Deriving a dose and regimen for anti-glucosaminidase antibody passive-immunisation for patients with Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) osteomyelitis remains a major clinical problem. Anti-glucosaminidase (Gmd) antibodies (1C11) are efficacious in prophylactic and therapeutic murine models. Feasibility, safety and pharmacokinetics of 1C11 passive immunisation in sheep and endogenous anti-Gmd levels were quantified in osteomyelitis patients. 3 sheep received a 500 mg intravenous (i.v.) bolus of 1C11 and its levels in sera were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) over 52 d. A humanised anti-Gmd monoclonal antibody, made by grafting the antigen-binding fragment (Fab) portion of 1C11 onto the fragment crystallisable region (Fc) of human IgG1, was used to make a standard curve of mean fluorescent intensity versus concentration of anti-Gmd. Anti-Gmd serum levels were determined in 297 patients with culture-confirmed S. aureus osteomyelitis and 40 healthy controls. No complications or adverse events were associated with the sheep 1C11 i.v. infusion and the estimated circulating half-life of 1C11 was 23.7 d. Endogenous anti-Gmd antibody levels in sera of osteomyelitis patients ranged from < 1 ng/mL to 300 µg/mL, with a mean concentration of 21.7 µg/mL. The estimated circulating half-life of endogenous anti-Gmd antibodies in sera of 12 patients with cured osteomyelitis was 120.4 d. A clinically relevant administration of anti-Gmd (500 mg i.v. = 7 mg/kg/70 kg human) was safe in sheep. This dose was 8 times more than the endogenous anti-Gmd levels observed in osteomyelitis patients and was predicted to have a half-life of > 3 weeks. Anti-Gmd passive immunisation has potential to prevent and treat S. aureus osteomyelitis. Further clinical development is warranted.

A systematic review of animal models for Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) osteomyelitis is a significant complication for orthopaedic patients undergoing surgery, particularly with fracture fixation and arthroplasty. Given the difficulty in studying S. aureus infections in human subjects, animal models serve an integral role in exploring the pathogenesis of osteomyelitis, and aid in determining the efficacy of prophylactic and therapeutic treatments. Animal models should mimic the clinical scenarios seen in patients as closely as possible to permit the experimental results to be translated to the corresponding clinical care. To help understand existing animal models of S. aureus, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE to identify in vivo animal experiments that have investigated the management of S. aureus osteomyelitis in the context of fractures and metallic implants. In this review, experimental studies are categorised by animal species and are further classified by the setting of the infection. Study methods are summarised and the relevant advantages and disadvantages of each species and model are discussed. While no ideal animal model exists, the understanding of a model's strengths and limitations should assist clinicians and researchers to appropriately select an animal model to translate the conclusions to the clinical setting.