Imaging data suggesting acute pyelonephritis in the kidney graft: report of five cases with atypical clinical presentation.

Acute pyelonephritis is a common complication of kidney transplantation, occurring in up to 1% of grafts. Diagnosis is mainly clinical and atypical presentations have seldom been reported. The diagnostic role of imaging techniques has not been defined. Five cases of acute graft pyelonephritis are reported (three kidney, two pancreas-kidney grafts). The patients (median age 48 years) comprised three females and two males. Median post-transplant follow-up was 3 months, with three patients having predisposing factors for diabetes and one for an enteric bladder. None of the patients presented the 'classic' diagnostic tetrad (i.e. fever, positive urine cultures, low urinary tract symptoms and serum creatinine increase); although, at diagnosis, two of five patients presented with fever, one had increased creatinine levels and one had positive urine cultures. Of note, three patients had leucocyte casts at urinary sediment analysis, thus raising clinical suspicion. Renal ultrasounds were negative in all patients. Renal (99m)Tc-MAG3 (mercaptoacetyltriglycine) scintigraphy, which was used for the definition of kidney function impairment (one patient) or because of the presence of urinary casts (three patients), or after the biopsy diagnosis to locate the parenchymal lesions (one patient), was positive in all patients. The presence and pyelonephritic origin of the parenchymal lesions was confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance or computed tomography scans. Acute graft pyelonephritis may develop in the absence of a full-blown clinical picture. Smouldering symptoms may occur in the presence of large perfusion deficits. (99m)Tc-MAG3 scintigraphy could be an important diagnostic tool in such cases.

Drug use and kidney donation: what are high-risk behaviors today?

BACKGROUND: "Social risk behaviors" are usually considered as contraindications for organ donation. The organ shortage, however, necessitates expansion of the donor pool. Reconsideration of the policy toward substance abusers may be important. Opinions of the overall population may be of use to define this cultural-sensitive issue. METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire on organ donation, including opinions on drug use (cannabis and cocaine), was administered to various groups of the general public and caregivers: high school students (liceo classico: 59 students, median age 18 years; istituto tecnico: 108, age 17); first- and fourth-year medical school (77, age 19; 46, age 22); continuing medical education (44, age 32); third-year nursing school (31, age 23); "senior citizen university" (51, age 63). RESULTS: Cannabis use was mainly accepted for kidney donation (48.6% yes, 26.6% no, 29.8% uncertain/blank), but cocaine use was not (22.1% yes, 44.2% no, 33.7% uncertain/blank). In the univariate analysis, opinions differed according to age, sex, and belonging to the health care teams upon multivariate analysis being a member of the health care team was the strongest predictor of responses (P<.01). CONCLUSION: It is difficult to define social risk behaviors. Since opinions are important for organ donation, further studies and discussion are needed to periodically analyze our policies.

Is male homosexuality still a cultural taboo for kidney donation?

BACKGROUND: Among the so-called social risk behaviors, male homosexuality is probably one of the most interesting and difficult taboos. Because of changing attitudes of the general population toward irregular sexual behaviors, often considered as markers of unhealthy life styles, there is a need to reconsider at least the most important one-homosexuality. METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire included opinions on homosexuality with respect to kidney donation: Would you consider a male homosexual as a kidney donor? If you were on dialysis, would you accept a kidney from a homosexual donor? This instrument was administered to various groups of the general public and caregivers: high school students (Liceo Classico: 59 students, median age 18 years; Istituto Tecnico: n=108, median age 17); first and fourth year of medical school (n=77, age 19; 46, age 22); continuing medical education (n=44, age 32); third year of nursing school (n=31, age 23); "senior citizen university" (n=51, age 63). RESULTS: Male homosexuality was well accepted for kidney donation (71.6% yes, 9.6% no, 18.8% uncertain/blank). However, the opinions were different among the groups with male students of a technical institute showing discrimination against male homosexuals. In the univariate analysis, opinions differed according to age, gender, and belonging to the health care team. In the multivariate analysis, the latter was the strongest predictor (P<.01). The specific threats for the health are not well known, even among the caregiver population. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to define the role of homosexuality among the so-called social risk behaviors. Negative attitudes existed in some subsets of the population.

CKD patients and erythropoietin: do we need evidence-based informed consent?

BACKGROUND: Consent to therapy is increasingly requested in the form of ''informed consent''. OBJECTIVE: To validate an evidence-based informed consent form for erythropoietin (EPO) therapy and to evaluate patient opinions about the informed consent approach. METHODS: An evidence-based informed consent form was developed as part of the Evidence-Based-Medicine course at the Medical School of Turin, Italy. It was validated by anonymous questionnaires (0-10 analogical scales and open answers) administered to patients at different stages of CKD (19 pre-ESRD, 26 hemodialysis, 12 transplant patients) attending an outpatient unit of the University of Turin, to 8 nurses, and to 26 medical students. RESULTS: All individuals filled in the questionnaire. Interest in a detailed explanation of the therapy was high (median 9), as was comprehension (median 9), with no differences between patients with regard to disease stage (pre-ESRD vs. RRT) or educational level. Prior knowledge of the therapy was affected by the educational level (p=0.013 for the advantages and p=0.004 for the side effects) and the professional role (patients vs caregivers: p=0.009 for the advantages and p<0.001 for side affects); patient knowledge of the advantages (median 6) tended to increase as the disease progressed (p=0.015). The most common response by patients was that informed consent was necessary for all drugs (35.1%); 73.1% of the caregivers considered it necessary only for severe side effects. The preferred modality of consent was discussion with the caregiver during the clinical controls (42% of all cases). CONCLUSIONS: Patient interest in and comprehension of an informed consent form with a detailed explanation of the therapy was high; the caregiver's opinion was still the most valued teaching tool.

Diffuse vascular damage in a transplanted kidney: an indication for nuclear magnetic resonance?

Vascular lesions are an increasing challenge after renal transplantation due to the wider indications for recipients and acceptance criteria for donors. Diagnostic approach and prognostic interpretation are still matter of controversy. The case reported herein may summarize some of the issues in this regard. A 54-year-old woman, on renal replacement therapy since 1974, and a kidney graft recipient from 1975 to 1999, received a second graft in 2001. The donor age was 65 years (cold ischemia 22 hours; two mismatches). The early posttransplant follow-up was characterized by delayed graft function, hypertension, and diabetes. During the initial hypertension workup, renal graft ultrasound (US) Doppler demonstrated increased vascular resistances, stable over time (resistance index 0.74 to 0.77); renal scintiscan displayed homogeneously parenchymoa and angio-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an homogeneous parenchymal vascularization. Initial immunosuppression with tacrolimus and steroids was modulated by adding mycophenolate mofetil to taper tacrolimus (to reduce nephrotoxicity and hypertension). Despite this, kidney function slowly deteriorated; serum creatinine reached 3 to 3.5 mg/dL by the second year. After a severe hypertensive crisis with unchanged scintiscan and US doppler examinations, angio-MRI revealed the almost complete disappearance of parenchymal enhancement beyond the lobar arteries. A renal biopsy confirmed the severe vascular damage. The patient was switched to rapamycine and a low-dose of an angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. She did relatively well (serum creatinine 2.2 to 3 mg/dL) for 6 months, when rapid functional impairment forced her to restart hemodialysis. This case, almost paradigmatic of the problems occurring when the rigid vasculature of long-term dialysis patients is matched with "marginal kidneys," suggests that MRI may be a sensible good to define vascular damage in the grafted kidney.

Asclepiad's cock: a patient-physician association is a useful tool for educational programs in nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The negative impact of the mass media, the lack of information, and the request for in-depth knowledge are the basis for the present need for educational programs on transplantation, brain death, and chronic kidney diseases end-stage renal disease; (ESRD). The aim of the present article was to critically review the activities performed by Il Gallo di Esculapio, a nonprofit association, in the education on the different phases of ESRD. The associates are physicians and patients, and the activities are integrated institutionally. METHODS: This report is a narrative review of the material produced and performed by Il Gallo di Esculapio ONLUS in 1996-2004. RESULTS: The two main activities developed were book writing and an educational program. Eight books for patient education were written on different aspects of dialysis, transplantation, and ESRD. Most were designed as theses of the Medical School. Cooperation with patients was important in all cases and fundamental for the collection of interviews. EDUCATION: A 4-hour educational program on transplantation started in 2000-2001 (1 high school was involved). The checklist originally included only transplantation and organ donation, but progressively gave space also to dialysis, ESRD, and social health care problems. In 2003-2004 the program involved 67 high schools. The association coordinated progressive patient involvement. CONCLUSION: Small, nonprofit patient-physician associations linked with the University allow enrolling resources for educational activities to often-neglected parts of the medical profession.

Making a movie on kidney transplantation: a medical school graduation thesis to explain kidney transplantation from students to students.

The aim of this study was to report on the production and the opinions of a video movie on transplantation and organ donation. The video was developed by a medical school student with the help of the students and teachers of a high school for applied arts. For this task, the making of the video was included in the high school program of the participating class. The students were tutored by their photography teacher. The video movie lasts about 50 minutes. Each "scene" lasts no more than 5 minutes, to avoid reducing the attention level. The choice of a nonmedical frame helped to have some moments to digest the technical information and to stress the importance of the patient-physician relationship. The video was employed as a part of small-group lessons in the nephrology course. A semistructured anonymous questionnaire gathered the opinion of 65 students at the end of the lessons. Student satisfaction was high; the median score was the highest (8, range 6 to 10) for the lesson based upon the movie, as compared with the conventional ones on chronic kidney disease or dialysis (7, range 5 to 10). As far as the authors know, this is the first experiment of a multimedia approach, dedicated to medical and nonmedical targets, developed as a graduation thesis in an Italian Medical School. In conclusion, the positive opinions of the students, who highly appreciated the peer-developed message, may suggest implementing such nonconventional educational approaches to support human resources and enthusiasm for kidney transplantation among the new generations.

Continuing education in medicine: a useful tool for nurses' empowerment in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Continuing Education in Medicine (CEM) underlines the importance of updates and information for the health care team. Our aim was to describe the organization and results of a CEM course "educate to organ donation" that involved the nursing team in an educational experience with high school students. The course consists of theory (4 hours; the physician-patient relationship, the educational role of the nurse, the teaching policy, checklist, and results of a school education program) and practice (10 hours; the attendants join the teaching team in the classrooms and in the plenary session). Analysis of anonymous questionnaires performed after the course contained semistructured questions and analog scales. RESULTS: The first acknowledgment came from the Cabinet of Public Health, which gave the maximum number of credits (14 for 14 education hours). PARTICIPATION: presently 40 nurses, about 40% of those working in the renal unit (over 30 CEM courses are available in the hospital). Satisfaction: Overall score was median 8.5 (6 to 10) including teaching materials = 8 (4 to 10). Among the theoretical part, the lesson on patient-physician relationship obtained the highest score. The main drawback was the shortness of the practical part. The classroom meeting achieved a median score of 9.5 (7 to 10), the general session = 9 (5 to 10). All but one nurse registered for an "advanced" course, giving more time to the practical part (20 hours). CONCLUSION: CEM may represent an important way to deliver education on transplant-related issues to patients and to the general population.

EPO or not-EPO? An evidence based informed consent.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is crucial in therapeutic choices; however, the forms presented to patients are often locally developed and information may not be homogeneous. OBJECTIVE: To prepare an evidence-based model for informed consent, applied in the case of erythropoietin therapy (EPO) as a teaching tool for medical students. METHODS: Methodological tools of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) were developed within the EBM Course in the Medical School of Torino, Italy, as problem solving and patient information tools (5th year students work in small groups under the supervision of statisticians, epidemiologists and experts of internal medicine--nephrology in this case). RESULTS: Methodological and ethical problems were identified: in the pre-dialysis field, evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCT) is scant; how to use evidence gathered in dialysis? How to deal with implementation? How with the mass media? Do we need to discuss the drug choice with the patients? How to deal with rare and severe side effects?). The "evidence" was searched for on Medline/Embase, by using key-words and free terms. About 680 papers were retrieved and screened. Forms available on the Internet were retrieved and a general scheme was drawn: it included 5 areas: title, aim and targets (patients and family physicians); search strategies and updating; pros and cons of therapy; alternative options; open questions. CONCLUSIONS: EBM may offer valuable tools for systematically approaching patient information; the inclusion of this kind of exercise in the Medical School EBM courses may help enhance the awareness of future physicians of the correct communication with patients.

Opinions on renal transplantation and organ donation in high school students in two large northern (Torino) and southern (Napoli) Italian cities.

UNLABELLED: Organ shortage for transplantation has focused attention on educational interventions. Italy is a nonhomogenous country whose cultural and economic differences are reflected in the health-care system: dialysis is mainly public in the north versus private in the south; and transplantation rates display a wide range from 3.4 to 37.8 per million people in 2002. The aim of the present study was to analyze the opinions of population of high school students (last two years) in two large cities: northern (Torino) and southern (Napoli) Italy, as a knowledge base for a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of educational interventions on renal replacement therapy and organ donation, targeted to high school students. METHODS: This preliminary study included eight public high schools that completed a first and anonymous semistructured questionnaire. Five hundred and eighty nine questionnaires were retrieved in Torino and 539 in Napoli. In both cities most students answered that they would give a kidney to a brother, sister, or partner needing dialysis (Torino: yes 80.6%; no 2.2%, uncertain-blank 17.2%; Napoli: yes 86.1%, no 1.1%; uncertain-blank 12.8%). Only 36.3% of the students in Torino and 37.7% in Napoli answered that they would consent to organ donation, if they had to choose for a strict relative with brain death. Opposition was 28% in Torino and 23.7% in Napoli; 35.7% in Torino and 38.6% in Napoli were blank-uncertain. These data underline the need for detailed information on the opinions of the overall population as basis for tailored educational campaigns.

Efficacy of an educational program on dialysis, renal transplantation, and organ donation on the opinions of high school students: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Organ shortage is a rate-limiting factor for transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an educational program targeted to high school students on opinions concerning organ donation. METHODS: Sixteen public high schools in Torino, Italy, were randomized (2001 to 2002) as interventions (n = 8) or controls (n = 8). Intervention was composed of first questionnaire, first lesson (one to two classes; 2 hours, by a trained nephrology fellow); second lesson (all classes together; coordinated by a nephrologist, with patients and trainees); second questionnaire. Control included questionnaires. Statistical analysis compared the opinions in the questionnaires after stratification for age, sex, and type of school. RESULTS: Fourteen schools completed the program (seven interventions: 937 first and 808 second questionnaires; controls: 739 and 659). Television (82.5%) and newspapers (43.2%) were the main sources of information; knowledge on renal transplantation (grafts feasible per patient, average duration) was low; only 12.2% of the students gave correct answers. The opinions on living donation were highly positive (76.8%) with no difference in control, intervention schools, first and second questionnaires, according to sex, age, or type of school. The opinions on cadaveric transplantation were affected by the educational intervention with a drop in negative answers (from 33.7% to 16%), with an increase in positive (from 31.5% to 42.9%) and in uncertain ones (from 34.8% to 41.1%) among the intervention schools; 98% of the students appreciated the program. CONCLUSION: The positive effect on student opinions suggests the need to develop educational approaches as a part of our routine clinical work.

How many organs should one patient receive? The ethics of transplantation in the medical school.

BACKGROUND: Interest in the humanities in the medical school is growing; while several medical schools, mainly of Anglo-Saxon background, have developed dedicated courses, the experience in Italy is limited. METHODS: Since the academic year 2000 to 2001, a discussion of ethical problems was implemented in the nephrology course (fourth year of the Medical School of Torino, Italy; overall 6 years). In 2002 to 2003, a case entitled "Retransplantation of Multiple Organs (Prog Transplant 2002)" was discussed in 2 hours of small-group tutorial teaching: a boy received a renal graft at age 5, failed at age 7 due to recurrent glomerulonephritis, required a heart-kidney graft at age 11, and a second heart-kidney graft at 17. Student opinions were gathered by anonymous semistructured questionnaires at the beginning of the lessons as a basis for discussion. RESULTS: Following the lessons all students returned the questionnaires (n = 104). In the absence of competition for allocation, retransplantation was approved by 76.2%, unacceptable for 1% (22.9% uncertain-blank). With a waiting list of 10 patients, the opinions changed: 32.4% approved transplantation, 6.7% didn't approve it, 60.9% were uncertain. A theoretical categorization into deontological or utilitaristic approaches favored the first (41.9% vs 26.7%), with a high prevalence of blank-uncertain (31.5%); 21.9% of the students would change their opinion was that study head of the Transplant Department. CONCLUSION: Ethical aspects of the medical profession have been discussed with interest by medical school students; the high prevalence of uncertain answers and requests to develop specific tools underline the importance of this educational approach.

Kidney vending: opinions of the medical school students on this controversial issue.

BACKGROUND: In this era of globalization, in which different cultural and economic barriers are progressively abated, in the context of the development of rapid information networks such as the Internet, physicians are increasingly challenged by clinical and ethical questions. Kidney vending, banned in some countries, legal or tolerated in others, may be the prototype of the ethical aspects of health-care globalization. METHODS: To test the interest and the opinions of medical school students, a simulated case was proposed to students attending a seminar within the nephrology course fourth year of the Medical School of Torino, san Luigi): an Italian patient comes to the nephrologist's office asking for advice on the possibility to legally buy a kidney in a foreign country. The 43 students attending the lesson answered a semistructured questionnaire (15 boys, 28 girls, of median age 23 years). Attendance was within the usual standards (50 students inscribed per year). From the clinical point of view, 11.6% were favorable to kidney vending, 51.2% were contrary, 37.2% were uncertain. From the ethical point of view, no student was pro, 81.4% were contrary, and 18.6% were uncertain. The open comments underline the importance of patient self-determination and of informed consent. Similar opinions were recorded in a nonstructured question: "What should physician's attitude be, in the face of a choice he/she doesn't share?" CONCLUSION: Students' uncertainties and doubts underline the need to discuss ethical scenarios in the clinical teachings of the medical school.

To give or to receive? Opinions of teenagers on kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: The attitude toward living donation varies widely in the world, for economic and cultural reasons. In Italy, as in other Mediterranean settings, the role of living kidney donation is minor. AIM: To analyze the reasons for this attitude, we gathered data in a general population sample of high school students in a large northern Italian industrial city (Torino, about 900,000 inhabitants). METHODS: Semistructured questionnaires (n = 1676), gathered in 2001 to 2002 in 14 high schools, in the context of an educational program on dialysis, renal transplantation, and organ donation, were analyzed presumably reflecting opinions gathered before the educational intervention. RESULTS: Most students, in the case of a close relative or partner needing dialysis, answer that they would donate a kidney (yes: 78.2%, no: 2.9%, uncertain-blank: 18.9%); receiving a living donor kidney is felt as disturbing: only 57.5% of the students would accept it (no: 5.9%, uncertain-blank: 36.6%), mainly because of fear of long-term problems for the donor. Donation from an older to a younger person is seen more positively than vice versa. CONCLUSION: In our settings, the attitude of the teenagers on living donation is positive; however, while "giving" is positively seen, the presence of unresolved fears is witnessed by the lower acceptance of the idea of "taking." These data suggest to focus on the risks of kidney donation in educational campaigns and in patient-physician information. The positive attitude shared by the teenagers supports the working hypothesis that lack of information is one of the determinants of the low living donor transplantation rate in our area.

Preemptive pancreas-kidney transplantation: multidisciplinary follow-up starts too late.

BACKGROUND: Preemptive pancreas-kidney transplantation is increasingly considered at early stages of nephropathy in type 1 diabetics. A multidisciplinary approach is required, but referral to the nephrologist is often delayed. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the referral pattern of type 1 diabetics to a dedicated nephrology unit and to test the prevalence of indications for pancreas-kidney transplantation in this population, according to early preemptive criteria (creatinine >/= 2 mg/dL and/or nephrotic syndrome). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The setting of study was the first Italian Nephrology Outpatient Unit dedicated to diabetics during 1991 to 2002. The main biochemical and clinical parameters were analyzed at referral. RESULTS: Ninety type 1 diabetics underwent at least one nephrological visit during the period; 85 had data at referral. The referral pattern was stable: 1991 to June 1996 [22 men, 24 women of median age 36 (18 to 65) years; diabetological follow-up 18.0 (3 to 37) years] and July 1996 to March 2002 [26 men, 18 women median age 40 (18 to 65); diabetological follow-up 21.5 (11 to 36) years]. The main biochemical data at referral were superimposable: serum creatinine: 1.2 (0.6 to 3.2) versus 1.3 (0.6 to 7) mg/dL; proteinuria: 0.9 (0 to 11) versus 1.01 (0.05 to 12.3) g/24 hours. Diabetes follow-up was greater in July 1996 to March 2002 [18 (3 to 37) versus 21.5 (11 to 36) years] suggesting an effect of improvements in diabetic care. At referral 76.6% were macroproteinuric 85.6% had signs of end-organ damage other than nephropathy; and 30.6% had indications for pancreas-kidney grafting (creatinine >/= 2 mg/dL: n = 6 cases; nephrotic syndrome: n = 10; or both n = 10). CONCLUSIONS: One new frontier of transplantation is the need for early multidisciplinary evaluation of type 1 diabetic patients.

Complete reversal of the nephrotic syndrome after preemptive pancreas-kidney transplantation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Nephrotic syndrome due to diabetic nephropathy is presently considered an indication for pancreas-kidney transplantation even in the absence of severe renal failure. Reversal of the nephrotic syndrome has been reported, but the mechanisms of this effect are unclear. AIM: To describe the renal morphofunctional pattern and the pattern of proteinuria before and after preemptive pancreas-kidney transplantation. METHODS: Methods included quantitative and qualitative assessment of proteinuria as well as renal ultrasound and scintiscan. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes since age 24 had widespread end-organ damage. Renal biopsy (2001) showed a mainly nodular pattern of diabetic nephropathy. Following referral (1999), her serum creatinine ranged from 1.6 to 2.2 mg/dL, with nephrotic range proteinuria (glomerular nonselective, tubular complete). Renal scintiscan revealed bilateral, symmetric, well-perfused kidneys. The functional data before pancreas-kidney graft (February 2003) were: serum creatinine 1.6 mg/dL, creatinine clearance 58 mL/min, serum albumin 2.6 g/dL, proteinuria 9.1 g/d. At hospital discharge (March 2003), the creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL, the creatinine clearance 97 mL/min, the proteinuria 0.676 g/d. Two months later, the creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL and proteinuria 0.421 g/d. A renal scintiscan demonstrated the functional prevalence of the grafted kidney (77% of total function), with vital, almost completely excluded native kidneys (functional contribution, 11.5% each). Proteinuria, ranging from 0.3 to 0.6 g/d, showed a physiological pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Functional exclusion of the native kidneys by renal scintiscan gives morphological support to reversal of the nephrotic syndrome.

Pregnancy after kidney transplantation: an evidence-based approach.

Despite the relatively little space for transplantation in most medical schools, this issue is considered interesting by the students both for its clinical and ethical implications. The students were asked to choose a particular aspect of nephrology for a 2-hour case discussion. They chose the case of a 35-year-old female, kidney transplant recipient now 1.5 years postoperatively, who was coming to seek advice about pregnancy. The aim of the present work is to report an integration between narrative and evidence-based medicine (EBM) approaches. The search strategy was developed within a multidisciplinary working group, two of whose members were also masters in the methodology of systematic revisions. The first step in the discussion was the identification of ethical and methodological problem. In a rapidly developing field, books are unlikely to be able to give updated information. One needs to interact with electronic databases. In this context, no randomized controlled trial on pregnancy is expected. The evidence is likely to be heterogeneous. Prenatal care delivery differs around the world in part related to attitudes toward pregnancy, which depend upon religion and traditions. The second step was the definition of the search strategy. The third step, was selecting and cataloging the evidence. The titles and abstracts retrieved by the search strategy (272 items) were examined to identify full papers to be retrieved. The evidence retrieved was screened for the type of paper (reviews, primary studies, case reports, case series) and for the authors to give an indirect idea of duplicate publication bias. Teaching a complex and ever-changing subject, such as kidney transplantation, is a difficult task. The case of a young woman seeking information on the probability to undergo a successful pregnancy was particularly likely to exemplify the importance of being aware of the biases of the book-based information and on the need to interact with the internet. The search strategy developed by the working group of postgraduate trainees allowed students to have a direct experience with the complexity of the field. This preliminary study, as the basis for development of a checklist informed consent form on pregnancy in kidney transplantation, may give a first rough quantification of the work needed by a physician who wants to have a direct idea of the odds and risks of pregnancy in kidney transplant patients.

What do Italian medical students read? A call for a library of good books on physicians for physicians.

Humanities are increasingly taught in medical schools based on the premise that sensitive and educated human beings may become better physicians. There have been few reports of what is offered in Italian medical schools and we have not been able to identify any published survey of student opinions.

Teaching technology with technology: computer assisted lessons in the medical school the first Italian experience in nephrology and dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis is often neglected in academic teaching. At the University of Torino, Italy, teaching Nephrology (4th year of Medical School) consists of 21 hours of formal lessons, 10 hours/student of interactive lessons (4/10 dedicated to dialysis) and 10 optional lessons (3 regarding dialysis). Interactive and optional lessons widely employ computer assisted teaching. Aim of the study was to evaluate student satisfaction on this approach. METHODS: Student satisfaction was assessed on 4 sample lessons (166 students), by two short dedicated questionnaires (0-10 scale, open questions). RESULTS: High scores were given to the dialysis lessons (median 8/10). Computer assisted interface (median 8/10, range 6-10) was of help in check of knowledge in real time (86%), enhancing participation (61%); 62% suggest extending this experience to selected courses, 38% to all. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students consider dialysis an important part of the academic teaching of Nephrology; new interfaces may help to enhance student satisfaction.