Vital sign differences between septic patients with tetraplegia and paraplegia.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a leading preventable cause of death in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Individuals with tetraplegia may exhibit different signs and symptoms of infection compared to those with paraplegia. In this study, we examine differences in vital signs (VS) and mental status between septic patients with tetraplegia and paraplegia with the goal of improving early identification of sepsis in this population. SETTING: Veterans hospital in Washington, USA. METHODS: Participants consisted of 19 patients with tetraplegia and 16 with paraplegia who were transferred from an SCI Service to a higher level of care with sepsis between June 1, 2010 and June 1, 2018 (n = 35). We compared VS between patients with tetraplegia and paraplegia at baseline and during sepsis including temperature, heart rate (HR), and blood pressure as well as presence/absence of altered mental status (AMS). RESULTS: While there were no significant VS differences between groups at baseline, septic patients with tetraplegia had lower maximum temperature (38.2 °C versus 39.2 °C, p = 0.003), lower maximum HR (106 versus 124 beats/minute, p = 0.004), and more frequent AMS compared to septic patients with paraplegia (79% versus 31%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Patients with tetraplegia may not be able to mount fever and tachycardia to the same degree as patients with paraplegia and may be more prone to developing AMS during sepsis. These findings suggest that changes to VS parameter cut-offs may improve sensitivity and be useful in identifying sepsis earlier in the tetraplegic population.

A safe and effective multi-day colonoscopy bowel preparation for individuals with spinal cord injuries.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy with polypectomy is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but poor bowel cleansing limits the diagnostic yield of the procedure. Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently have suboptimal bowel cleansing with standard pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation regimens. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a multi-day inpatient bowel preparation regimen in a population of patients with SCI. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: VA Puget Sound SCI Center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with SCI (n = 53) who underwent inpatient colonoscopy at the VA Puget Sound from July 12, 2013 to February 12, 2015. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, tolerance of full bowel preparation, pre- and post-bowel preparation electrolyte values, adverse events, and adequacy of bowel cleansing were abstracted. RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of patients had a cervical level of injury and the majority were either American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A (41%) or D (43%). The full bowel preparation was tolerated by 91% of inpatients. In those with pre- and post-bowel preparation laboratory testing, there were small, but statistically significant decreases in serum calcium and phosphate. No patient had symptoms associated with electrolyte abnormalities or required treatment. Five out of 53 inpatients experienced autonomic dysreflexia (AD) during bowel preparation. Eighty-nine percent of patients had adequate bowel cleansing at colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a safe and effective inpatient bowel preparation regimen in a SCI population. The regimen was associated with mild, asymptomatic hypophosphatemia and hypocalcemia. AD was an uncommon event, predominantly occurring in patients who experienced frequent AD episodes at baseline.

Colorectal cancer screening in patients with spinal cord injury yields similar results to the general population with an effective bowel preparation: a retrospective chart audit.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart audit. OBJECTIVES: To compare adequacy of colonoscopy bowel preparation and diagnostic findings between persons with SCI receiving an extended inpatient bowel preparation and the general population. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA. METHODS: We reviewed an electronic database of all colonoscopies performed at a tertiary Veterans Affairs medical center between 7/12/13 and 15/10/15. Patients with SCI received a multi-day bowel preparation with magnesium citrate, and 8-10 liters of polyethylene glycol-3350 and electrolyte colonic lavage solution (PEG-ELS) over two and one half days. The control population received a standard bowel preparation consisting of magnesium citrate and 4 liters of PEG-ELS over 1 day. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-five patients were included in the study, including 85 patients with SCI. Average risk screening was a more common colonoscopy indication in patients with SCI vs. the control population (24 vs. 13% p = 0.03). There was no difference in adequacy of bowel preparation (87 vs. 85%, p = 0.73) or adenoma detection rate (55 vs. 51%, p = 0.59) when comparing patients with SCI with the control population. No difference in polyp histopathology was detected (p = 0.748). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that an extended bowel preparation for patients with SCI produces similar bowel preparation results and diagnostic yield when compared to patients without SCI undergoing colonoscopy.