipulation's application.