Radial Type Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Enhances Penile Microvascular Perfusion in an Aging Rat Model: A Novel Interventional Strategy to Treat Erectile Dysfunction.

PURPOSE: Physiological aging is associated with microvascular dysfunction, including in the penis, and this may contribute to age-related erectile dysfunction (ED). Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) is a non-invasive intervention for ED, but its effect on penile microvascular function, remains unclear. Our objectives are to (i) evaluate the effect of Li-ESWT (specifically radial type ESWT [rESWT]) on penile microvascular perfusion (PMP) in aging rats, (ii) elucidate a possible mechanism, and (iii) evaluate its impact on angiogenic and smooth muscle biomarkers in cavernosal tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male rats (n=9; 15-18 months) were anesthetized and subjected to rESWT while monitoring PMP. The nitric oxide (NO) pathway involvement was assessed by measuring the effect of rESWT on PMP following an intracavernosal injection of N(G)-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (NO synthase inhibitor). To elucidate the cellular mechanism, another group of rats received repeated rESWT (n=4) or no treatment (n=4) three times/week for two weeks. Rats were euthanized at the end of the study and penile tissues were analyzed for angiogenic markers (vascular endothelial growth factor-A [VEGF-A], endothelial nitric oxide synthase [eNOS]) and smooth muscle content (α-actin) using immunostaining, Western blot, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: rESWT resulted in more than a 2-fold increase in PMP (from 68.5 arbitrary units; 163.7 AU). L-NAME injection produced a <40%-50% decrease (185.3 to 101.0 AU) in rESWT-induced PMP response. Immunostaining revealed increased α-actin, eNOS, and VEGF-A in the cavernosum and these findings were confirmed by qPCR and Western blot results. CONCLUSIONS: rESWT improved PMP, which may be mediated via increased VEGF expression, which stimulates the NO/cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway, resulting in sustained PMP. rESWT devices could offer a safe, non-invasive treatment for age-related ED.

A Comparative Analysis between Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of >15 mm Non-Obstructing Proximal Ureteral Stones.

BACKGROUND: The proper surgical modality for large non-obstructing proximal ureteral stones is disputed. We compare effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TPNL) in treatment of upper ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who performed FURL or TPNL for upper ureteral stones between June 2016 and November 2018. Comparative analysis was conducted regarding demographic parameters, stone free rate, postoperative pain and complications. RESULTS: This study included 58 patients treated with FURL and 60 patients treated with TPNL owing to upper ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm. Stone size was similar in the FURL and TPNL groups (17.6 ± 2.6 vs. 18.0 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.194). The overall 3-month stone clearance rate was 95.8% for FURL versus 96.0% for TPNL (p = 0.575). There was no difference between the FURL and TPNL groups for hospital stay (p = 0.280) and postoperative complications. On the other hand, patients treated with FURL had longer operative time (p = 0.012) and less postoperative pain (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques were considered feasible and effective surgical procedures in the treatment of large upper ureteral stones.

Are hemostatic agents for selective cases of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy necessary for access tract control? A randomized control trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) access tract sealing agent. Fibrin glue and Tachosil® were used for sealing the access tract and compared to the control. Post operative computed tomography (CT) scan was used to evaluate those efficacies. METHODS: A total of 108 patients were randomized to three groups: In group 1, the access tract was sutured, and compressive dressing was done. In group 2, the fibrin glue was injected into the access tract with a tip applicator at the end of operation. And group 3, Tachosil® was rolled on its longitudinal axis and plugged into the access tract. Non-contrast CT at POD 1 was taken and perirenal hematoma thickness was measured and graded. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, VAS score, stone-free status, and hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperative demographic differences were not significant in all three arms. Postoperative CT scans in all groups demonstrated mostly minimal grade access tract hematomas. Mean perirenal hematoma thickness showed no significant differences (2.66 ± 3.74, 2.73 ± 3.85, 2.54 ± 4.37 mm, p = 0.981), respectively. Postoperative hemoglobin drop (0.75 ± 0.58, 0.84 ± 0.47, 0.91 ± 0.60 g/dl, p = 0.74), stone-free rate (93.75, 87.87, 87.87%, p = 0.121), VAS (p = 0.499) and hospital stay (1.81 ± 0.84, 1.48 ± 0.71, 1.59 ± 0.75 day, p = 0.127) were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Fibrin glue and Tachosil® in tubeless PCNL were not necessary for postoperative access tract control.