Subcutaneous Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Home-Based Palliative Care: "It's as Straightforward as Pushing a Button, Right at my Fingertips".

Subcutaneous patient-controlled analgesia (SCPCA) in home-based palliative care is a potentially valuable option for providing effective pain relief to some patients, particularly when conventional analgesic approaches prove ineffective or are refused. Our case report illustrates the use of SPCA for the management of breakthrough pain in a patient receiving palliative care at home with no improvement after multiple previous treatments. SCPCA was found to be safe and successful. Future research is essential to explore its precise role, appropriate indications, prescription guidelines, and safety considerations across various palliative care contexts.

Treatment of Lower Extremity Edema by Controlled Subcutaneous Drainage at Home: A Case Report.

Lower severe edema is a common condition faced by advanced cancer patients with an impact on comfort, quality of life, and care planning. Diuresis and mechanical interventions are the mainstream options for the treatment of edema, but, although effective, may not be indicated for frail, bed-bound, and dependent patients cared for in the community setting.We present a case report of a young female with severe edema to her right lower limb, which accepted controlled subcutaneous fluid drainage at her home. Subcutaneous fluid drainage at home was effective, safe, and feasible and improved the patient's comfort and well-being.

Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.

INTRODUCTION: Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians' capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians' perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a systematic review of qualitative research where PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science will be searched, supplemented with manual searches of reference lists of included studies. Qualitative studies published in Portuguese, Spanish and English language will be included, with no date limit. Studies will be eligible when they evaluate family physicians' perspectives, opinions or perceptions on decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. The methodological quality of studies selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers before inclusion in the review using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis will be used to identify key categories and themes from the qualitative data. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach will be used to assess how much confidence to place in findings from the qualitative evidence synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will use published data. No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings will be disseminated to the medical community via journal publication and conference presentation(s). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: ID 91978.