Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 59(3): 106536, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35091054

RESUMO

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A) in the treatment of infections due to Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in critically ill patients. A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted in critically ill patients receiving C/A for GNB infections. We evaluated demographic data, localisation and severity of infection, clinical and microbiological outcomes, and mortality. A total of 68 patients received C/A for serious GNB infections. The main infections were respiratory (33.8%), intra-abdominal (22.1%) and urinary tract infections (10.3%); bacteraemia was found in 22 cases (32.4%). Most infections were complicated by septic shock (58.8%) or sepsis (36.8%) and most of them required life-supporting therapies. Enterobacterales (79.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.1%) were the most frequently isolated bacteria; 84.2% of isolates were carbapenem-resistant. Thirty-four patients (50.0%) received C/A in combination with other antimicrobials. Fifty patients (73.5%) presented a favourable clinical response. Microbiological eradication was documented in 25 cases (36.8%). No significant differences were found in clinical response between patients treated with monotherapy or combined therapy (79.4% vs. 67.6%; P = 0.27). Overall intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was 41.2%. Univariate analysis showed that 30-day all-cause mortality was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with bacteraemia, previous corticosteroid use and the need of life-supporting therapies. C/A appears to be an effective therapy for severe infections due to GNB, including carbapenem-resistant isolates, in critically ill patients. C/A combination therapy was not associated with a higher clinical response. Mortality correlated significantly with the presence of bacteraemia, previous corticosteroid use and the need for life-supporting therapies.


Assuntos
Ceftazidima , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Estado Terminal , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Rev. chil. anest ; 51(2): 213-216, 2022. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1567548

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One of the newest antibiotics against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is Cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin able to overcome most resistance mechanisms, including metallo-beta-lactamases. Several studies are being carried to prove its clinical benefit. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old male patient was admitted in the ICU undergoing septic shock due to surgical wound infection. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonasputida grew in blood cultures and Pseudomonas aeruginosa grew in soft tissue cultures. He was treated with colistin and tobramycin, developing nephro and ototoxicity. Compassionate use of cefiderocol was ordered, and the infection was cured within 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evidence of cefiderocol treatment in a soft tissue infection within a surgical wound infection. Our experience with cefiderocol in surgical wound infection suggests that it may be helpful in treating infections at that level, but more clinical trials are still needed.


ANTECEDENTES: Uno de los antibióticos más nuevos contra las bacterias multirresistentes (MDR) es el cefiderocol, una cefalos- porina siderófora capaz de superar la mayoría de los mecanismos de resistencia, incluidas las metalobetalactamasas. Se están realizando varios estudios para demostrar su beneficio clínico. PRESENTACIÓN DEL CASO: Paciente masculino de 55 años que ingresó en la UCI con shock séptico por infección de herida quirúrgica. Pseudomonas putida multirresistente creció en hemocultivos y Pseudomonas aeruginosa crecieron en cultivos de tejidos blandos. Fue tratado con colistina y tobramicina, desarrollando nefro y ototoxicidad. Se indicó cefiderocol y la infección se curó en 14 días. CONCLUSIONES: Esta es la primera evidencia de cefiderocol en el tratamiento de una infección de partes blandas dentro de una infección de herida quirúrgica. Nuestra experiencia con cefiderocol en infección de herida quirúrgica sugiere que puede ser útil en el tratamiento de infecciones a ese nivel, pero aún se necesitan más ensayos clínicos.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Cefiderocol/uso terapêutico , Antibióticos beta Lactam/uso terapêutico , Choque Séptico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Pseudomonas putida , Estado Terminal , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos
6.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 57(3): 106270, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33347991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) for treating infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) in critically ill patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective and observational study was conducted in critically ill patients receiving different C/T dosages and antibiotic combinations for P. aeruginosa infections. Demographic data, localisation and severity of infection, clinical and microbiological outcome, and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients received C/T for P. aeruginosa serious infections. The main infections were nosocomial pneumonia (56.2%), intra-abdominal infection (10.5%), tracheobronchitis (8.4%), and urinary tract infection (6.3%). Most infections were complicated with sepsis (49.5%) or septic shock (45.3%), and bacteraemia (10.5%). Forty-six episodes were treated with high-dose C/T (3 g every 8 hours) and 38 episodes were treated with standard dosage (1.5 g every 8 hours). Almost half (44.2%) of the patients were treated with C/T monotherapy, and the remaining group received combination therapy with other antibiotics. Sixty-eight (71.6%) patients presented a favourable clinical response. Microbiological eradication was documented in 42.1% (40/95) of the episodes. The global ICU mortality was 36.5%. Univariate analysis showed that 30-day mortality was significantly associated (P < 0.05) with Charlson Index at ICU admission and the need of life-supporting therapies. CONCLUSIONS: C/T appeared to be an effective therapy for severe infections due to P. aeruginosa in critically ill patients. Mortality was mainly related to the severity of the infection. No benefit was observed with high-dose C/T or combination therapy with other antibiotics.


Assuntos
Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/mortalidade , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Tazobactam/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estado Terminal , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA