Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 2024 Jan 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258802

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at the time of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis has been proposed as a predictor of long-term survival. The aim of the study was to analyse its usefulness in a homogeneous population with control of the main confounding factors. METHODOLOGY: Observational study of 836 patients operated on for CRC who were divided into two groups: NLR ≤ 3.3 vs NLR > 3.3. To control for confounders, they were matched one-to-one by propensity analysis. A final sample of 526 patients remained for study. RESULTS: The two groups were mismatched in terms of age, comorbidity, tumour stage, rectal location, and neoadjuvant therapy. Once matching was performed, baseline NLR was statistically significantly associated with long-term survival (p < 0.001) and behaved as an independent prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.001; HR: 1,996; 95% CI: 1.32-3.00) when adjusted in a Cox regression model using age (p < 0,001; HR: 1,04; IC95%: 1,02-1,06) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0,001; HR: 1,40; IC95%: 1,27-1,55). Neoadjuvant therapy lost its statistical significance (p = 0,137; HR: 1,59; IC95%: 0,86-2,93). CONCLUSIONS: A high baseline NLR (> 3.3) in patients with colorectal cancer at diagnosis represents a poor prognostic factor in terms of survival. Its use in routine practice could intensify therapeutic strategies and follow-up in these patients.

2.
Surg Oncol ; 42: 101780, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35594722

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery have been associated with poor long-term prognosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic impact of postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery assessed by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) and designing a new prognostic score based on this index. METHODS: This observational longitudinal study included a series of 604 patients who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer. Demographic data, comorbidity measured by Charlson Index, tumor characteristics, surgical data and postoperative complications were recorded as predictors. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed and long-term survival was the output variable. Based on Hazard Ratios obtained on multivariate analysis, a new score, S-CRC-PC, was created for predicting long-term survival. RESULTS: Two-hundred and twelve (35.1%) patients developed some postoperative complication. The mean CCI was 11.6 (±19.19). Mild complications (CCI <26.2) were detected in 95 (15.7%) patients. Moderate complications (CCI 26.2-42.2) were detected in 64 (10.6%) patients. Severe complications (CCI >42.3) were detected in 53 patients (8.8%) patients. Mortality rate was 1.7%. In multivariate analysis, age (p < 0.001), Charlson score (p = 0.014), CCI (p < 0.001), and TNM stage (p < 0.001) were statistically significantly in relation to long-term survival rate. S-CRC-PC score was statistically associated with survival rate (HR: 1.34-95% CI: 1.27-1.41). Patients with S-CRC-PC values from 0 to 8 points (low risk), 8.1-16 points (medium risk), and scores above 16 points (high risk) had a cumulative survival rate at five-years of 98%, 83%, and 31% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery assessed by CCI are an independent prognostic factor of survival rate. The S-CRC-PC score may be helpful in predicting long-term cancer outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Rev. senol. patol. mamar. (Ed. impr.) ; 29(4): 163-169, oct.-dic. 2016. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-158727

RESUMO

Objetivo. La intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT, «radioterapia intraoperatoria») en pacientes seleccionadas con cáncer de mama permite un tratamiento corto y preciso durante la cirugía conservadora sobre el lecho tumoral in situ. Presentamos nuestra experiencia inicial de IORT con dispositivo Intrabeam®. Pacientes y métodos. Se seleccionaron inicialmente 120 pacientes con cáncer de mama para IORT con Intrabeam® según protocolo TARGIT-A, desde enero de 2013 hasta febrero de 2015. Las indicaciones fueron: candidatas a cirugía conservadora, mayores de 45 años, diagnóstico histológico de carcinoma ductal infiltrante≤3cm hormonodependiente y axila clínica, ecográfica e histológicamente negativa. Resultados. De las pacientes seleccionadas, 34 (28%) no recibieron IORT debido al tamaño de la cavidad quirúrgica (28 casos) o problemas técnicos (6 casos). Finalmente, 86 pacientes (72%) recibieron IORT. La edad media fue de 64 años (DE±8,4). En 22 pacientes (26%) fue preciso administrar radioterapia externa a toda la mama. Trece pacientes (15%) tuvieron complicaciones: 3 casos de seroma que precisaron de más de 3 punciones para resolución (4%), 6 casos de absceso-mastitis (7%), 2 casos de hematoma (2%) y 2 casos de dehiscencia parcial de la herida quirúrgica (2%). No hubo toxicidad grave (grado iii-iv). El resultado estético fue bueno o muy bueno en el 87% de las pacientes (75). Conclusión. La IORT con Intrabeam® es una alternativa segura y bien tolerada frente a la radioterapia externa en pacientes seleccionadas, con un buen resultado estético a corto plazo (AU)


Objective. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in selected patients with breast cancer allows a short and precise treatment on the tumor bed in situ during conservative surgery. We present our initial experience of IORT with the Intrabeam® device. Patients and methods. From January 2013 to February 2015, 120 patients with breast cancer were pre-selected for IORT with Intrabeam® according to the TARGIT-A protocol. The indications were as follows: candidates for conservative surgery, age older than 45 years, a histological diagnosis of hormone-dependent infiltrating ductal carcinoma≤3cm and absence of axillary involvement on physical, ultrasound and histological examination. Results. Among the selected patients, 34 (28%) did not receive IORT due to the size of the surgical cavity (28 patients) or technical problems (6 patients). Finally, 86 patients (72%) received IORT. The average age was 64 years (SD±8.4). In 22 patients (26%), it was necessary to administer external beam radiotherapy to the whole breast. Thirteen patients (15%) had complications: 3 cases of seroma requiring more than 3 attempts for resolution (4%), 6 cases of abscess-mastitis (7%), 2 cases of hematoma (2%) and 2 cases of partial dehiscence of the surgical wound (2%). There was no severe toxicity (grade iii-iv). The aesthetic result was good or very good in 87% of the patients (n=75). Conclusion. IORT with Intrabeam® is a safe and well tolerated alternative versus external radiotherapy in selected patients and provides a good short-term aesthetic result (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Radioterapia/instrumentação , Radioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/radioterapia , Monitorização Intraoperatória/instrumentação , Protocolos Antineoplásicos/classificação , Protocolos Antineoplásicos/normas , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/instrumentação , Análise de Dados/métodos
6.
Cir Esp ; 85(3): 158-64, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19309604

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prosthesis infection is an infrequent but important complication in abdominal wall surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the infection of the prosthesis after hernia repair, as well as the treatment to apply. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between January 2002 and December 2006, we performed 1055 prosthetic hernia repairs: 761 inguinal hernias (72.1%), 74 umbilical hernias (7%) and 220 ventral hernias (20.9%). We prospectively analysed preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables, as well as the incidence of infection of surgical wound and of prosthesis. We used ASA classification for preoperative anaesthetic evaluation. RESULTS: The overall percentage of infection of the prosthesis was 1.3%. Infection was observed in 11 repairs with polypropylene mesh (PPL), in 4 with PTFE mesh, and one case in combined mesh. Risk factors of mesh infection were: obesity (p=0.002), diabetes (p=0.020), the type of repair (p=0.047), emergency surgery (p=0.001), the type and size of mesh (p=0.003; p=0.007) and time of surgery >180 min (p<0.001). Seven of the 11 patients with infection of PPL prosthesis were resolved with conservative treatment, whereas all the cases with PTFE infection or mixed mesh needed removal to solve the problem. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors are involved in producing a prosthesis infection. Whereas antibiotic treatment and surgical drainage of the infection can be sufficient in most PPL mesh infection, PTFE prostheses need to be removed prematurely in order to halt the infection process.


Assuntos
Hérnia Abdominal/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
7.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 85(3): 158-164, mar. 2009. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-59913

RESUMO

Introducción: la infección de la prótesis es una complicación infrecuente pero importante en la cirugía de la pared abdominal. El objetivo de este estudio es valorar la incidencia y los factores de riesgo influyentes en la infección de la prótesis tras la reparación herniaria, así como el tratamiento a aplicar. Material y método: entre enero de 2002 y diciembre de 2006, se realizaron en total 1.055 reparaciones protésicas herniarias: 761 hernias inguinocrurales (72,1%), 74 hernias umbilicales (7%) y 220 eventroplastias (20,9%). Se analizaron de forma prospectiva variables preoperatorias, intraoperatorias y postoperatorias, así como la incidencia de infección de herida quirúrgica y de prótesis. Se utilizó la clasificación ASA para la valoración preoperatoria anestésica. Resultados: el porcentaje de infección del biomaterial en general fue del 1,3%. Observamos infección en 11 reparaciones con prótesis de polipropileno (PPL), en 4 con PTFE-e y 1 caso en prótesis combinada. Fueron factores de riesgo en la infección del biomaterial: la obesidad (p=0,002), la diabetes mellitus (p=0,020), el tipo de reparación (p=0,047), la intervención de urgencia (p=0,001), el tipo y el tamaño de la prótesis (p=0,003 y p=0,007) y el tiempo quirúrgico >180min (p<0,001). De 11 pacientes con infección de prótesis de PPL, 7 respondieron al tratamiento con curas, mientras que todos los casos con infección de PTFE-e o prótesis mixta necesitaron de su extirpación para resolver el problema. Conclusiones: existen numerosos factores de riesgo influyentes en la tasa de infección del biomaterial. Mientras que la terapia antibiótica adecuada y el drenaje quirúrgico de la infección pueden ser suficientes en la mayoría de las infecciones de prótesis de PPL, las de PTFE-e requieren extirpación precoz para acabar con el proceso infectivo (AU)


Introduction: Prosthesis infection is an infrequent but important complication in abdominal wall surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the infection of the prosthesis after hernia repair, as well as the treatment to apply. Material and method: Between January 2002 and December 2006, we performed 1055 prosthetic hernia repairs: 761 inguinal hernias (72.1%), 74 umbilical hernias (7%) and 220 ventral hernias (20.9%). We prospectively analysed preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables, as well as the incidence of infection of surgical wound and of prosthesis. We used ASA classification for preoperative anaesthetic evaluation. Results: The overall percentage of infection of the prosthesis was 1.3%. Infection was observed in 11 repairs with polypropylene mesh (PPL), in 4 with PTFE mesh, and one case in combined mesh. Risk factors of mesh infection were: obesity (p=0.002), diabetes (p=0.020), the type of repair (p=0.047), emergency surgery (p=0.001), the type and size of mesh (p=0.003; p=0.007) and time of surgery >180min (p<0.001). Seven of the 11 patients with infection of PPL prosthesis were resolved with conservative treatment, whereas all the cases with PTFE infection or mixed mesh needed removal to solve the problem. Conclusions: Several factors are involved in producing a prosthesis infection. Whereas antibiotic treatment and surgical drainage of the infection can be sufficient in most PPL mesh infection, PTFE prostheses need to be removed prematurely in order to halt the infection process (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Hérnia Abdominal/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Incidência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...