Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 2024 Aug 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39214399

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastric polyposis is common in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome. However, the incidence and risk factors for gastric cancer (GC) are unclear. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of GC and associated risk factors in a large FAP population. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with FAP undergoing upper endoscopy at Mayo Clinic from 1989 to 2023. Cumulative incidence of GC (95% CIs) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival approaches. Associations of clinical characteristics with development of GC were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 337 patients underwent 2502 endoscopies with a median of 10.4 years (IQR, 3.9-17.2) of endoscopic surveillance. At any time during surveillance, 294 patients (87%) had gastric polyps; 200 (59%), fundic gland polyps; 116 (34%), low-grade dysplasia (LGD); and 11 (3.3%), high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Among these, only 6 patients (2%) developed GC-5 with HGD (3 [50%] on previous endoscopy and 2 [33%] at the time of cancer diagnosis) and 1 (16%) with LGD on previous endoscopy. The 10-year cumulative incidence of GC is 0% with no polyps, 1% with polyps, 6% with LGD, 11% with polyps ≥2 cm, and 20% with HGD. Both HGD and polyps ≥2 cm had a strong association with the development of GC (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although the overall risk of GC in FAP is low, outcomes remain poor. GC can be predicted by endoscopic findings and specific GC surveillance guidelines are imperative to improve detection rates and guide timely intervention.

2.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 69: 101898, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749577

RESUMO

While the endoscopic management of surgical complications like leaks, fistulas, and perforations is rapidly evolving, its core principles revolve around closure, drainage, and containment. Effectively managing these conditions relies on several factors, such as the underlying cause, chronicity of the lesion, tissue viability, co-morbidities, availability of devices, and expertise required to perform the endoscopy. In contrast to acute perforation, fistulas and leaks often demand a multimodal approach requiring more than one session to achieve the required results. Although the ultimate goal is complete resolution, these endoscopic interventions can provide clinical stability, enabling enteral feeding to lead to early hospital discharge or elective surgery. In this discussion, we emphasize the current state of knowledge and the prospective role of endoscopic interventions in managing surgical complications.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Drenagem , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
VideoGIE ; 8(8): 301-303, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37575140

RESUMO

Video 1Video of EGD showing deflation of balloon and removal.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA