Evaluation of the Retrospective LACE Index in Predicting the Risk of Readmission in Patients with Hereditary Angioedema in an Emergency Department.

This study aimed to calculate the LACE index in patients who admitted to the emergency department (ED) with hereditary angioedema (HA) diagnosed and to predict recurrent admissions of patients. In this single-center study, patients aged 18 or higher who were admitted to the ED diagnosed with HA were included over a 12-year period. 35 patients diagnosed with code E88.0 were evaluated according to electronic file records. The number of admissions to the ED in the last 6 months was 2. The LACE index was 4, and risk was 71.4%. The patients admitted to the hospital in the last 30 days had a higher rate of admission to the hospital in the last 6 months (p < 0.001). The LACE index at admission predicted 30 days admission with (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI (0.56-0.91)) acceptable discrimination. The LACE index and the number of admissions in the last 6 months included in the evaluation can be considered predictive in recurrent ED admissions of HA patients. However, the distribution of LACE-risk groups is no priority. Therefore, the low-, medium-, or high-risk level of LACE index values should be not taken into consideration in readmission of such patients.

Emergency department management after the 2020 Aegean Sea - Izmir earthquake.

BACKGROUND: This article aims to provide an up-to-date resource on disaster management by reporting about the destructive fea-tures of the earthquake that occurred on October 30, 2020, and about the hospital and emergency service organization during a pandemic. METHODS: This study was carried out with a multicentered, cross-sectional retrospective design on the victims of the 2020 Aegean Sea - Izmir earthquake. Local ethics committee approval was obtained. The data obtained by obtaining permission from two hospitals and ambulance services (transport data) located in the region where earthquake-related destruction was most prominent were evalu-ated. Patient data including demographic data, time of arrival to the emergency department, duration of stay under the debris, triage codes (green: not urgent, slightly injured; yellow: may be delayed, injured; red: critically injured; and black: dead), type of injuries, dura-tion of stay in the emergency department, crush syndrome, rhabdomyolysis, need for invasive procedures (e.g., surgery and dialysis), intensive care admission, hospital admission, and discharge were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 313 patients (60.4% females) were included in the study according to the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the participants was 38.0±21.0 years, with the youngest being a 6-month-old baby and the oldest a 91-year-old individual. Approximately 41.5% of the earthquake victims presented to the emergency department within the first 3 h of the earthquake, and patients with yellow triage code were the most common in the 1st h. Further, 35.2% of the patients who were rescued from under the debris were discharged alive. Four patients were discharged alive after being rescued from under the debris 24 h following the earthquake, of whom three were rescued after >48 h (longest duration, 91 h). Further, 32 (15.9%) patients who survived upon presentation to the emergency department had rhabdomyolysis, 4 (1.9%) underwent hemodialysis in the emergency department due to acute renal failure, and 8 (3.8%) underwent other emergency operations such as fasciotomy and amputation. In total, 122 patients died and 191 patients were discharged from the hospitals. Furthermore, 139 patients were discharged from the emergency department, 15 were admitted to the intensive care unit, 41 were hospitalized in the relevant clinics, and 112 were directly transferred to the morgue following preliminary evaluation. CONCLUSION: Emergency services should be ready in terms of accurate registration, correct data entry, correct triage assignment, sufficient resources, adequate team, sufficient equipment, and adequate treatment areas for disasters such as earthquakes. Further, ade-quate disaster trainings should be provided, feasible disaster relief plans should be prepared, and regular exercises should be conducted.

An Evaluation of Firearm Injuries in the Emergency Department.

Introduction Firearm injuries are a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. Our study aims to evaluate the injury patterns, results of imaging studies, treatment methods, outcomes, and mortality rates of patients who were admitted to the emergency department with firearm injuries. Methods Our study was designed as a retrospective descriptive study. To this end, adult patients who were admitted to our hospital with gunshot wounds between January 1, 2017, and July 31, 2021, were screened. The files of 527 patients who were admitted with gunshot wounds were analyzed. A total of 30 patients were excluded from the study due to missing data. Statistical analyses were performed using the data of a total of 497 patients. Independent variables of the study included sex, age, systolic blood pressure (SBD), diastolic blood pressure (DBD), pulse, respiratory rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, range of shot, injury site, X-ray, cranial CT, thorax CT, abdominal CT, and extremity CT angiography findings, and the need for treatment and referral. Mortality was the dependent variable of the study. A logistic regression model was created to predict factors affecting the survival of the patients who were admitted to the emergency department with gunshot wounds and to identify the independent variables affecting survival. A p-value of <0.05 was considered sufficient for significance. Results The majority of patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to gunshot wounds were male and the median age of the patients was 32 years (18-70 years). The comparison of the descriptive characteristics with respect to survival revealed that the systolic and diastolic blood pressures and GCS scores of the deceased patients were significantly lower than those of the survivors. The rate of shooting at short range was significantly higher in the deceased patients when compared to that of the survivors. In addition, the rate of the need for surgical intervention and the incidence of pneumocephaly in cranial CT were higher in the deceased patients than in the survivors. Significantly higher rates of deceased patients required referral to neurosurgery and thoracic surgery clinics than survivors. The patients who were referred to the thoracic surgery clinic had an increased death rate by 29-fold and the patients who were referred to the thoracic surgery clinic had an increased death rate by about nine-fold. On the other hand, the probability of death was reduced by about half when the GCS scores of the patients were higher. Discussion We evaluated GCS in our patient group and determined a significantly lower score in the patients who did not survive, which agrees with the findings of other studies. Patients with higher SBD and DBD showed a higher probability of survival, which agrees with the results in other studies. Most patients were shot from their extremities and none had died while the death rate was significantly higher in the patients who suffered injuries to the head or neck. The patients with pneumocephalus had a very low chance of survival. Compared to wound care and dressing, patients who received surgical treatment were more likely to die as these patients had more critical injuries. Conclusion Although most injuries were to the extremities, there were no mortalities in the cohort of patients referred to orthopedics. The patients who suffered injuries to the head/neck had the highest mortality rate.

Computed tomography vs. magnetic resonance imaging in unstable cervical spine injuries.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the role of computed tomography (CT) in identifying missed unstable blunt cervical injuries. METHODS: Patients admitted to the emergency department between June 2014 and June 2018 with a diagnosis of blunt cervical trauma were included in this study. All participants underwent cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after an initial cervical CT investigation. All imaging results were reviewed, and decisions were taken by the consensus of a team consisting of an emergency medicine specialist, a neuroradiologist, and a neurosurgeon. Other variables included age, sex, the Glasgow Coma Scale, medical comorbidities, multi-trauma, neurological deficits, accompanying intracranial hemorrhage, extremity fractures, and the mechanism of the injury. RESULTS: Data for 195 patients were analyzed. The mean (±standard deviation) age of the participants was 47.34±21.90 years, and 140 (71.8%) were males. Eighteen patients (9.2%) were below age <18. The most frequent mechanism of injury was fall from height (n=100; 51.3%). Using MRI as the gold standard, the sensitivity of CT in diagnosing unstable cervical injury was 77.7% (95% CI [67.1-86.1]), while its specificity was 100.0% (95% CI [59.0-100.0]). CONCLUSION: Although computed tomography is relatively good in diagnosing unstable cervical injuries, its sensitivity in detecting positive cases is not as successful. Thus, the use of MRI in patients with an unstable injury seems to be warranted.