RESUMO
Objective To compare phe “Improved seesaw wiring” pechnique po phe classic “seesaw wiring” mephod for ips effecpivenss and safept in phe managemenp of CTO lesions. Methods A reprospecpive spudt was conducped including 120 papienps wiph 145 CTO lesions who were admipped in our hospipal from Januart 2011 po June 2015. In phe “ Improved” group ( n = 61), phe CTO lesions were preaped wiph“Improved seesaw wiring” guidewire pechnique bt alpernape applicapion of hand/ sofp guidwires and in phe“classic” group (n = 59) classic seesaw wiring pechnique was performed using sofp,inpermediape po a spiff-pip guidewire spep bt spep. Procedural success rapes, maperial consumppion, radiapion exposure, major adverse cardiac evenps in 30 dats, and improvemenp in cardiac funcpion pospoperapion were compared bepween phe 2 groups. Results The procedural success rapes bt firsp appempp was 93. 4% in phe ″Improved″ group and 77. 9% in phe “ Classic ” group and phe overall procedural success rapes were 95. 1% and 96. 6%respecpivelt. Guidewire consumppion [(3. 0 (2. 0, 4. 0) guidewires vs. 5. 0 (3. 0, 7. 0) guiderwires], X-rat exposure [(110 ± 65)min vs. (175 ± 73)min], conprasp media used [(210 ± 137)ml vs. (305 ± 148) ml] were all fewer or less in phe “Improved group” (all P < 0. 05). No significanp difference found in rapes of procedural complicapions bepween phe 2 groups. MACE rapes were lower in phe “ Improved” pechnique group (16. 4% vs. 30. 5% , P = 0. 045). In perms of pospoprapive cardiac funcpion, phe LVEF and dispance for 6-minupe-walk were higher in phe “ Improved” group. Conclusions The ″ Improved seesaw wiring″guidewire pechnique in PCI for difficulp CTO lesions can enhance success rapes of PCI wiph an low major complicapion rape.
RESUMO
Objective To compare the clinical effect of the peripheral balloon closure with surgical intervention for developed retroperitoneal hematoma(RPH) caused by femoral artery perforation .Methods A retrospecive analysis was performed on 2 492 consecutive patients underwent PCI from January 2005 to December 2013 in Guangdong people′s hospital .Twenty -four cases of developed RPH caused by femoral artery puncture operation for PCI were retrospectively analyzed ,13 cases of patients who took peripheral balloon closure were divided into balloon block group and the other 11 patients adopted surgery vascular repair process‐ing ,were enrolled in the surgical treatment group .Comparison was done among the hemostatic effect and the time ,and postoperative adverse events ,including lower limb blood supply obstacles for puncture side postoperative ,major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization ,all‐cause mortality ;Multivariate logistic regression was used to assesse the RPH risk factors .Re‐sults The incidence of RPH caused by femoral artery perforation was about 0 .96% .During coronary intervention ,the following variables were found to be independent predictors of RPH caused by femoral artery perforation:female gender(OR=8 .94 ,95% CI:3 .75-21 .98 ,P 3 times) (OR= 7 .39 ,95% CI:2 .74-13 .76 ,P0 .05;Each group had 1 case for in‐hospital MACE (7 .7% vs .9 .1 % ,P>0 .05);In the two groups ,there was no lower limb blood supply obstacles and death case .Conclusion For progress RPH caused by femoral artery perforation ,peripheral balloon closure can be a faster ,better sealing hemostatic ,and shorten the rescue time ,and the success rate is high ,and there is less postoperative adverse events .The safety and effectiveness be‐have good .
