Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication 2 years after operation. A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic operation has replaced the conventional open procedure in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in spite of the fact that long-term results based on controlled clinical trials have been lacking. The objective of this study was to compare outcome, quality of life, and patient satisfaction after laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication in a community hospital setting with a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Forty-two patients with GERD were randomized to either laparoscopic (LNF) or open (ONF) Nissen fundoplication. Outcome evaluation included reflux symptoms, gastrointestinal quality of life (GIQLI), and upper GI endoscopy. RESULTS: Esophagitis was cured among all patients in the LNF group and in 90% of the ONF group. There were two patients (10%) in both groups who had medicine-dependent recurrent reflux together with significant worsening in the GIQLI scores. One patient in the LNF group has been reoperated due to a suture granuloma in the left epigastric port. Two patients in the LNF group needed esophageal dilatation due to persistent dysphagia. GIQLI scores (scale, 0-144) were equally normalized in both groups. Overall, 90% in the LNF and 100% in the ONF group were either satisfied or very satisfied with the operation. There was only one patient (LNF) who would not choose to have the operation again. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication seem to be equally effective methods for improving reflux symptoms and quality of life, resulting in a high rate of satisfaction among patients with an intermediate follow-up period of 2 years.

Short-term symptomatic outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic versus open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic operation has replaced conventional operation in the treatment of reflux disease. This change has been mostly based on excellent results from highly experienced antireflux surgeons rather than on randomized clinical trials. AIMS: The objective of this study was to compare the short-term symptomatic outcome and patient quality of life costs after laparoscopic (LNF) or open Nissen fundoplication (ONF) in a community hospital setting with less experienced surgeons. METHODS: Forty-two patients with documented gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were randomized to either LNF or ONF. Symptomatic outcome using a custom questionnaire and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) were measured pre- and postoperatively at one and three months. RESULTS: Esophagitis was cured among all patients in LNF group compared to 90% in the ONF group. The symptoms observed preoperatively were significantly improved in both groups, except for dysphagia and flatulence. Dysphagia was more common after LNF. The GIQLI (scale 0-144) was equally normalized in both groups. The mean GIQLI-change among all patients was 37.9 points. Patient satisfaction did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: LNF and ONF are effective methods in the operative treatment of GERD in short-term and result in a significant improvement in patients gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life.

Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month followup.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has replaced conventional operation despite the fact that currently no randomized trials have been published regarding its cost effectiveness. The objective of the present study was to compare costs and some short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-two patients with documented gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomized between October 1995 and October 1996 to either laparoscopic (LNF) or open (ONF) Nissen fundoplication. Some short-term outcomes, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) hospital costs, and costs to society were assessed. Followup was 3 months. RESULTS: Medians of operation times in the LNF and ONF groups were 98 min and 74 min, respectively. Hospital stay was 2.5 days shorter after laparoscopic operation (LNF 3 days versus ONF 5.5 days). Both operations were equally safe and effective, but the LNF group experienced significantly less pain and fatigue during the first 3 postoperative weeks. Improvement in the GIQLI and overall patient satisfaction were comparable between the methods. Convalescence was faster in the LNF group: return to normal life being 14 versus 31 days and return to work being 21 versus 44 days in the LNF and ONF groups, respectively. Hospital costs were similar, $2,981 and $3,140 in the LNF and ONF groups, respectively, but total costs were lower ($7,506 versus $13,118) in the LNF group as a result of an earlier return to work. CONCLUSIONS: LNF is superior in cost effectiveness, assuming that the longterm results between the methods are comparable.

Total rupture of pectoralis major muscle in athletes.

Total rupture of the pectoralis major muscle is rare. It may follow a severe trauma or strenuous athletic exercise or performance. Five cases of total rupture of the pectoralis major muscle treated in athletes are reported. Two of them had made an extremely exerted effort in weight lifting, one was injured during a parachute landing, one was tackled in an ice hockey match, and one injured his pectoralis major muscle while pushing himself up from a swimming pool. In two cases the diagnosis was made early and in three cases 2-4 months after the injury. All of the patients were male and were treated successfully with surgery. Later they were able to exercise their sports. The weight lifters did not go on with competitive sports.