Optimized Tourniquet Use in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative, Prospective, and Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: The results of recent studies investigating tourniquet (TNQ) use for knee arthroplasty are controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to compare patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who did not have a TNQ to those in whom an optimized TNQ protocol was applied. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 127 patients who had knee osteoarthritis who had undergone total knee arthroplasty and randomized them into two groups: "without TNQ" and "optimized TNQ" (TNQ inflation before skin incision, deflation after cementing, with pressure one hundred millimeters of mercury above the systolic blood pressure, and without articular suction drain usage). The means of surgery and TNQ duration, blood loss, number of blood transfusions, degree of pain, edema, range of motion (ROM), functional score over time, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in terms of surgical timing, blood loss, thigh and knee pain, edema, ROM, functional scores, and complications between the "without TNQ" and "optimized TNQ" groups. CONCLUSION: The use of an optimized TNQ in primary total knee arthroplasty presents similar clinical results to surgery without a TNQ and did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications. Its use allowed surgery to occur with the benefits of a clean and dry surgical field provided by TNQ without increasing procedure-related comorbidities.

The influence of a fast ramp rate on peak cardiopulmonary parameters during arm crank ergometry.

The influence of a very fast ramp rate on cardiopulmonary variables at ventilatory threshold and peak exercise during a maximal arm crank exercise test has not been extensively studied. Considering that short arm crank tests could be sufficient to achieve maximal oxygen consumption (VO2), it would be of practical interest to explore this possibility. Thus, this study aimed to analyse the influence of a fast ramp rate (20 W min⁻¹) on the cardiopulmonary responses of healthy individuals during a maximal arm crank ergometry test. Seventeen healthy individuals performed maximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests (Ultima CardiO2; Medical Graphics Corporation, St Louis, USA) in arm ergometer (Angio, LODE, Groningen, The Netherlands) following two protocols in random order: fast protocol (increment: 2 w/6 s) and slow protocol (increment: 1 w/6 s). The fast protocol was repeated 60-90 days after the 1st test to evaluate protocol reproducibility. Both protocols elicited the same peak VO2 (fast: 23.51 ± 6.00 versus slow: 23.28 ± 7.77 ml kg⁻¹ min⁻¹; P = 0.12) but peak power load in the fast ramp protocol was higher than the one in the slow ramp protocol (119 ± 43 versus. 102 ± 39 W, P < 0.001). There was no other difference in ventilatory threshold and peak exercise variables when 1st and 2nd fast protocols were compared. Fast protocol seems to be useful when healthy young individuals perform arm cardiopulmonary exercise test. The usefulness of this protocol in other populations remains to be evaluated.