Biophysical Characterization of SG2NA Variants and their Interaction with DJ-1 and Calmodulin in vitro.

SG2NA was first discovered as nuclear autoantigen in lung and bladder cancer patient. It was named SG2NA as its expression increases during S to G2 phase of cell cycle. SG2NA/Striatin3 was classified as a member of Striatin family along with Straitin and Zinedin due to its structural and functional relatedness. At the molecular level, SG2NA is characterized by the presence of multiple protein-protein interaction domains viz., a caveolin binding motif, a coiled coil structure, Ca2+-calmodulin binding domain and a large WD-40 repeat domain in the same order from amino to the carboxyl termini. Analysis of secondary structures of 87 and 78 kDa SG2NA isoforms showed characteristic combinations of α-helix, ß-structure, ß-turns and random coil; suggesting of effective refolding after denaturation. This study for the first time establishes the structural differences between the two prevalent isoforms of SG2NA. Recently we observed that DJ-1 interacts with variants of SG2NA both in vitro and in vivo. The SG2NA isoforms purified from inclusion bodies showed the different secondary structure conformations, stability and interaction pattern for their interacting partners (DJ-1 and calmodulin) which imparts functional diversity of SG2NA. The SG2NA isoforms showed significant differential binding affinity to DJ-1 and Calmodulin.

Molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations based structural analysis of the SG2NA protein variants.

BACKGROUND: SG2NA is a member of the striatin sub-family of WD-40 repeat proteins. Striatin family members have been associated with diverse physiological functions. SG2NA has also been shown to have roles in cell cycle progression, signal transduction etc. They have been known to interact with a number of proteins including Caveolin and Calmodulin and also propagate the formation of a multimeric protein unit called striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase. As a pre-requisite for such interaction ability, these proteins are known to be unstable and primarily disordered in their arrangement. Earlier we had identified that it has multiple isoforms (namely 35, 78, 87 kDa based on its molecular weight) which are generated by alternative splicing. However, detailed structural information of SG2NA is still eluding the researchers. RESULTS: This study was aimed towards three-dimensional molecular modeling and characterization of SG2NA protein and its isoforms. One structure out of five was selected for each variant having the least value for C score. Out of these, m35 kDa with a C score value of -3.21 was the most poorly determined structure in comparison to m78 kDa and m87 kDa variants with C scores of -1.16 and -1.97 respectively. Further evaluation resulted in about 61.6% residues of m35 kDa, 76.6% residues of m78 kDa and 72.1% residues of m87 kDa falling in the favorable regions of Ramchandran Plot. Molecular dynamics simulations were also carried out to obtain biologically relevant structural models and compared with previous atomic coordinates. N-terminal region of all variants was found to be highly disordered. CONCLUSION: This study provides first-hand detailed information to understand the structural conformation of SG2NA protein variants (m35 kDa, m78 kDa and m87 kDa). The WD-40 repeat domain was found to constitute antiparallel strands of ß-sheets arranged circularly. This study elucidates the crucial structural features of SG2NA proteins which are involved in various protein-protein interactions and also reveals the extent of disorder present in the SG2NA structure crucial for excessive interaction and multimeric protein complexes. The study also potentiates the role of computational approaches for preliminary examination of unknown proteins in the absence of experimental information.