Laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to update evidence on the effectiveness and safety of laser therapy for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). Data sources: Manuscripts published until May 2023 were systematically searched in PubMed; Embase; Scopus; Web of Science; CENTRAL; CINAHL; and clinical trial databases (www.trialscentral.org, www.controlled-trials.com, and clinicaltrials.gov), with no language and year of publication restriction. Studies selection: RCTs with women diagnosed with GSM, and the intervention was vaginal laser therapy (CO2-laser or Er: YAG-laser) comparing with placebo (sham therapy), no treatment or vaginal estrogen therapy. Data collection: Two authors evaluated the publications for inclusion based on the title and abstract, followed by reviewing the relevant full-text articles. Disagreements during the review process were addressed by consensus, with the involvement of a third author. Data synthesis: Twelve RCTs, representing a total of 5147 participants, were included in this review. Vaginal health index (VHI) significantly improved in the carbon dioxide laser (CO2-laser) therapy group (MD=2.21; 95% CI=1.25 to 3.16), while dyspareunia (MD=-0.85; 95% CI=-1.59 to -0.10), dryness (MD=-0.62; 95% CI=-1.12 to -0.12) and burning (MD= -0.64; 95% CI=-1.28 to -0.01) decreased. No serious adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: CO2-laser increases VHI score and decreases dyspareunia, dryness and burning, especially when compared to sham-laser. However, the certainty of the evidence is low, thus preventing the recommendation of laser therapy for GSM management.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in cervical cancer: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: This paper reports a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol that will be used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, alone or combined with bevacizumab and other therapies, in adult women with cervical carcinoma from stage IB2 onwards. METHODS: The protocol follows PRISMA-P recommendations and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024531233). The search will be conducted without restrictions on language and year of publication in the following databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cancerlit, The World Health Organization (WHO), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Grey literature will be searched using the following sources: Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and Opengrey. Manual search will be carried out for the reference lists of eligible studies. The studies will be selected independently by two reviewers and all completed or ongoing randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, used alone or combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, bevacizumab or surgery, in adult women diagnosed with cervical cancer, will be included. The data extraction will include population characteristics, type of treatment and main outcomes of studies. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0. The certainty of the evidence will be rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). CONCLUSIONS: The findings will be presented in narrative summary tables and a quantitative synthesis will be conducted using the 'meta' package of R software, version 4.3.1. This future systematic review may contribute with quality evidence for clinical decision-making on the use of pembrolizumab in women with cervical cancer.

Laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Abstract Objective: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to update evidence on the effectiveness and safety of laser therapy for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). Data sources: Manuscripts published until May 2023 were systematically searched in PubMed; Embase; Scopus; Web of Science; CENTRAL; CINAHL; and clinical trial databases (www.trialscentral.org, www.controlled-trials.com, and clinicaltrials.gov), with no language and year of publication restriction. Studies selection: RCTs with women diagnosed with GSM, and the intervention was vaginal laser therapy (CO2-laser or Er: YAG-laser) comparing with placebo (sham therapy), no treatment or vaginal estrogen therapy. Data collection: Two authors evaluated the publications for inclusion based on the title and abstract, followed by reviewing the relevant full-text articles. Disagreements during the review process were addressed by consensus, with the involvement of a third author. Data synthesis: Twelve RCTs, representing a total of 5147 participants, were included in this review. Vaginal health index (VHI) significantly improved in the carbon dioxide laser (CO2-laser) therapy group (MD=2.21; 95% CI=1.25 to 3.16), while dyspareunia (MD=−0.85; 95% CI=−1.59 to −0.10), dryness (MD=−0.62; 95% CI=−1.12 to −0.12) and burning (MD= −0.64; 95% CI=−1.28 to −0.01) decreased. No serious adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: CO2-laser increases VHI score and decreases dyspareunia, dryness and burning, especially when compared to sham-laser. However, the certainty of the evidence is low, thus preventing the recommendation of laser therapy for GSM management.

Effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Ivermectin is a drug with antiviral properties and has been proposed as an alternative treatment for patients with COVID-19, in some countries; however, there is limited evidence to support its clinical use. Accordingly, the aim of this review and meta-analysis is to obtain superior evidence on the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in treatment of COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search in the medical databases and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for randomised clinical trials and quasi-randomised trials published from December 2019. The criteria for inclusion are that infection needs to be confirmed by a real-time PCR or serology test, and the effect of ivermectin has been compared with placebo, symptomatic treatment or no treatment. We will exclude observational studies and clinical trials that involved patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, but without a laboratorial diagnosis. Outcomes of interest include mortality, time to symptom resolution, time of hospitalisation, frequency of invasive mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome, admission to intensive care unit, viral load, PCR-negative status, percentage of infection after prophylactic use, and total incidence of adverse and side effects. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two reviewers will independently select the studies and assess their eligibility. Two other reviewers will independently extract data from each study. Meta-analysis will then be carried out using fixed-effects or random-effects model, using the mean difference for continuous outcomes and the relative risk for dichotomous outcomes. Bias risk will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The quality of evidence for each outcome will be assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Review Manager V.5.3.5 will be used for synthesis and subgroup analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Owing to the nature of the review, ethical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020197395.