Feasibility and safety of bipolar radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous image-guided abdominal biopsy procedures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of using a bipolar radiofrequency track cautery device during percutaneous image-guided abdominal biopsy procedures in at-risk patients. METHODS: Forty-two patients (26-79 years old; female 44%) with at least one bleeding risk factor who underwent an abdominal image-guided (CT or US) biopsy and intended bipolar radiofrequency track cautery (BRTC) were retrospectively studied. An 18G radiofrequency electrode was inserted through a 17G biopsy introducer needle immediately following coaxial 18G core biopsy, to cauterize the biopsy track using temperature control. Bleeding risk factors, technical success, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: BRTC was technically successful in 41/42 (98%) of procedures; in one patient, the introducer needle retracted from the liver due to respiratory motion prior to BRTC. BRTC following percutaneous biopsy was applied during 41 abdominal biopsy procedures (renal mass = 12, renal parenchyma = 10, liver mass = 9, liver parenchyma = 5, splenic mass or parenchyma = 4, gastrohepatic mass = 1). All patients had one or more of the following risk factors: high-risk organ (spleen or renal parenchyma), hypervascular mass, elevated prothrombin time, renal insufficiency, thrombocytopenia, recent anticoagulation or anticoagulation not withheld for recommended interval, cirrhosis, intraprocedural hypertension, brisk back bleeding observed from the introducer needle, or subcapsular tumor location. No severe adverse events (grade 3 or higher) occurred. Two (2/41, 5%) mild (grade 1) bleeding events did not cause symptoms or require intervention. CONCLUSION: Bipolar radiofrequency track cautery was feasible and safe during percutaneous image-guided abdominal biopsy procedures. IRB approval: MBG 2022P002277.

Development, Implementation, and Assessment of a Quality, Research, Education, and Wellness (QREW) Professional Development Lecture Series for Radiology Faculty.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Professional development is important to academic radiologists. We developed, implemented, and assessed an internal professional development lecture series focusing on the non-interpretative themes of Quality, Research, Education, and Wellness (QREW). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The faculty of a 29-member abdominal radiology division at an academic hospital were invited to deliver 1-hour virtual lectures on noninterpretative topics to division colleagues. Topics were curated by division leadership based on the perceived needs of faculty. Anonymous feedback was collected from attendees for quality improvement purposes and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Over 17 months, 13 QREW lectures were delivered. In total, 91 feedback forms were completed by faculty (mean 7 forms, range 2-12 per session). Of these, 57 responses (63%) were by those <7 years post training ("junior faculty"), 34 responses (37%) by those ≥ 7 years from training ("senior faculty"). Most respondents reported low levels of prior instruction (80/90, 89%) and personal knowledge (49/91, 54%) on topics. Compared to senior faculty, a greater proportion of junior faculty reported less prior instruction (73% vs 98%, P < 0.001) and less personal knowledge (32% vs 65%, P < 0.01). Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the topics were important to their clinical practice (87/90, 97%), professional development (86/90, 96%), and personal well-being (82/91, 90%). Faculty identified the QREW program as a major contributor to their professional development. CONCLUSION: A noninterpretative professional development lecture series delivered by radiology faculty in a virtual, interactive format is feasible and effective, particularly for junior faculty.

Can 3-Phase Computed Tomography Urography Be Used to Characterize Adrenal Nodules? Results in 145 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine whether computed tomography (CT) urography (CTU) can characterize incidental adrenal nodules. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed at an academic medical center. Patients were identified by free text search of CTU reports that contained the terms "adrenal mass" "adrenal nodule" and "adrenal lesion." Computed tomography urography technique consisted of unenhanced images and postcontrast images obtained at 100 seconds and 15 minutes. The final cohort included 145 patients with 151 adrenal nodules. Nodules were considered lipid-rich adenomas or myelolipomas based on unenhanced imaging characteristics. Absolute and relative washout values were calculated for the remaining nodules, using a cutoff of 60% and 40%, respectively, to diagnose adenomas. Reference standard for lipid-poor adenomas and malignant nodules was histopathology or imaging/clinical follow-up. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous variables, and Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. RESULTS: One hundred nodules were lipid-rich adenomas and 3 were myelolipomas. Forty-eight nodules were indeterminate at unenhanced CT, corresponding to 39 lipid-poor adenomas and 9 malignant nodules based on reference standards. Both absolute and relative washout correctly characterized 71% of nodules (34/48), with a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 89%. Overall, 91% of all adrenal nodules (137/151) were correctly characterized by CTU alone. Lipid-poor adenomas were smaller than malignant nodules ( P < 0.01) and were lower in attenuation on unenhanced and delayed images ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adrenal nodules detected at 3-phase CTU can be accurately characterized, potentially eliminating the need for subsequent adrenal protocol CT or magnetic resonance imaging.

Clinical course and outcome among patients with acute pancreatitis and COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The data on clinical course and outcome of acute pancreatitis among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are sparse. In this study, we analyzed the clinical profiles of patients with COVID 19 and acute pancreatitis. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on Research Patient Data Registry data which was pooled from five Mass General Brigham Healthcare Network hospitals. We extracted data on demographics, symptoms, ICU transfer, mechanical ventilation, laboratories' profiles, imaging findings, and patient outcomes. RESULT: Of 985 screened adult patients, 17 were eligible for the study, 9 (52.9%) were admitted primarily for respiratory failure and developed acute pancreatitis after a median of 22.5 days (13-76 days) from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. On contrary, eight patients presented with typical symptoms and were diagnosed with acute pancreatitis, the majority with mild severity (62.5%) on admission. Patients who were admitted primarily with severe COVID-19 illness were younger (median age 57 vs. 63 years), females (55.6 vs. 25%), of Hispanic ethnicity (55.6 vs. 25%), and obese (88.9 vs. 37.5%). The median peak lipase, C reactive protein, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer were higher among patients who developed acute pancreatitis later during hospitalization. Patients who developed acute pancreatitis later also experienced higher episodes of necrotizing pancreatitis (11.1% vs. 0), thromboembolic complications (55.6 vs. 12.5%), and higher mortality (37.5 vs. 12.5%). CONCLUSION: Acute pancreatitis is not common among patients with COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 who had acute pancreatitis on admission had more benign course and overall better outcome as compared to the patients who developed acute pancreatitis during hospitalization.

Trainee and Attending Perspectives on Remote Radiology Readouts in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Social distancing mandates due to COVID-19 have necessitated adaptations to radiology trainee workflow and educational practices, including the radiology "readout." We describe how a large academic radiology department achieved socially distant "remote readouts," provide trainee and attending perspectives on this early experience, and propose ways by which "remote readouts" can be used effectively by training programs beyond COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beginning March 2020, radiologists were relocated to workspaces outside of conventional reading rooms. Information technologies were employed to allow for "remote readouts" between trainees and attendings. An optional anonymous open-ended survey regarding remote readouts was administered to radiology trainees and attendings as a quality improvement initiative. From the responses, response themes were abstracted using thematic analysis. Descriptive statistics of the qualitative data were calculated. RESULTS: Radiologist workstations from 14 traditional reading rooms were relocated to 36 workspaces across the hospital system. Two models of remote readouts, synchronous and asynchronous, were developed, facilitated by commercially available information technologies. Thirty-nine of 105 (37%) trainees and 42 of 90 (47%) attendings responded to the survey. Main response themes included: social distancing, technology, autonomy/competency, efficiency, education/feedback and atmosphere/professional relationship. One hundred and forty-eight positive versus 97 negative comments were reported. Social distancing, technology, and autonomy/competency were most positively rated. Trainees and attending perspectives differed regarding the efficiency of remote readouts. CONCLUSION: "Remote readouts," compliant with social distancing measures, are feasible in academic radiology practice settings. Perspectives from our initial experience provide insight into how this can be accomplished, opportunities for improvement and future application, beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.