RESUMO
Introduction Fixed prosthodontic treatment involves the replacement of missing tooth structures with a variety of materials. Several newer metal-free ceramics have been developed in recent years to meet patients' aesthetic needs. The long-term performance of all ceramics, however, is unknown, necessitating a continuous evaluation of the materials' strength. Aim The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the fracture resistance of IPS E max pressable crowns and graphene crowns, which are luted with Rely X U200 self-adhesive resin cement on the respective dies, as well as thermocycling of IPS E max pressable crowns and thermocycling of graphene crowns. The current review was conducted as an in vitro examination at the Division of Prosthodontics, GSL Dental School, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India. Materials and methods On a typodont tooth, a shoulder finish line design was prepared and incisal reduction was performed. The tooth was scanned, designed, and milled to produce 18 metal dies made of cobalt-chrome alloy. These metal dies produced a total of (n=36) all-ceramic crowns, which were divided into two groups based on crown type: 18 IPS E max crowns and 18 graphene crowns. The participants were once again divided into two subgroups within each group, with the purpose of assessing fracture resistance. This evaluation was conducted using a universal testing machine both before and after subjecting the specimens to thermocycling. The obtained data were sent for statistical analysis. Results Fracture resistance values were reduced after thermocycling of both IPS E max and Graphene crowns. Without thermocycling, the fracture resistance values of IPS E max crowns were higher than those of graphene crowns. Conclusions The fracture resistance of IPS E max crowns exhibited a statistically significant increase when compared to graphene crowns. Additionally, it was shown that the fracture resistance of both materials was reduced upon exposure to thermocycling.
