Improved STR profiles from improvised explosive device (IED): fluorescence latent DNA detection and direct PCR.

Bombing accounts for the largest share of terrorist incidents worldwide. Most involve an improvised explosive device (IED): a bomb made from household items. Touch DNA may be left on parts of an IED during assembly. However, an IED conflagration degrades DNA, and there has never been a way to locate where touch DNA may remain. To solve this problem, we combined the use of fluorescent dye to locate latent DNA and direct PCR to improve STR profiles of DNA obtained from IEDs. Six fluorescent DNA-binding dyes were evaluated at various concentrations for the purpose of staining latent DNA. SYBR® Green I and Diamond™ Nucleic Acid dye were able to visualize touch DNA on IED substrates. Inhibition studies with extracted DNA and touch DNA using both dyes revealed that Diamond™ dye inhibited direct STR amplification, while SYBR® Green I did not. Stability studies at three temperatures showed optimum performance of SYBR® Green I up to 24 h after formulation. As such, only SYBR® Green I was further used to develop a "visualized-direct PCR" method. Using the conventional approach and the novel "visualized-direct PCR" approach in a single-blind investigation of mock IED evidence, the "visualized-direct PCR" approach had a 98.6% chance of obtaining more alleles (95% highest density interval (HDI): 0.7 to 10.0 alleles). A decrease in non-donor's alleles (mixed profiles) was also observed. The developed approach has the potential to revolutionize the process of STR typing from touch DNA.

Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.

Body fluids provide key pieces of information for a forensic investigation. However, sometimes only a small amount of body fluids is found and/or DNA are also degraded by environmental factors at the crime scene. In extreme cases, a forensic analyst may have to decide whether to perform a presumptive test on the stains or proceed straightaway to DNA profiling, which could be wasteful for non-biological stains. Additionally, due to the inefficient DNA extraction process, the amount of DNA may not be enough for STR typing, especially if parts of the evidence had been subjected to presumptive testing. To overcome these problems, we developed a direct PCR method for STR profiling of stains (blood, saliva, and semen) that had been subjected to presumptive tests and also those that had not undergone presumptive tests. Using the optimized protocols, 86 of 90 untreated samples (95.6%) resulted in a full DNA profile. For presumptively-tested samples, both the type of presumptive test used and the surfaces where the stains are deposited affected the quality of the STR profiles. With blood, we obtained full STR profiles from 88% of samples tested with luminol and 78% with Hemastix. The acid phosphatase test for semen and Phadebas test for saliva resulted in full STR profiles from 85% and 73% of samples, respectively. Different substrates also affected the resulting STR profiles, but there was no clear trend based on absorbency or texture. The interactions of types of body fluids, presumptive tests, and substrates must be considered together. Our direct PCR protocol can be used to detect DNA even with 6 months-old biological samples. The benefits of the developed protocol include increasing amount of DNA obtained from evidence, decreasing chances of DNA contamination from complex or lengthy extraction steps, using minimal sample amount for analysis, and most importantly, improving STR profiles. Also, the process could save analysis time and cost due to the omission of DNA extraction and quantification. Our developed method could be beneficial to cases with limited stains available, as forensic analysts can perform indirect presumptive testing on the suspected stains and direct PCR could be carried out from the filter paper used, thus leaving the original stain for subsequent DNA extraction or re-analysis.