RESUMO
PURPOSE: Image-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for prostate cancer patients; however, some patients still experience acute and late genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Studies have shown that urethral dose is associated with the incidence and severity of GU toxicity. Therefore, a technique that can further spare the urethra while ensuring adequate target coverage is highly desirable. Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) designs, such as rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT), offer ideal dosimetry theoretically but are challenging to implement clinically due to the need for high precision in moving the treatment delivery mechanisms synchronized with the source loading. In this study, we propose a novel relatively easy-to-implement solution based on the direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) design concept, which does not involve moving parts and works effectively with the ubiquitous 192Ir source. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The popular Varian VS2000 (VS) and GammaMedPlus (GMP) 192Ir sources, with outer diameters of 0.6 mm and 0.9 mm, respectively, were simulated using the GEANT4 Monte Carlo (MC) simulation code. The novel DMBT needle concept consists of a 14-gauge nitinol needle, which houses a platinum shield inside. A single groove, consistent with the outer diameter of each source, was incorporated inside the platinum shield to accommodate the HDR source. The maximum thickness of the shield was 1.1 mm (0.8 mm) for the VS (GMP) source. To evaluate the effectiveness of the DMBT needle concept in reducing urethral dose, 6 patient cases were studied and DMBT plans were created by replacing two needles close to the urethra with the DMBT needles. The dosimetric comparisons between the DMBT and reference clinical plans were done by assessing the dose-volume histogram (DVH) planning criteria for the target coverage and organs-at-risk. RESULTS: The MC results showed that the use of the novel DMBT needle design with the VS source (GMP source) could reduce the dose by 49.6% (39.2%) at 1 cm from the needle behind the platinum shield, as compared to the unshielded side. Additionally, when using the same DVH planning criteria as the original plan, the DMBT plan with the VS (GMP) source reduced the maximum urethral dose by 10.3% ± 5.6% (8.1% ± 5.0%) and 17.7% ± 14.2% (16.6% ± 13.3%) for 0 mm and 2 mm margins, respectively, while maintaining equivalent V90% and D100 target coverage. CONCLUSION: The novel DMBT technique offers a promising clinically implementable solution for sparing urethra, particularly in pre-apical region, without compromising the target coverage or increasing treatment time.
