Do surveillance intervals in patients with more than five adenomas at index colonoscopy be shorter than those in patients with three to four adenomas? A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is controversy about the surveillance interval after colonoscopy when 5-10 adenomas have been found on index colonoscopy. This study aimed to investigate the risk of colorectal neoplasm (CRN) according to the number of adenomas at index colonoscopy. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted at 10 university hospitals in Korea. We included 1394 patients with ≥ 3 adenomas at index colonoscopy. The risk of advanced CRN was compared according to the number of adenomas (intermediate risk group, 3-4 small adenomas or at least one ≥ 10 mm, and high risk group, ≥ 5 small adenomas or ≥ 3 at least one ≥ 10 mm). RESULTS: Overall, 164 (11.8%) developed an advanced CRN after a mean of 4.0 years from baseline colonoscopy. The 3-year and 5-year risk of advanced CRN was 2.1% (95% CI 2.09-2.11) and 14.4% (95% CI 14.36-14.44) in intermediate risk group and 3.2% (95% CI 3.19-3.21) and 23.3% (95% CI 19.15-19.25) in high risk group (P = 0.01). Having ≥ 5 adenomas (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.23, P = 0.01) detected at index colonoscopy was a significant risk factor for developing advanced CRN. CONCLUSIONS: Although risk of advanced CRN in patients with 5-10 adenomas was significantly higher than that in patients with 3-4 adenomas, the cumulative risk at 3 years was low at 3.2%. Thus, we suggest that a 3-year surveillance interval might be appropriate for the patients with 5-10 adenomas, and further prospective studies are needed to investigate whether more intensive surveillance is needed in this group.

The Role of Subcortical Regions in Speech Production

BACKGROUND: Speech production requires accurate coordination of the speech musculature, and is dependent upon cooperation among cortical and subcortical structures. Multiple subcortical structures, including the basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum, are involved in several parallel and segregated cortical-subcortical-cerebellum circuits. These circuits serve critical functions in integrating neural networks that modulate speech motor behaviors. Previous studies on speech disorders linked to subcortical lesions have been limited to perceptual evaluations of speech in patients with lesions. However, more recent studies using neuroimaging have confirmed the results of the lesion studies and provided further evidence of the important contributions of the subcortical structures to speech motor control. METHODS: We reviewed recent research literature on both behavioral and functional neuroimaging to reveal the role of subcortical structures in speech production. A review of this topic was conducted by searching the literature and electronic databases. RESULTS: Based on numerous articles, we found that the basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum make different contributions to the modulation of speech-related variables. The cerebellum is the structure that is most strongly associated with speech rate, complexity, and timing. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the subcortical structures may play critical functions in speech production. The function of each structure involves the stimulation of cortical regions through the neural circuits and neurotransmitters. Thus, the function of the subcortical structures should be understood within the paradigm of neural networks.