Comparison of patient dose from routine multi-phase and dynamic liver perfusion CT studies taking into account the effect of iodinated contrast administration.

OBJECTIVES: To accurately determine and compare patient radiation burden from routine multi-phase CT (MPCT) and dynamic CT liver perfusion (CTLP) studies taking into account the effect of iodine uptake of exposed tissues/organs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 consecutive MPCT of upper abdomen and 40 consecutive CTLP studies performed on a modern CT scanner were retrospectively studied. Iodine uptake of radiosensitive tissues at the time of acquisition was calculated through the difference of tissues' CT numbers between NECT and CECT images. Monte Carlo simulation and mathematical anthropomorphic phantoms were employed to derive patient-size-specific organ dose data from each scan involved taking into account the effect of iodinated contrast uptake on absorbed dose. Effective dose estimates were derived for routine multiphase CT and CTLP by summing up the contribution of NECT and CECT scans involved. RESULTS: The mean underestimation error in organ doses from CECT exposures if iodine uptake is not encountered was found to be 2.2%-38.9%. The effective dose to an average-size patient from routine 3-phase CT, 4-phase CT and CTLP studies was found to be 20.6, 27.7 and 25.8 mSv, respectively. Effective dose from CTLP was found lower than 4-phase CT of upper abdomen irrespective of patient body size. Compared to 3-phase CT, the radiation burden from CTLP was found to be higher for average size-patients but again lower for overweight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Modern CT technology allows CTLP studies at comparable or even lower patient radiation burden compared to routine multi-phase liver CT imaging.

What is the underestimation of radiation dose to the pediatric thyroid gland from contrast enhanced CT, if contrast medium uptake is not taken into account?

PURPOSE: To assess the underestimation of radiation dose to the thyroid of children undergoing contrast enhanced CT if contrast medium uptake is not taken into account. METHODS: 161 pediatric head, head & neck and chest CT examinations were retrospectively studied to identify those involving pre- and post-contrast imaging and thyroid inclusion in imaged volume. CT density of thyroid tissue in HU was measured in non-enhanced (NECT) and corresponding contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images. Resulting CT number increase (ΔHU) was recorded for each patient and corresponded to a % w/w iodine concentration. The relation of %w/w iodine concentration to %dose increase induced by iodinated contrast uptake was derived by Monte Carlo simulation experiments. RESULTS: The thyroid gland was visible in 11 chest and 3 neck CT examinations involving both pre- and post-contrast imaging. The %w/w concentration of iodine in the thyroid tissue at the time of CECT acquisition was found to be 0.13%-0.58% w/w (mean = 0.26%). The %increase of dose to thyroid tissue was found to be linearly correlated to%w/w iodine uptake. The increase in radiation dose to thyroid due to contrast uptake ranged from 12% to 44%, with a mean value of 23%. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose to the pediatric thyroid from CECT exposure may be underestimated by up to 44% if contrast medium uptake is not taken into account. Meticulous demarcation of imaged volume in pediatric chest CT examinations is imperative to avoid unnecessary direct exposure of thyroid, especially in CT examinations following intravenous administration of contrast medium.

The effect of iodine uptake on radiation dose absorbed by patient tissues in contrast enhanced CT imaging: Implications for CT dosimetry.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of iodine uptake on tissue/organ absorbed doses from CT exposure and its implications in CT dosimetry. METHODS: The contrast-induced CT number increase of several radiosensitive tissues was retrospectively determined in 120 CT examinations involving both non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced CT imaging. CT images of a phantom containing aqueous solutions of varying iodine concentration were obtained. Plots of the CT number increase against iodine concentration were produced. The clinically occurring iodine tissue uptake was quantified by attributing recorded CT number increase to a certain concentration of aqueous iodine solution. Clinically occurring iodine uptake was represented in mathematical anthropomorphic phantoms. Standard 120 kV CT exposures were simulated using Monte Carlo methods and resulting organ doses were derived for non-enhanced and iodine contrast-enhanced CT imaging. RESULTS: The mean iodine uptake range during contrast-enhanced CT imaging was found to be 0.02-0.46% w/w for the investigated tissues, while the maximum value recorded was 0.82% w/w. For the same CT exposure, iodinated tissues were found to receive higher radiation dose than non-iodinated tissues, with dose increase exceeding 100% for tissues with high iodine uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of iodinated contrast medium considerably increases radiation dose to tissues from CT exposure. KEY-POINTS: • Radiation absorption ability of organs/tissues is considerably affected by iodine uptake • Iodinated organ/tissues may absorb up to 100 % higher radiation dose • Compared to non-enhanced, contrast-enhanced CT may deliver higher dose to patient tissues • CT dosimetry of contrast-enhanced CT imaging should encounter tissue iodine uptake.