Predictors of relapse in a study of duloxetine treatment for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Data from a relapse prevention study of duloxetine treatment for adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were examined to identify predictors of relapse. METHODS: Patients responding to 6 months of open-label duloxetine treatment were randomized to continuation with duloxetine or withdrawal to placebo for a 6-month double-blind continuation phase (duloxetine, N= 216; placebo, N= 213). Post hoc analyses compared time to GAD relapse during continuation phase by using predictor variables that included patient demographics, symptom severity measures (Hamilton Anxiety Scale Scores [HAMA], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), functional outcomes, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain measures. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using predictor variables from time of randomization into the continuation, withdrawal phase. RESULTS: Severity of anxiety symptoms, degree of functional impairment, and severity of pain at time of randomization were significantly predictive of likelihood of relapse during the continuation phase. Multivariate backwards elimination analysis of significant univariate predictors identified HAMA item one (anxious mood) ≥ 1 and severity of pain while awake (≥ 30 on VAS) as the strongest predictors of GAD relapse. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with GAD responding to open-label treatment with duloxetine, residual symptoms related to anxious mood, pain severity, and psychosocial function were associated with increased relapse risk, although the greatest risk was associated with anxious mood and increased severity of pain while awake.

Efficacy of duloxetine on painful physical symptoms in major depressive disorder for patients with clinically significant painful physical symptoms at baseline: a meta-analysis of 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To review efficacy of duloxetine for physical symptoms and depressive illness in patients with at least mild to moderate major depressive disorder (MDD; DSM-IV) and clinically significant painful physical symptoms at baseline. DATA SOURCES: Global database of duloxetine clinical trials (Eli Lilly and Company). STUDY SELECTION: All 11 acute, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of duloxetine (7 with duloxetine 60-mg doses and 4 with non-60-mg doses) in the database that used a scale to measure painful physical symptoms and were completed before March 17, 2011. DATA EXTRACTION: For each study, patients with clinically significant pain levels at baseline (Visual Analog Scale overall pain rating ≥ 30, Numerical Rating Scale score ≥ 3, or Brief Pain Inventory 24-hour average pain rating ≥ 3) were selected in order to determine the effect sizes of duloxetine (compared with placebo for each trial) on the pain and depression measures. Overall effect sizes for both painful physical symptoms and MDD were obtained from the mean of individual-trial effect sizes, and each effect size was weighted relative to the number of patients within each study. DATA SYNTHESIS: The overall mean effect sizes were as follows: painful physical symptoms-60-mg trials, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.52); non-60-mg trials, 0.13 (95% CI, -0.19 to 0.45); MDD-60-mg trials, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.40); non-60-mg trials, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.32). Across the 11 studies, the weighted effect size for painful physical symptoms was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.51) and for MDD, 0.25 (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: According to this meta-analysis, duloxetine 60 mg once daily is as effective in improving painful physical symptoms as it is for depression in patients with MDD and clinically significant painful physical symptoms. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that duloxetine has small effect sizes in reducing painful physical symptoms and depressive symptoms in patients with MDD and clinically significant pain levels at baseline. Thus, the results of the study permit one to conclude that duloxetine has a clinically significant impact on painful physical symptoms and in reducing the severity of depressive symptoms. However, the results do not address its efficacy compared to other alternatives, as in all studies the comparator was placebo.

Assessing remission in major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder clinical trials with the discan metric of the Sheehan disability scale.

Relatively little research has focused on the relationship between functional remission and symptomatic remission in mood and anxiety disorders. This study investigates the relationship and synchrony between symptomatic and functional remission in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Using data from three MDD (N=1419) and four GAD (N=1847) randomized, placebo-controlled duloxetine studies, we calculated the percentages of patients meeting symptomatic, functional, and combined functional-symptomatic remission criteria for each disorder. We also calculated mean depression [17-item Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD17), Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale] scores and mean anxiety (Hamilton anxiety rating scale) scores for patients meeting Sheehan disability scale (SDS) functional remission and the mean SDS scores for patients with symptomatic remission. Among the patients with MDD, 38% achieved symptomatic remission (HAMD17 ≤ 7), 32% achieved functional remission (SDS ≤ 6), and 23% achieved combined functional-symptomatic remission. Mean HAMD17 and Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale scores for patients with functional remission were approximately 6. Mean SDS total scores for patients with symptomatic remission were 7.1 (patients with HAMD17 ≤ 7) and 8.6 (patients with Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale ≤ 10). Among the patients with GAD, 30% achieved symptomatic remission (Hamilton anxiety rating scale ≤ 7), 45% achieved functional remission (SDS ≤ 6), and 25% achieved combined symptomatic-functional remission. The mean Hamilton anxiety rating scale score in GAD was approximately 8 for patients with functional remission and the mean SDS total score was approximately 4 in patients with symptomatic remission. The study shows that functional remission does not always move in tandem with symptom remission and provides useful anchor points or rules of thumb for evaluating symptomatic and functional remission in MDD and GAD.

Sexual function during long-term duloxetine treatment in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction (SD) is frequently associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the untreated state and may be worsened by antidepressant treatment. AIM: We evaluated SD in duloxetine-treated patients during an MDD recurrence prevention study. METHOD: Patients (N = 514) received open-label duloxetine 60-120 mg/day for up to 34 weeks. Responders (N = 288) were randomly assigned to duloxetine or placebo during a further 52-week double-blind maintenance phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) was used to assess sexual functioning. RESULTS: At study entry, 73.4% of patients met ASEX criteria for SD. After open-label duloxetine treatment, the probability of continued SD was 77.9% for nonresponders and 53.2% for responders. In patients without SD at study entry, the probability of emergent SD was 49.6% (nonresponders) and 33.2% (responders). In the double-blind maintenance phase, there was no significant difference (P = 0.105) in the probability of emergent SD between placebo-treated (49.2%) and duloxetine-treated (27.9%) patients without SD at baseline, with no significant treatment-by-gender interaction. In patients with a recurrence of MDD, the probability of emergent SD was similar between placebo- (71.3%) and duloxetine-treated (82.7%) patients. However, in patients with no recurrence of MDD, the probability of emergent SD in placebo patients (40.0%) was numerically higher than in duloxetine patients (12.9%). Spontaneous reports of adverse events related to sexual function were infrequent and no patients discontinued due to these events. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MDD, the probability of continued or emergent SD after up to 34 weeks of open-label duloxetine treatment was associated with the response status of the patients. In patients who responded to duloxetine treatment, after up to a further 52 weeks of double-blind treatment either with duloxetine or placebo, the probability of continued or emergent SD appeared to be more related to MDD itself than the treatments that the patients received.

Relationship between TSH levels in the normal range and short-term duloxetine efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Whereas studies have suggested an association between abnormal TSH serum levels on antidepressant efficacy in major depressive disorder (MDD), the impact of normal serum TSH levels on antidepressant efficacy is unknown. This study aimed to investigate whether TSH serum levels within the normal range predict short-term antidepressant efficacy. METHODS: Pooled data from 7 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, MDD clinical trials were analyzed to compare the efficacy of duloxetine depending on baseline serum TSH levels. Adult outpatients with MDD (DSM-IV criteria) received duloxetine (60-120 mg/day, n=1242) or placebo (n=827) for up to 9 weeks. Efficacy was measured based on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score change, response rate, remission rate and time to response. TSH serum levels were measured at baseline using Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay technology. Only patients with a TSH serum level within the normal range were considered for the analysis. RESULTS: The mean (SD) of baseline TSH serum levels was 1.55 (0.86) mIU/L (median: 1.35; interquartile range: [0.92-1.94]). No significant treatment-by-TSH quartile interaction was evidenced in change from baseline, response, nor remission, indicating that the magnitude of duloxetine's treatment effects did not differ significantly between TSH quartiles. No significant difference in time to response was evidenced between any of the quartiles. LIMITATIONS: This analysis is a post-hoc analysis of pooled data. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of pooled data, the overall response to duloxetine in MDD did not differ regarding baseline serum TSH levels when considering TSH within the normal range.

The short- and long-term effect of duloxetine on painful physical symptoms in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: results from three clinical trials.

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is associated with painful physical symptoms (PPS). These post hoc analyses of previous trial data assessed PPS and their response to duloxetine treatment in GAD patients. Studies 1 and 2 (n=840) were 9- to 10-week efficacy trials; study 3 (n=887) was a relapse prevention trial comprising a 26-week open-label treatment phase and a 26-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment continuation phase. Mean baseline visual analog scale scores (VAS, 0-100; n=1727) ranged from 26 to 37 for overall pain, headache, back pain, shoulder pain, interference with daily activities, and time in pain while awake. In studies 1 and 2, improvement on all VAS scores was greater in duloxetine-treated than in placebo-treated patients (p

Duloxetine in the prevention of depressive recurrences: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of duloxetine 60-120 mg once daily in the prevention of depressive recurrence in outpatients with recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: Eligible patients with at least 3 episodes of MDD (DSM-IV diagnosis) in the past 5 years received open-label duloxetine 60-120 mg/day for up to 34 weeks. Patients meeting response criteria were then randomly assigned to either duloxetine or placebo for up to 52 weeks of double-blind maintenance treatment. The primary outcome measure was time to recurrence of a major depressive episode. Safety and tolerability were assessed via analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, weight, and laboratory measures. Patients were recruited from 43 study centers in 5 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Russia, and Sweden) and the United States. The study was conducted from March 2005 to January 2008. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were randomly assigned to duloxetine or placebo. Time to a depressive recurrence was significantly longer in duloxetine-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients (p < .001). During the double-blind maintenance phase, 33.1% of placebo-treated patients experienced a depressive recurrence compared with 14.4% of duloxetine-treated patients (p < .001). There were no significant differences between treatment groups in TEAEs, discontinuations due to adverse events, vital signs, or weight. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with duloxetine was associated with a longer time to depressive recurrence and a significantly lower recurrence rate compared with placebo. TRIALS REGISTRATION: (ClinicalTrials.gov) Identifier: NCT00105989.

Duloxetine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a relatively prevalent and disabling condition. Duloxetine, an inhibitor of both serotonin and norepinephrine, was approved by the US FDA in 2007 for the treatment of GAD. Short-term efficacy of duloxetine in dosages of 60-120 mg/day has been established in four double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of 9-10 weeks duration. Duloxetine has also been found to meet rigorous criteria for noninferiority in comparison with venlafaxine in GAD. Duloxetine has shown superiority on measures of functioning and quality of life and, compared with placebo treatment, it reduces painful physical symptoms common in GAD patients. Continuation treatment for acute treatment responders was found to prevent relapse of GAD to a significantly greater degree than placebo. In all acute and long-term trials, duloxetine was well-tolerated. This body of research suggests that duloxetine should be one of the options considered as a first-line treatment for GAD.

Bayesian adaptive non-inferiority with safety assessment: retrospective case study to highlight potential benefits and limitations of the approach.

Adaptive trial design applied to randomized clinical trials of psychiatric medicines offers the potential to make clinical trials more efficient. In the current analysis, we retrospectively applied Bayesian adaptive allocation methods to a case study in agitated patients with schizophrenia and related diseases. The original study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel design. The objective of this analysis was to demonstrate the potential benefits of Bayesian adaptive designs by shortening the study duration and therefore limiting patient exposure to ineffective placebo or an active comparator with a known side effect. Bayesian methods allowed us to fully leverage historical data along with data observed as the study was ongoing to calculate predictive probabilities of patient response to treatment without experiencing a specified side effect. Using the Bayesian adaptive approach would have required less than half the number of patients as the original study to draw the same conclusion. Sample size was reduced from 311 to 156 patients, thereby decreasing the number of patients exposed to placebo from 54 to 30 and the number exposed to the active control with a known side effect from 126 to 60.

Early improvement during duloxetine treatment of generalized anxiety disorder predicts response and remission at endpoint.

Because many patients do not respond to pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), it would be beneficial to know if early response is predictive of final outcome so that timely clinical decisions can be made about augmentation or alternative treatments. This topic has not been examined with the now recommended first-line treatments (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) for GAD. Combined data from three 9 to 10week acute treatment, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of duloxetine for GAD were used to explore early improvement on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) in relation to endpoint HAMA response (> or = 50% improvement from baseline), HAMA remission (< or = 7), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) response (< or = 2), and functional remission as measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale Global Functional Improvement (< or = 5). For duloxetine-treated patients (n=668), the relationships between the proportion of patients who achieved each category of early (week 2 and week 4) HAMA improvement (> or = 20%, > or = 40%, > or = 60%, and > or = 80%) and achievement of endpoint HAMA response, HAMA remission, CGI response, and SDS remission status were all statistically significant (all P's < or = 0.003). One hundred percent of the duloxetine-treated patients who showed substantial HAMA improvement (>80%) at week 2, and 93% at week 4, were HAMA responders at endpoint. At week 2, 79% of the duloxetine-treated patients who achieved a HAMA improvement of 40-59% were HAMA responders at endpoint. About half of duloxetine-treated patient showing 40-59% early HAMA improvement were remitters on the SDS at endpoint. These data suggest a connection between early improvement and endpoint response and remission status that can be used to guide clinical decision-making.

Examining quality of life in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: clinical relevance and response to duloxetine treatment.

BACKGROUND: Duloxetine, a serotonergic noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor, improved functional outcomes in each of three clinical studies for the treatment of adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Using comparison norms, the current work describes the clinical relevance of these functional improvements in terms of return to normative functioning and symptom remission. METHODS: Data were pooled at the individual patient level from three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of duloxetine treatment (9-10 weeks acute therapy, dose ranges 60-120mg). Inclusion/exclusion criteria were consistent across studies, and outcome measures included the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). RESULTS: Adult patients (mean age=42.4 years; 65% women) were randomly assigned to duloxetine (N=668) or placebo (N=495). At baseline, the majority of patients were impaired on the SDS global functioning (89%), Q-LES-Q-SF maximum percent (95%), and EQ-5D (76%) scores. On each measure, a greater percentage of duloxetine-treated patients converted from an impaired baseline to a normative endpoint score than did placebo-treated patients (p0.001, all comparisons). Remission defined as a HAMA total score at endpoint of 10, compared with 7, captured a greater proportion of patients who were functionally in remission. CONCLUSIONS: GAD is associated with substantial impairment in functioning and subjective well-being, and patients treated with duloxetine 60-120mg/day, compared with placebo, experienced a greater return to normative functioning. Attention to role functioning and quality of life may refine our definition of remission when using standard symptom measures of anxiety.