Effect of finerenone on cardiovascular events in kidney disease and/or diabetes: a meta analysis of randomized control trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of finerenone on cardiovascular events in Kidney Disease and/or Diabetes. METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from the inception dates to December 20, 2021 in order to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of finerenone on cardiovascular events in Kidney Disease and/or Diabetes, without language restriction. This meta-analysis collected data from 7 randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effect of finrrenone in 15,618 patients with kidney disease and/or diabetes. Risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Inconsistency among trial results was assessed by I2 statistic. The main endpoints included death from cardiovascular causes, death from any cause, incidence of myocardial infarction, rate of heart failure, hospitalization for any cause, rate of total advent events and study-drug-related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 7 randomized controlled trials involving 15,618 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The outcomes of this meta-analysis presented that finerenone significantly reduced the death from any cause (95% CI 0.82-0.99; P = 0.031), risk of heart failure (95% CI 0.67-0.92; P = 0.002) among patients with kidney disease and/or diabetes when compared to control group. Besides, finerenone could not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular, myocardial infarction and hospitalization for any cause among patients with kidney disease and/or diabetes (p > 0.05). In terms of safety, finerenone shared the same risk of total advent events with placebo among patients with kidney disease and/or diabetes (p > 0.05). However, finerenone had higher risk of study-drug-related advent events than placebo among patients with kidney disease and/or diabetes (95% CI 1.27-1.48; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with kidney disease and/or diabetes, treatment with finerenone resulted in lower risk of death from any cause and heart failure than placebo. However, the study-drug-related advent events also increased significantly at the same time.

Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill patients: The PRISMA study of a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety of balanced crystalloids and saline among critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: The Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from the inception dates to May 17, 2020 in order to identify randomized controlled trials which evaluated the safety of balanced crystalloids and saline in critically ill patients. The primary outcome was major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30). The second outcomes included 30-day mortality, ICU mortality, In-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, creatinine highest before discharge (mg/dl) and needs for renal replacement therapy (RRT). RESULTS: A total of nine randomized controlled trials involving 19,578 critical ill patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The outcomes of this meta-analysis showed that balanced crystalloids treatment shared the same risk of MAKE30 with saline treatment among critical ill patients [RR = 0.95; 95%CI, 0.88 to 1.01; Z = 1.64 (P = .102)]. The clinical mortality which included 30-day mortality [RR = 0.92; 95%CI, 0.85 to 1.01; Z = 1.78 (P = .075)], ICU mortality [RR = 0.92; 95%CI, 0.83 to 1.02; Z = 1.67 (P = .094)] and In-hospital mortality [RR = 0.93; 95%CI, 0.71 to 1.21; Z = 0.55 (P = .585)] were similar between balanced crystalloids treatment and saline treatment among critical ill patients. Patients who received balanced crystalloids treatment or saline treatment needed the same length of ICU stay [WMD = 0.00; 95%CI, -0.09 to 0.10; Z = 0.09 (P = .932)] and hospital stay [WMD = 0.59; 95%CI, -0.33 to 1.51; Z = 1.26 (P = .209)]. Critical ill patients who received balanced crystalloids treatment or saline treatment had the same level of creatinine highest before discharge [WMD = 0.01; 95%CI, -0.02 to 0.04; Z = 0.76 (P = .446)] and needs for RRT [RR = 1.04; 95%CI, 0.75 to 1.43; Z = 0.21 (P = .830)]. Similar results were obtained in subgroups of trials stratified according to the age of patients (children or adults). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with saline, balanced crystalloids could not reduce the risk of MAKE30, 30-day mortality, ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality, could not reduce the length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, the level of creatinine highest before discharge and the needs for RRT among critical ill children and adults. Therefore, it was still too early for balanced crystalloids to replace normal saline among critical ill patients.