Food craving in daily life: comparison of overweight and normal-weight participants with ecological momentary assessment.

BACKGROUND: The present study examined food cravings in daily life by comparing overweight and normal-weight participants right before eating events and at non-eating moments. It was hypothesised that overweight participants would have (i) more frequent, (ii) stronger and (iii) a greater variety of high-caloric palatable food cravings, and also would (iv) consume more high-caloric palatable foods, than normal-weight participants. METHODS: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) was used to assess food craving strength and frequency, variety of specific food cravings, and food intake. Fifty-seven overweight and 43 normal-weight adult participants were assessed at eating events and at an average of eight random non-eating moments per day for 2 weeks. Foods were categorised as: high-caloric high palatable foods (HCHP), fruits and salads, staple food dishes and sandwiches, and soups and yoghurts. RESULTS: Overweight participants reported more frequent HCHP food cravings specifically at non-eating moments than did normal-weight participants. Normal-weight participants reported more food cravings for staple foods, specifically at eating events. Moreover, overweight participants craved a greater variety of HCHP foods than normal-weight participants at both eating events and random non-eating moments. No other significant between-group differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance for obesity interventions (i) to specifically target high-caloric palatable food cravings that are experienced during the day and are not tied to eating moments and (ii) to aim for a reduction in the variety of high-caloric palatable food cravings. It might be fruitful to deliver treatment aimed at reducing cravings via mobile devices because this allows for easy individual tailoring and timing of interventions.

Deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry in the assessment of spermatogenesis.

PURPOSE: We compared deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) flow cytometric analysis of testicular tissue to quantitative assessment of spermatogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 35 infertile men with azoospermia or oligospermia. All patients underwent incisional testicular biopsies. DNA flow cytometric analysis was performed on each specimen to evaluate the ability of the method to quantify alterations in spermatogenesis. The results were compared to quantitative histological examination. At least 100 spermatic tubules were examined on each specimen and the number of spermatids per tubule was counted. All histological specimens were examined by the same pathologist. RESULTS: Of the 35 specimens analyzed with DNA flow cytometry 5 were normal, while the percentage of haploid cells (spermatids and spermatozoa) was decreased (hypospermatogenesis) in 14, complete maturation arrest was noted in 2 and almost complete absence of haploid cells was found in 14. Comparing the findings on histological examination with histograms, excellent correlation was noted in cases of the Sertoli-cell-only syndrome and complete maturation arrest, while 3 of 14 histograms with hypospermatogenesis demonstrated normal spermatogenesis on histological examination. Additionally 1 of 5 histograms with norma, spermatogenesis demonstrated hypospermatogenesis on histological examination. CONCLUSIONS: DNA flow cytometry of the testicular tissue seems to be an objective and quantified method that can be used to investigate spermatogenesis in infertile men. It is also less time-consuming than any histological examination, permits management decisions within 1.5 hours after biopsy and may replace testicular histopathological study. Flow cytometric diagnoses correlated well with histopathological findings.