Parvimonas micra-induced prosthetic valve endocarditis: a challenging case report and literature review.

Parvimonas micra, a gram-positive anaerobic bacterium, has garnered increased attention due to its role in infective endocarditis. We present a challenging prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by Parvimonas micra in a patient with a complex cardiac history involving multiple surgeries. The case highlights the difficulties in diagnosis and treatment, emphasizing the importance of advanced diagnostic techniques, including metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Additionally, it underscores the need for heightened vigilance regarding oral symptoms and the potential risk of bacteremia in post-valvular surgery patients. This report contributes to a better understanding of Parvimonas micra-associated endocarditis and its unique characteristics.

Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 22 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Although the safety and feasibility of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and bone marrow stem cell (BMSC) transplantation have been established, the effectiveness of this approach compared with CABG alone remains controversial. The aim of this updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure. METHODS: A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using studies sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane literature databases to compare patients who received isolated CABG (CABG group) and BMSC transplantation with CABG (BMSC group). 22 studies were included. RESULTS: A total of 22 relevant publications with 820 patients were included. 432 patients received BMSC transplantation with CABG and 388 patients received isolated CABG. Compared with the CABG group, the BMSC transplantation group exhibited an improvement in the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (mean difference (MD) = 3.87%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.93-5.80%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present evidence suggests that autologous BMSC transplantation for patients undergoing CABG appears to be associated with an improvement in LV function compared with CABG alone. However, heterogeneity in the data suggests that patients respond differently to this therapy. Further research is needed to understand these differences.

Valve replacement or repair in native mitral valve infective endocarditis-Which is better? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Native mitral valve infective endocarditis (IE) plagues patients and surgeons alike because of its high mortality and recurrence rates as well as poor prognosis. Mitral valve repair (MVP) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) are two main surgical methods. However, the question of which benefits patients more remains controversial. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically review the two approaches, focusing on the early survival rate and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted using studies sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane literature databases to compare MVP and MVR, with data extracted for baseline characteristics, mortality, survival, recurrent endocarditis, and valve reoperation. Risk ratio (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) values were calculated, and publication bias was tested. RESULTS: A total of 17 relevant publications with a total population of 3759 patients, with 1180 patients having undergone MVP and 2579 patients having undergone MVR, respectively, were analyzed. Patients who underwent MVP may benefit from a lower risk of early mortality (RR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.66; p < .00001), a higher long-term survival rate (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81; p < .001; I2 = 0%), and a lower risk of recurrence (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40-1.09; p = .10; I2 = 0%). However, a similar risk of reoperation was observed for both groups (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.36-2.91; p = .96; I2 = 43%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that MVP may lead to better outcomes compared to MVR. Among patients with mitral valve IE, MVP can reduce in-hospital mortality, improve long-term survival, and has a lower risk of recurrent endocarditis. As a result, MVP may be suitable as a primary treatment choice and should be considered whenever possible in most IE patients.