[Early biological markers of anaphylactoid reactions occurring during anesthesia]. / Marqueurs biologiques précoces des réactions anaphylactoïdes peranesthésiques.

Three markers of in vivo histamine release, i.e. plasma histamine and tryptase, and urinary methylhistamine, were assessed using sensitive radioimmunoassays in 18 patients who had experienced an adverse reaction to an anaesthetic agent. Controls were obtained from 35 patients following a general anaesthetic, which included a muscle relaxant, and who remained free from any adverse reaction. A first blood sample was obtained from all 18 patients a mean 25 +/- 26 min after the reaction, and a second one in thirteen a mean 120 +/- 65 min after the reaction. Ten patients had had a life-threatening reaction. Plasma histamine levels were increased in all these cases, and tryptase concentrations in 9 out of 10. Urinary methylhistamine rarely reached pathological levels (4 out of 10). Skin tests were positive in the four tested patients. Plasma histamine concentration was still high in 8 cases thirty minutes after the reaction, and remained increased for more than 2 h in two patients. Among the other eight patients with a moderate reaction, 3 had high histamine levels, with normal or weakly increased tryptase concentrations, and normal urinary methylhistamine. Two of these patients had positive skin tests. There were no abnormal findings in any of the investigations carried out in the other five patients, except for a slightly positive skin test to atracurium in one patient. Plasma histamine had a higher sensitivity than tryptase levels. Methylhistamine concentrations were only rarely of interest. There were no false positives with the three investigated markers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Biochemical markers of anaphylactoid reactions to drugs. Comparison of plasma histamine and tryptase.

Adverse reactions to drugs require that their mechanisms be elucidated, particularly when anaphylaxis is suspected. Early diagnosis can be achieved by plasma histamine measurements. Unfortunately, the short plasma half-life of histamine and the difficulties in handling the sample usually preclude this measurement, although a sensitive radioimmunologic kit is routinely available. It has been recently suggested that mast cell tryptase, a component of the mast cell granules, could provide an alternative to histamine determination. We have measured plasma histamine and tryptase in 19 patients who developed possible anaphylactoid reactions to anesthetic or other drugs. Eight patients had increased values for both histamine and tryptase. In 4 a muscle relaxant drug was proved responsible for the reaction. Six patients had normal levels for both substances. In each case, the clinical signs of anaphylaxis were moderate. Two patients had normal histamine and high tryptase concentrations, due to late sampling (greater than 5 h). In 2 other patients, histamine was high, with normal tryptase: in 1, muscle relaxant allergy was further demonstrated. Tryptase half-life was equal to 90 min in 3 patients. At least 15 min was necessary to reach the peak level when the responsible drug was administered intravenously. The best time for measuring tryptase was 1-2 h after the reaction (not greater than 6 h), whereas for histamine it was 10 min to 1 h. We conclude that measurement of plasma tryptase along with measurement of plasma histamine may aid in diagnosis of anaphylaxis.