Intercenter variability in outcome for patients treated with direct coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Direct coronary angioplasty is an effective therapy for acute myocardial infarction, but its success may be dependent on both ready availability and operator skill. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the center performing direct coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction while controlling for parameters known to affect outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group consisted of 99 patients with ST elevation who were treated with direct angioplasty in four high-volume centers. Patients were injected with technetium-99m sestamibi intravenously and then taken to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Antegrade flow was graded before and after direct coronary angioplasty. Single photon emission computed tomography was performed 1 to 6 hours after injection to measure myocardium at risk and residual blood flow to the jeopardized zone using previously published quantitative methods. A repeat sestamibi injection and tomographic acquisition were performed at hospital discharge to measure actual infarct size. There were no significant differences by center for baseline clinical characteristics, mean myocardium at risk (29% to 37% left ventricle [LV]), time to reperfusion (3.1 to 4.1 hours), residual blood flow, infarct location, or antegrade flow. Despite these similarities, there were differences in outcome measures by center. Mean infarct size was as follows: center 1, 15%; center 2, 12%; center 3, 10%, center 4, 23% (all LV; p = 0.11 ). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction at discharge also demonstrated significant differences: center 1, 0.57; center 2, 0.47; center 3, 0.53; center 4, 0.47 (p = 0.002). The prevalence of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow after angioplasty significantly differed by center: center 1, 92%; center 2, 94%; center 3, 87%; center 4, 71 %; (p = 0.01). There was a low mortality rate for all four centers ranging from 0% to 6%. After adjustment for myocardium at risk, residual blood flow, and time to reperfusion, the primary outcome of the center where the angioplasty was performed was an independent determinant of both infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: The success of direct coronary angioplasty in reducing infarct size and preserving left ventricular function depends on the center performing the procedure. Direct measurement of the effectiveness of this reperfusion modality in community practice is required to assess the impact of this effect.

Noninvasive prediction of residual blood flow within the risk area during acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter validation study of patients undergoing direct coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study from a single center, radionuclide measures of collateral flow with technetium 99m sestamibi have been shown to be significantly associated with angiographic residual (antegrade and collateral) flow and independent predictors of final infarct size in acute myocardial infarction. This study examined whether the previously described radionuclide measures of blood flow to the infarct zone were reproducible with different laboratories and imaging systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: Residual flow to the infarct zone was assessed by both invasive and noninvasive methods in 77 patients with first-time myocardial infarction (32 anterior, 45 nonanterior). All patients underwent acute coronary angiography before any intervention within 8 hours of the onset of chest pain (4.0 +/- 1.5 hours; range 1.2 to 7.9 hours). 99mTc sestamibi was injected intravenously before reperfusion therapy, and tomographic imaging was performed 1 to 6 hours after injection. A central core laboratory processed the acquired images from three centers, each with a unique camera and computer system. Three previously published methods based on the severity of the acute perfusion defect were used to measure residual flow to the infarct zone (nadir, severity index, area). Antegrade (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow) and collateral flow before direct angioplasty were blindly graded on a four-point scale (0 to 3) from the acute angiogram. The simple sum of the two grades was defined as the angiographic flow index, representing residual flow to the jeopardized zone. All three noninvasive measures of residual flow were highly associated with the angiographic flow index in a linear fashion: severity index (p = 0.0006), area (p = 0.003), and nadir (minimum/maximum counts; p = 0.004). This association was independent of the laboratory where the data were acquired. CONCLUSIONS: Despite different laboratories and camera systems, radionuclide measures of residual flow were highly associated with the angiographic flow index before reperfusion therapy. These results suggest that these measures are applicable on a broader scale for the noninvasive determination of collateral and antegrade flow in acute myocardial infarction.

Temporal variability of color Doppler jet areas in patients with mitral and aortic regurgitation.

The temporal variability of color flow jets during regurgitation has not been systematically examined. We therefore analyzed color Doppler images in 52 patients (29 with mitral regurgitation and 23 with aortic regurgitation) for frame-to-frame variability in the size of the regurgitant color jet. Planimetered jet areas varied markedly throughout the flow period, with the difference between the largest and smallest mitral regurgitant jets ranging from 1.1 to 11.9 cm2 in individual patients. Maximal and minimal aortic regurgitant jets varied from 1.5 to 6.6 cm2 between frames. The point during the cardiac cycle at which the largest regurgitant jet area was recorded also varied markedly for mitral and aortic lesions. Mitral regurgitant jets peaked at 51% of systole, with a range from 9% to 100%. The point during diastole at which the maximal aortic regurgitant jet was recorded varied from 2% to 84%, with a mean of 31.2% of the diastolic period. The persistence of the flow disturbance was examined as the percent of systole or diastole during which the maximal jet area remained at least 50% or 75% of its maximal size. Mitral regurgitant jets remained at least one-half maximal size for a mean of 60.7% (range, 20% to 90%) of systole, but remained at 75% of maximal size for a mean of only 39% of systole. Aortic regurgitant jets persisted at over one-half maximal size for a mean of 63.2% (range, 30% to 90%) of diastole, but sustained 75% of maximal size for a mean of only 44% of diastole.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Value and limitations of Doppler pressure half-time in quantifying mitral stenosis: a comparison with micromanometer catheter recordings.

The purpose of this study was to compare the Doppler and catheterization pressure half-time methods of estimating mitral valve area with valve areas obtained by the Gorlin equation in a group of patients with clinically significant mitral stenosis. Data were analyzed from 67 consecutive patients who were undergoing continuous-wave Doppler examination and catheterization with micromanometer catheters. Doppler pressure half-time was calculated as the interval between peak transmitral velocity and velocity divided by the square root of 2, as measured from the outer border of the spectral envelope. Doppler mitral valve area (MVA) was obtained with the equation: MVA = 220 divided by pressure half-time. For catheterization data, the pressure half-time was measured directly from simultaneously recorded left ventricular and left atrial pressure (18 patients) or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (49 patients). The catheterization half-time was taken as the time required for the peak pressure gradient to fall to one half of the initial value. Calculations of the mitral valve area at catheterization were obtained by the Gorlin equation with pressure gradient and cardiac output determinations. Mitral valve area as determined by the Gorlin equation for all cases ranged from 0.4 to 2.0 (mean = 1.03 +/- 0.37) cm2. Linear regression analysis that compared cardiac catheterization and Doppler half-times yielded r = 0.68. For the subgroup of patients with sinus rhythm, the correlation improved to r = 0.76.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Relation of echocardiographic morphology of the mitral apparatus to mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse: assessment by Doppler color flow imaging.

Few data exist regarding the relationship of valvular anatomy and coaptation to the presence of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Therefore this study was undertaken to assess the ability of two-dimensional echocardiographic features of mitral valve morphology to predict the presence, direction, and magnitude of MR as assessed by color Doppler flow imaging. MR was present in 21 of 46 patients with MVP on two-dimensional echocardiography. Echocardiograms were specifically evaluated for leaflet apposition, leaflet morphology, and mitral anulus diameter. Color flow images were analyzed for presence of MR, direction of the regurgitant jet, and area encompassing the largest jet visible in any view. Abnormal mitral leaflet coaptation on two-dimensional echocardiography was strongly associated with the presence of MR (p = 0.003), being present in 15 of 21 patients with as compared with 5 of 25 patients without MR. Similarly, mitral leaflet thickness and MR were closely associated (p = 0.0035), with the latter being present in 9 of 30 patients with normal and 12 of 16 patients with excessive leaflet thickness. MR jet direction tended to be anterior to central with posterior leaflet prolapse and posterior or central with anterior leaflet prolapse (p = 0.02). Maximal jet area of MR tended to be larger in patients with compared with those without mitral annular dilatation (5.4 +/- 2.3 versus 2.1 +/- 1.9 cm2, p = 0.001), and in those with abnormal rather than normal leaflet thickness (4.5 +/- 2.7 versus 2.0 +/- 1.6 cm2, p = 0.009). Thus the presence, direction, and size of MR jets in MVP are related to structural abnormality of the mitral apparatus on echocardiography.

Effect of isometric exercise on mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by color Doppler flow imaging.

Isometric exercise produces well-defined hemodynamic changes in normal and diseased states. However, the effect of isometrics on the degree of valvular regurgitation recorded by color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) has not been reported. CDFI was therefore used to evaluate changes in valvular regurgitation in 34 patients, mean age 53 +/- 16 years. Data were collected for 43 regurgitant lesions including 20 cases of aortic regurgitation and 23 cases of mitral regurgitation. Isometrics produced a significant increase in heart rate (71 to 83 beats/min) and blood pressure (132/64 to 153/70 mm Hg) in all patients (p less than 0.0001). Regurgitant jet area by CDFI increased significantly in both aortic regurgitation (4.5 to 6.2 cm2, p less than 0.0001) and mitral regurgitation (6.2 to 8.2 cm2, p less than 0.001). Patients taking concurrent vasodilator or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy had similar responses to those not receiving long-term therapy. Thus, CDFI detects an increase in aortic and mitral regurgitant jet area induced by isometric exertion. The change in CDFI jet area with handgrip demonstrates the influence of loading conditions on the size of a regurgitant jet area, and suggests that isometric exertion may increase the magnitude of mitral and aortic regurgitation.

Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow imaging: angiographic and hemodynamic correlations.

This study was performed to test the hypothesis that measurements of jet area by Doppler color flow imaging can predict the angiographic severity and hemodynamic consequences of mitral regurgitation. Doppler color flow imaging was performed in 47 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and left ventriculography. The jet area was measured as the largest clearly definable flow disturbance in the parasternal and apical views, and expressed as the maximal jet area, the mean of the largest jet area (average jet area) in two views or as the ratio of these measures to left atrial area. Correlation of all Doppler color flow measurements with angiographic grades of mitral regurgitation were comparable, maximal jet area being closest at r = 0.76. A maximal jet area greater than 8 cm2 predicted severe mitral regurgitation with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 94%, whereas a maximal jet area less than 4 cm2 predicted mild mitral regurgitation with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 75%, respectively. All patients with an average jet area greater than 8 cm2 manifested severe mitral regurgitation. However, jet area measurements showed limited correlation with regurgitant volume and fraction (r = 0.55 and 0.62, respectively) for maximal jet area, and were not predictive of hemodynamic abnormalities, including those of pulmonary wedge pressure, stroke volume or ventricular volumes. Thus, in patients with mitral regurgitation, maximal jet area from Doppler color flow imaging provides a simple measurement that predicts angiographic grade, but manifests a weak correlation with regurgitant volume and does not predict hemodynamic dysfunction.

Observer variability in the quantitation of Doppler color flow jet areas for mitral and aortic regurgitation.

Early studies using Doppler color flow imaging have suggested that measurement of the regurgitant jet area provides information regarding the severity of valvular insufficiency. This study was performed to assess the observer variability of mitral and aortic regurgitant jet area measurements using the Doppler color technique. Color Doppler recordings from 45 patients were reviewed: 23 patients had aortic regurgitation and 22 had mitral regurgitation. To assess interobserver variability, the largest definable mitral regurgitant jets from three cardiac cycles were independently chosen and measured by planimetry by two observers who were unaware of other patient information. Measurements were repeated by both observers at a separate time to obtain intraobserver data. Videotapes from 23 patients with aortic regurgitation were similarly analyzed. Each observer measured the isovolumic aortic jet (before mitral valve opening) and the maximal aortic regurgitant jet (at any time during diastole) using computer-assisted planimetry. Both intraobserver and interobserver correlations were excellent for mitral regurgitant jet areas (r = 0.97 and r = 0.93, respectively). The intraobserver correlation for isovolumic aortic regurgitant jet was r = 0.73; the interobserver correlation for this measurement was only fair (r = 0.57). For the maximal aortic regurgitant jet area, intraobserver correlation was good (r = 0.86) and interobserver correlation was fair (r = 0.72). These findings suggest that intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility are acceptable for the measurement of mitral regurgitant jet area.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)