Analysis of the vergence facility test using different prismatic dioptric powers.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The vergence facility (VF) test is important in a complete optometric examination, but there is still controversy over which prismatic power combinations to use according to the patient age, especially in children. BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to study the VF test using three different prismatic power combinations in four age groups, with a view to determine the best prismatic power for performing the test. METHODS: The VF of 122 healthy subjects was evaluated using three prismatic flippers with different powers: 8∆ base-in with 8∆ base-out (8BI/8BO∆), 3BI/12BO∆ and 5BI/15BO∆. The number of cycles per minute (cpm) was counted. RESULTS: The participants were divided into four age groups. The mean age of group 1 was 6.69 ± 0.65 years, that of group 2 was 9.36 ± 0.87 years, that of group 3 was 12.08 ± 0.79 years and that of group 4 was 28.67 ± 8.11 years. The mean cpm value in VF was higher for near vision than in distance vision. The lowest cpm values were observed in the youngest group (group 1) (far vision: 8BI/8BO∆: 2.32 cpm, 3BI/12BO∆: 2.68 cpm and 5BI/15BO∆: 1.59 cpm; near vision: 8/8∆: 6.59 cpm, 3BI/12BO∆: 7.77 cpm and 5BI/15BO∆: 5.27 cpm). The cpm values increased progressively with age, with group 4 achieving the highest cpm values (far vision: 8BI/8BO∆: 3.61 cpm, 3BI/12BO∆: 8.56 cpm and 5BI/15BO∆: 5.28 cpm; near vision: 8BI/8BO∆: 10.22 cpm, 3BI/12BO∆: 12.28 cpm and 5BI/15BO∆: 10.89 cpm). CONCLUSIONS: VF increased with age. The youngest children achieved the lowest cpm values, which progressively increased until the highest cpm values were achieved in adults. The best results were found with 3BI/12BO∆ in all groups in near and far vision. Higher cpm values were achieved in near vision than in far vision with all flippers in all groups.

Influence of ocular biometric factors on the defocus curve in an enlarged depth-of-focus intraocular lens.

BACKGROUND: To assess the influence of biometric measurements on the defocus curve after the implantation of enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Patients who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of Tecnis Symfony IOL were enrolled. Preoperatively, axial length (AL), corneal keratometry (K), pupil size and corneal aberrations were measured. 1 month after surgery, distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities (VA) were recorded. At 3 months, monocular and binocular corrected contrast sensitivities under photopic and mesopic lighting conditions were measured with CSV-1000E test. At 6-months, the defocus curve between -5.00 to + 3.00 diopters (D) was assessed in steps of 0.50 D, and NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire was administered. RESULTS: One hundred thirty one eyes of 66 patients were included. Binocular logMAR VA better than 0.1 for intermediate vision was obtained in 90% of patients, whereas only 17.7% obtained that result in near vision. The rate of satisfaction was high (96%) and most of them (85.5%) had no or little difficulties in near vision. The mean amplitude of the defocus curve was 2.35D ± 0.73D, and smaller AL, smaller pupils, younger age, and male sex were associated with wider range of clear vision. CONCLUSIONS: Tecnis Symfony IOL enables functional vision at all distances, but demographic variables and preoperative biometric measurements like AL and pupil size influence the postoperative amplitude of the defocus curve. These parameters could be used to predict the performance of EDoF IOLs.