Humanistic burden of haemophilia A without inhibitors: A cross-sectional analysis of the HemoLIFE study.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of haemophilia A without inhibitors on humanistic outcomes in patients and caregivers. Herein, we report a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data of persons with haemophilia (PWH) participating in the prospective study HEMOLIFE. METHODS: These data are part of a prospective, observational, and multicentre study currently being conducted in 20 hospitals in Spain by haematologists. We included subjects 12 years or older diagnosed with haemophilia. The evaluations included the Maladjustment Scale, Haemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (HaemoQol)/HaemoQol Short Form (Children), haemophilia-specific version of the Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire plus the Classroom Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI+CIQ:HS), Haemophilia Activity List (HAL)/Paediatric Haemophilia Activities List (pedHAL), visual analogue scale (VAS) for evaluating pain, Coping Pain Questionnaire-Reduced (CAD-R), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: A total of 81 PWH were recruited at 18 centres; 66 PWH were ≥18 years (i.e., adults), and PWH 15 were <18 years (i.e., paediatric patients). Out of the 79 evaluable subjects, 16 (20%) showed an impact of haemophilia on daily life, and the areas most affected were "leisure time" (58% showed maladjustment) and "work/studies" (47% showed maladjustment). Patients reported a higher impact of haemophilia on quality of life (mean [SD] of the transformed score) in the dimensions of "sport" (49.4 [28.6]), "physical health" (40.5 [25.8]) and "future" (37.7 [28.9]). In adults, according to HAL scores, greater impairment of function was observed in "lying/sitting/kneeling/standing," "function of legs" and "leisure activities and sports," with mean normalized scores of 64.7, 65.1 and 69.0, respectively. Productivity was mostly impacted by presenteeism. The pain was infrequent and moderate. According to the HADS scores, nine (11.5%) patients had clinical anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: PWH without inhibitors exhibited impairments in adjustment, quality of life and functionality, especially related to leisure and sports activities, and exhibit relevant levels of anxiety and depression.

Fostamatinib effectiveness and safety for immune thrombocytopenia in clinical practice.

Fostamatinib, a recently approved syk inhibitor used in adult primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), has been shown to be safe and effective in this disorder. However, clinical trial results may not be similarly reproduced in clinical practice. Here 138 ITP patients (both primary and secondary) from 42 Spanish centers who had been treated with fostamatinib were evaluated prospectively and retrospectively. The median age of our cohort (55.8% women) was 66 years (interquartile range, IQR, 56-80 years). The median time since ITP diagnosis at fostamatinib initiation was 51 months (IQR, 10-166 months). The median number of therapies prior to fostamatinib initiation was 4 (IQR, 2-5), including eltrombopag (76.1%), romiplostim (57.2%) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) (44.2%). Fifty-eight patients (42.0%) had signs/symptoms of bleeding in the month prior to treatment initiation. 79.0% of patients responded to fostamatinib with 53.6% complete responses (platelet count > 100 x 109 /L). Eighty-three patients (60.1%) received fostamatinib monotherapy achieving a high response rate (85.4%). The proportion of time in response during the 27-month period examined was 83.3%. The median time to platelet response was 11 days (IQR, 7-21 days). Sixty-seven patients (48.5%) experienced adverse events, mainly grade 1-2, the commonest of which were diarrhea (n = 28) and hypertension (n = 21). One patient had deep venous thrombosis and one patient developed acute myocardial infarction. Fostamatinib was shown to be effective with good safety profile in patients with primary and secondary ITP across a wide age spectrum in this real-world study.

Recommendations for the Clinical Approach to Immune Thrombocytopenia: Spanish ITP Working Group (GEPTI).

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a complex autoimmune disease whose hallmark is a deregulation of cellular and humoral immunity leading to increased destruction and reduced production of platelets. The heterogeneity of presentation and clinical course hampers personalized approaches for diagnosis and management. In 2021, the Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI) of the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH) updated a consensus document that had been launched in 2011. The updated guidelines have been the reference for the diagnosis and management of primary ITP in Spain ever since. Nevertheless, the emergence of new tools and strategies makes it advisable to review them again. For this reason, we have updated the main recommendations appropriately. Our aim is to provide a practical tool to facilitate the integral management of all aspects of primary ITP management.

Consenso de recomendaciones para la mejora de la coordinación asistencial inter e intra-centros en el abordaje de la hemofilia / Consensus recommendations for the improvement of inter- and intra-centre care coordination in the management of hemophilia

Objetivo: definir las recomendaciones consensuadas para mejorar la coordinación asistencial entre Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hematología y Enfermería, inter e intra-centros, en la atención a los pacientes con hemofilia. Método: se identificaron y valoraron las recomendaciones para la mejora de la coordinación asistencial en el abordaje de los pacientes con hemofilia, por parte de un panel multidisciplinar de profesionales con experiencia en este campo (Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hematología y Enfermería) y apoyado en la evidencia científica. La valoración de las recomendaciones identificadas se realizó por metodología de consenso Rand/UCLA (Delphi-adaptado) con base en su adecuación y, posteriormente, a su necesidad. En ambos casos, se empleó la escala ordinal de Likert. Los datos se analizaron estadísticamente a través de diferentes métricas. Resultados: se identificaron 53 recomendaciones para la mejora de la coordinación asistencial entre Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hematología y Enfermería en el manejo del paciente con hemofilia, agrupadas en 8 ámbitos de actuación: i) Unidades de Hemofilia, centros de referencia y abordaje multidisciplinar; ii) papel de Hematología, Farmacia Hospitalaria y Enfermería en el recorrido asistencial de los pacientes con hemofilia; iii) telefarmacia y telemedicina; iv) monitorización farmacocinética; v) transición al régimen de paciente adulto; vi) educación sanitaria al paciente; vii) cirugía, urgencias e ingreso hospitalario; y viii) evaluación de los resultados. Todas las recomendaciones fueron valoradas por el panel de expertos externos como adecuadas y necesarias. Conclusiones: el recorrido asistencial del paciente con hemofilia es complejo y depende de diversas variables. Además, requiere la implicación de distintos profesionales sanitarios que deben actuar de manera coordinada e integrada en todas las etapas de la vida del paciente, de manera adaptada a sus necesidades individuales. ... (AU)

Objective: Define consensus recommendations to improve care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing, inter- and intra-center, in the care of haemophilia patients.Method: Recommendations for the improvement of care coordination in the management of haemophilia patients were identified and assessed by a multidisciplinary panel of professionals with experience in this field (Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing) and supported by scientific evidence. The identified recommendations were assessed by Rand/UCLA consensus methodology (Delphi-adapted) based on their appropriateness and, subsequently, on their necessity. In both cases, it was used ordinal Likert scale. Data were statistically analysed through different metrics. Results: Fifty-three recommendations for the improvement of care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing in the management of haemophilia patients were identified, grouped into eight areas of action: i) Haemophilia units, reference centers and multidisciplinary care; ii) Role of Haematology, Hospital Pharmacy and Nursing in the patient journey of haemophilia patients; iii) Telepharmacy and telemedicine; iv) Pharmacokinetic monitoring; v) Transition to adult patient regimen; vi) Patient health education; vii) Surgery, emergency room and hospital admission; and viii) Outcome evaluation. All recommendations were assessed as appropriate and necessary by the external expert panel. Conclusions: Haemophilia patient journey is complex and depends on different variables. It also requires the involvement of different healthcare professionals who must act in a coordinated and integrated manner at all stages of the patient's life, adapted to their individual needs. ... (AU)

[Translated article] Consensus recommendations for the improvement of inter- and intra-centre care coordination in the management of hemophilia.

OBJECTIVE: Define consensus recommendations to improve care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Hematology and Nursing, inter- and intra-center, in the care of hemophilia patients. METHOD: Recommendations for the improvement of care coordination in the management of hemophilia patients were identified and assessed by a multidisciplinary panel of professionals with experience in this field (Hospital Pharmacy, Hematology and Nursing) and supported by scientific evidence. The identified recommendations were assessed by Rand/UCLA consensus methodology (Delphi-adapted) based on their appropriateness and, subsequently, on their necessity. In both cases, it was used ordinal Likert scale. Data were statistically analyzed through different metrics. RESULTS: Fifty-three recommendations for the improvement of care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Hematology and Nursing in the management of hemophilia patients were identified, grouped into eight areas of action: i) Hemophilia units, reference centers and multidisciplinary care; ii) Role of Hematology, Hospital Pharmacy and Nursing in the patient journey of hemophilia patients; iii) Telepharmacy and telemedicine; iv) Pharmacokinetic monitoring; v) Transition to adult patient regimen; vi) Patient health education; vii) Surgery, emergency room and hospital admission; and viii) Outcome evaluation. All recommendations were assessed as appropriate and necessary by the external expert panel. CONCLUSIONS: Hemophilia patient journey is complex and depends on different variables. It also requires the involvement of different healthcare professionals who must act in a coordinated and integrated manner at all stages of the patient's life, adapted to their individual needs. On this matter, the identified and agreed recommendations may improve continuity and quality of care, as they facilitate the integration and coordination of the professionals involved in the management of this pathology, especially Hospital Pharmacy, Hematology and Nursing.

Consensus recommendations for the improvement of inter- and intra-centre care coordination in the management of hemophilia. / Consenso de recomendaciones para la mejora de la coordinación asistencial inter e intra-centros en el abordaje de la hemofilia.

OBJECTIVE: Define consensus recommendations to improve care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing, inter- and intra-center, in the care of haemophilia patients. METHOD: Recommendations for the improvement of care coordination in the management of haemophilia patients were identified and assessed by a multidisciplinary panel of professionals with experience in this field (Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing) and supported by scientific evidence. The identified recommendations were assessed by Rand/UCLA consensus methodology (Delphi-adapted) based on their appropriateness and, subsequently, on their necessity. In both cases, it was used ordinal Likert scale. Data were statistically analysed through different metrics. RESULTS: Fifty-three recommendations for the improvement of care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing in the management of haemophilia patients were identified, grouped into eight areas of action: i) Haemophilia units, reference centers and multidisciplinary care; ii) Role of Haematology, Hospital Pharmacy and Nursing in the patient journey of haemophilia patients; iii) Telepharmacy and telemedicine; iv) Pharmacokinetic monitoring; v) Transition to adult patient regimen; vi) Patient health education; vii) Surgery, emergency room and hospital admission; and viii) Outcome evaluation. All recommendations were assessed as appropriate and necessary by the external expert panel. CONCLUSIONS: Haemophilia patient journey is complex and depends on different variables. It also requires the involvement of different healthcare professionals who must act in a coordinated and integrated manner at all stages of the patient's life, adapted to their individual needs. On this matter, the identified and agreed recommendations may improve continuity and quality of care, as they facilitate the integration and coordination of the professionals involved in the management of this pathology, especially Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing.