Importance of Adequate Surgical Local Control in Fusion-Negative Para-Testicular Rhabdomyosarcoma: Data From the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe Trials (CWS-96 and CWS-2002P) and the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Registry (SoTiSaR).

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact that the quality of primary and subsequent surgeries has on the survival of patients with para-testicular rhabdomyosarcoma (PTRMS). METHODS: Patients with localized (IRS I-III) and metastatic (IRS IV) PTRMS were enrolled in the two Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) trials (CWS-96, CWS-2002P) and the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Registry (SoTiSaR). RESULTS: Among 196 patients (median age, 8.4 years), 106 (54.1%) had primary complete resection. Image-defined lymph node (LN) disease was detected in 21 (11.5%) patients in the localized cohort and 12 (92.3%) patients in the metastatic cohort. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were respectively 87.3% and 94.0% for the patients with localized PTRMS and 46.2% and 42.2% for the patients with metastatic PTRMS. Protocol violations during the primary surgery (PV-PS) were observed in 70 (42%) of the IRS I-III patients. This resulted in higher rates of R1/R2 resections (n = 53 [76%] vs n = 20 [21%]; p < 0.001) with a need for pretreatment re-excision (PRE) (n = 50 [83%] vs n = 10 [17%]; p < 0.001) compared with the patients undergoing correct primary surgery. Protocol violations during PRE occurred for 13 (20%) patients. Although PV-PS did not influence the 5-year EFS or OS in the localized PTRMS cohort, the unadjusted log-rank test showed that R status after PRE is a prognostic factor for 5-year OS (R1 vs R0 [81.8% vs 97.6%]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of surgical local control in PTRMS is unsatisfactory. Emphasis should be placed on evaluating the resection status after PRE in further clinical trials.

Current Management of Desmoid Tumors: A Review.

Importance: Desmoid tumor (DT) is a rare and locally aggressive monoclonal, fibroblastic proliferation characterized by a variable and often unpredictable clinical course. Previously, surgery was the standard primary treatment modality; however, within the past decade, a paradigm shift toward less-invasive management has been introduced and an effort to harmonize the strategy among clinicians has been made. To update the 2020 global evidence-based consensus guideline on the management of patients with DT, the Desmoid Tumor Working Group convened a 1-day consensus meeting in Milan, Italy, on June 30, 2023, under the auspices of the European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers and Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network, the Desmoid Foundation Italy, and the Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation. The meeting brought together over 90 adult and pediatric sarcoma experts from different disciplines as well as patients and patient advocates from around the world. Observations: The 2023 update of the global evidence-based consensus guideline focused on the positioning of local therapies alongside surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment algorithm as well as the positioning of the newest class of medical agents, such as γ-secretase inhibitors. Literature searches of MEDLINE and Embase databases were performed for English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies to obtain data to support the consensus recommendations. Of the 18 full-text articles retrieved, only 4 articles met the inclusion criteria. The 2023 consensus guideline is informed by a number of new aspects, including data for local ablative therapies such as cryotherapy; other indications for surgery; and the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat, the first representative of the newest class of medical agents and first approved drug for DT. Management of DT is complex and should be carried out exclusively in designated DT referral centers equipped with a multidisciplinary tumor board. Selection of the appropriate strategy should consider DT-related symptoms, associated risks, tumor location, disease morbidities, available treatment options, and preferences of individual patients. Conclusions and Relevance: The therapeutic armamentarium of DT therapy is continually expanding. It is imperative to carefully select the management strategy for each patient with DT to optimize tumor control and enhance quality of life.

Diagnostic evaluation of paediatric autoimmune lymphoproliferative immunodeficiencies (ALPID): a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoproliferation and autoimmune cytopenias characterise autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Other conditions sharing these manifestations have been termed autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-like diseases, although they are frequently more severe. The aim of this study was to define the genetic, clinical, and immunological features of these disorders to improve their diagnostic classification. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, patients were referred to the Center for Chronic Immunodeficiency in Freiburg, Germany, between Jan 1, 2008 and March 5, 2022. We enrolled patients younger than 18 years with lymphoproliferation and autoimmune cytopenia, lymphoproliferation and at least one additional sign of an inborn error of immunity (SoIEI), bilineage autoimmune cytopenia, or autoimmune cytopenia and at least one additional SoIEI. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome biomarkers were determined in all patients. Sanger sequencing followed by in-depth genetic studies were recommended for patients with biomarkers indicative of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, while IEI panels, exome sequencing, or genome sequencing were recommended for patients without such biomarkers. Genetic analyses were done as decided by the treating physician. The study was registered on the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00011383, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: We recruited 431 children referred for autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome evaluation, of whom 236 (55%) were included on the basis of lymphoproliferation and autoimmune cytopenia, 148 (34%) on the basis of lymphoproliferation and another SoIEI, 33 (8%) on the basis of autoimmune bicytopenia, and 14 (3%) on the basis of autoimmune cytopenia and another SoIEI. Median age at diagnostic evaluation was 9·8 years (IQR 5·5-13·8), and the cohort comprised 279 (65%) boys and 152 (35%) girls. After biomarker and genetic assessments, autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome was diagnosed in 71 (16%) patients. Among the remaining 360 patients, 54 (15%) had mostly autosomal-dominant autoimmune lymphoproliferative immunodeficiencies (AD-ALPID), most commonly affecting JAK-STAT (26 patients), CTLA4-LRBA (14), PI3K (six), RAS (five), or NFκB (three) signalling. 19 (5%) patients had other IEIs, 17 (5%) had non-IEI diagnoses, 79 (22%) were unresolved despite extended genetics (ALPID-U), and 191 (53%) had insufficient genetic workup for diagnosis. 16 (10%) of 161 patients with a final diagnosis had somatic mutations. Alternative classification of patients fulfilling common variable immunodeficiency or Evans syndrome criteria did not increase the proportion of genetic diagnoses. INTERPRETATION: The ALPID phenotype defined in this study is enriched for patients with genetic diseases treatable with targeted therapies. The term ALPID might be useful to focus diagnostic and therapeutic efforts by triggering extended genetic analysis and consideration of targeted therapies, including in some children currently classified as having common variable immunodeficiency or Evans syndrome. FUNDING: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under Germany's Excellence Strategy. TRANSLATION: For the German translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor With ROS1 Gene Fusions in Children and Young Adolescents.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are often driven by anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusions and less frequently by alternative fusions such as ROS1. We describe the clinical characteristics, treatment approach, and outcome for a series of young patients with IMTs and ROS1 alterations. METHODS: This was a retrospective, international, multicenter study analyzing young patients (younger than 21 years) with ROS1-altered IMTs treated in 10 European referral centers between 2014 and 2022. Patients were included in the European pediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group NRSTS-2005 protocol or registered in the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Registry. Primary surgery was recommended if a microscopic radical resection was feasible without mutilation. No standard systemic treatment protocol was available, but several medical options were recommended. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (median age 8.3 years) were included. Most patients had a biopsy at diagnosis (Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study [IRS] I; n = 2, IRS II; n = 1, IRS III biopsy; n = 11, IRS III resection; n = 3, IRS IV; n = 2). Twelve patients received neoadjuvant systemic therapy in first line (four received multiple treatments): high-dose steroids (n = 2), vinorelbine/vinblastine with methotrexate (n = 6), or ROS1 inhibitors (n = 8). After a median follow-up of 2.8 years (range, 0.2-13.4), seven patients developed an event. The 3-year event-free survival was 41% (95% CI, 11 to 71), and the 3-year overall survival was 100%. CONCLUSION: Outcome for ROS1-altered IMTs appears excellent. A complete resection at diagnosis was often not feasible, and most patients needed neoadjuvant therapy. Patients who developed a tumor event could be cured with reinitiation of systemic therapy and/or surgery. This approach illustrates a switch in treatment philosophy moving from immediate, often mutilating, surgery to systemic (targeted) therapy as a bridge to more conservative surgery later in the treatment course.

Which Patients With Rhabdomyosarcoma Need Radiotherapy? Analysis of the Radiotherapy Strategies of the CWS-96 and CWS-2002P Studies and SoTiSaR Registry.

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the indications, doses, and application methods of radiotherapy (RT) and their influence on prognosis of patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: One thousand four hundred seventy patients with localized RMS 21 years and younger entered on CWS-96, CWS-2002P, and SoTiSaR were eligible for the analysis. The median follow-up was 6.5 years (IQR, 3.3-9.5). RESULTS: The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and local control survival (LCS) for 910 (62%) irradiated versus nonirradiated patients were 71% versus 69% and 78% versus 73% (P = .03), respectively. Ninety-five percent of patients in IRS I (90% embryonal RMS [eRMS]) were nonirradiated (EFS, 87%). Irradiated patients with IRS II had improved LCS (91% v 80%; P = .01) and EFS (not significant). In IRS III, EFS and LCS were significantly better for RT patients: 71% versus 56% (P = 3.1e-06) and 76% versus 61% (P = 4.1e-07). Patients with tumors in the head and neck region (orbita, parameningeal, and nonparameningeal) and in other sites had significantly better EFS and LCS and in parameningeal also overall survival (OS). The efficacy of low RT doses of 32 Gy (hyperfractionated, accelerated RT [HART]) and 36 and 41.4 Gy (conventional fractionated RT [CFRT]) in the favorable groups and higher doses of 44.8 Gy (HART) and 50.4 and 55.4 Gy (CFRT) in the unfavorable groups was comparable. Proton RT was used predominantly in head/neck-parameningeal (HN-PM) tumors, with similar EFS and LCS to photon RT. CONCLUSION: RT can be omitted in patients with IRS I eRMS. RT improves LCS and EFS in IRS II and III. RT improves OS in patients with HN-PM, with proton RT comparable with photon RT. Doses of 32 Gy (HART) or 36 and 41.4 Gy (CFRT) had comparable efficacy in patients with favorable risk profiles and 44.8 Gy (HART) or 50.4 and 55.8 Gy (CFRT) in the unfavorable groups.

INternational Soft Tissue saRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT) consensus statement: Imaging recommendations for the management of rhabdomyosarcoma.

Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft-tissue neoplasm in the pediatric population. The survival of children with rhabdomyosarcoma has only marginally improved over the past 25 years and remains poor for those with metastatic disease. A significant challenge to advances in treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma is the relative rarity of this disease, necessitating years to complete clinical trials. Progress can be accelerated by international cooperation and sharing national experiences. This necessitates agreement on a common language to describe patient cohorts and consensus standards to guide diagnosis, treatment, and response assessment. These goals formed the premise for creating the INternational Soft Tissue saRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT) in 2017. Multidisciplinary members of this consortium have since developed international consensus statements on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pediatric soft-tissue sarcomas. Herein, members of the INSTRuCT Diagnostic Imaging Working Group present international consensus recommendations for imaging of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma at diagnosis, at staging, and during and after completion of therapy. The intent is to promote a standardized imaging approach to pediatric patients with this malignancy to create more-reliable comparisons of results of clinical trials internationally, thereby accelerating progress in managing rhabdomyosarcoma and improving survival.

Optimizing expert and patient input in pediatric trial design: Lessons learned and recommendations from a collaboration between conect4children and European Patient-CEntric ClinicAl TRial PLatforms.

Advice from multiple stakeholders is required to design the optimal pediatric clinical trial. We present recommendations for acquiring advice from trial experts and patients/caregivers, derived from advice meetings that were performed through a collaboration of the Collaborative Network for European Clinical Trials for Children (c4c) and the European Patient-CEntric ClinicAl TRial PLatforms (EU-PEARL). Three advice meetings were performed: (1) an advice meeting for clinical and methodology experts, (2) an advice meeting for patients/caregivers, and (3) a combined meeting with both experts and patients/caregivers. Trial experts were recruited from c4c database. Patients/caregivers were recruited through a patient organization. Participants were asked to provide input on a trial protocol, including endpoints, outcomes, and the assessment schedule. Ten experts, 10 patients, and 13 caregivers participated. The advice meetings resulted in modification of eligibility criteria and outcome measures. We have provided recommendations for the most effective meeting type per protocol topic. Topics with limited options for patient input were most efficiently discussed in expert advice meetings. Other topics benefit from patient/caregiver input, either through a combined meeting with experts or a patients/caregivers-only advice meeting. Some topics, such as endpoints and outcome measures, are suitable for all meeting types. Combined sessions profit from synergy between experts and patients/caregivers, balancing input on protocol scientific feasibility and acceptability. Both experts and patients/caregivers provided critical input on the presented protocol. The combined meeting was the most effective methodology for most protocol topics. The presented methodology can be used effectively to acquire expert and patient feedback.

Larotrectinib versus historical standard of care in patients with infantile fibrosarcoma: protocol of EPI-VITRAKVI.

The EPI VITRAKVI study is a retrospective study designed to place the results of the single-arm Phase I/II larotrectinib SCOUT trial into context by comparison with external historical controls. Its primary objective is to compare the time to medical treatment failure between larotrectinib and the historical standard of care (chemotherapy) in patients with infantile fibrosarcoma. External historical cohorts have been selected by using objective criteria. The Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting method will be used to adjust for potential confounding. The current publication illustrates how an external control arm study can complement data from a single-arm trial and addresses uncertainties encountered in the assessment of therapies targeting rare abnormalities where randomized controlled trials are considered not feasible. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05236257 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) is a rare type of childhood cancer that commonly affects the legs and arms. In IFS cancers, the units which carry the information that determines your traits (genes), typically have specific changes which leads to the creation of an altered fusion protein, a protein which is created by joining parts of two different genes. This altered fusion protein can cause cancer cells to survive and to grow. Larotrectinib works by blocking the altered fusion protein and is already available in Europe and in many other countries. It is approved for prescription to patients with the altered fusion protein, whose cancer has spread to nearby tissues and/or lymph nodes or to other parts of the body. Since IFSs a rare disease, previous studies did not compare larotrectinib with the standard of care, which is chemotherapy. The main purpose of our study is to collect more results on how well larotrectinib works compared with chemotherapy taken from real world evidence data. The present publication explains how such a comparison can be made and how such a study can help in the assessment of treatments that target rare diseases.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes for children, adolescents and young adults with "CIC-fused" or "BCOR-rearranged" soft tissue sarcomas: A multi-institutional European retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: In certain rare undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas new specific molecular CIC-DUX4/other partner, BCOR-CCNB3/other partner, YWHAE fusions, or BCOR-ITD (internal tandem duplication) were identified. These new "CIC fused" (CIC-fused/ATXN1::NUTM1) and "BCOR rearranged" (BCOR fused/ITD/ YWHAE) soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are not well described. METHODS: Multi-institutional European retrospective analysis of young patients (0-24 years) with CIC-fused and BCOR rearranged STS. RESULTS: Overall, out of the 60 patients selected, the fusion status was CIC-fused (n = 29), ATXN1::NUTM1 (n = 2), BCOR::CCNB3 (n = 18), BCOR-ITD (n = 7), and YWHAE (n = 3), MAML::BCOR STS (n = 1). The main primaries were abdomen-pelvic (n = 23) and limbs (n = 18). Median age was 14 years (0.9-23.8) and 0.9 (0.1-19.1) for CIC-fused and BCOR-rearranged groups, respectively (n = 29; p < 0.001). IRS stages were I (n = 3), II (n = 7), III (n = 35), and IV (n = 15). Overall, 42 patients had large tumors (>5 cm) but only six had lymph node involvement. Patients received mainly chemotherapy (n = 57), local surgery (n = 50), and/or radiotherapy (n = 34). After a median follow-up of 47.1 months (range, 3.4-230), 33 (52%) patients had an event and 23 patients died. Three-year event-free survivals were 44.0% (95% CI 28.7-67.5) and 41.2% (95% CI 25.4-67.0) for CIC and BCOR groups (p = 0.97), respectively. Three-year overall survivals were 46.3% (95% CI 29.6-72.4) and 67.1% (95% CI 50.4-89.3; p = 0.24), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients often present with large tumors and metastatic disease, especially CIC sarcomas. Overall outcome is dismal. New treatment options are needed.

Second-line treatment of pediatric patients with relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma adapted to initial risk stratification: Data of the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Registry (SoTiSaR).

BACKGROUND: Outcome of relapsed disease of localized rhabdomyosarcoma remains poor. An individual treatment approach considering the initial systemic treatment and risk group was included in the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) Guidance. METHODS: Second-line chemotherapy (sCHT) ACCTTIVE based on anthracyclines (adriamycin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, topotecan, vincristine, etoposide) was recommended for patients with initial low- (LR), standard- (SR), and high-risk (HR) group after initial treatment without anthracyclines. TECC (topotecan, etoposide, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide) was recommended after initial anthracycline-based regimen in the very high-risk (VHR) group. Data of patients with relapse (n = 68) registered in the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Registry SoTiSaR (2009-2018) were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Patients of initial LR (n = 2), SR (n = 16), HR (n = 41), and VHR (n = 9) group relapsed. sCHT consisted of ACCTTIVE (n = 36), TECC (n = 12), or other (n = 15). Resection was performed in 40/68 (59%) patients and/or radiotherapy in 47/68 (69%). Initial risk stratification, pattern/time to relapse, and achievement of second complete remission were significant prognostic factors. Microscopically incomplete resection with additional radiotherapy was not inferior to microscopically complete resection (p = .17). The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 26% (±12%) and 31% (±14%). The 5-year OS of patients with relapse of SR, HR, and VHR groups was 80% (±21%), 20% (±16%), and 13% (±23%, p = .008), respectively. CONCLUSION: Adapted systemic treatment of relapsed disease considering the initial risk group and initial treatment is reasonable. New treatment options are needed for patients of initial HR and VHR groups.

Pediatric Patients with Stage IV Rhabdomyosarcoma Significantly Benefit from Long-Term Maintenance Therapy: Results of the CWS-IV 2002 and the CWS DOK IV 2004-Trials.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in childhood. Whereas more than 90% of patients with localized low-risk RMS can be cured, metastatic RMS have a dismal outcome, with survival rates of less than 30%. The HD CWS-96 trial showed an improved outcome for patients receiving maintenance therapy after completing intensive chemotherapy. Consequently, the international clinical trials CWS-IV 2002 and CWS DOK IV 2004 on metastatic disease of STS of the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) were designed in addition to the CWS-2002P trial for localized RMS disease. All patients received a multimodal intensive treatment regimen. To maintain remission, three options were compared: long-term maintenance therapy (LTMT) versus allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) versus high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). A total of 176 pediatric patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic RMS or RMS-like tumor were included. A total of 89 patients receiving LTML showed a significantly better outcome, with an event-free survival (EFS) of 41% and an overall survival (OS) of 53%, than alloHSCT (n = 21, EFS 19%, p = 0.02, OS 24%, p = 0.002). The outcome of LTML was slightly improved compared to HDCT (n = 13, EFS 35%, OS 34%). In conclusion, our data suggest that in patients suffering from metastatic RMS, long-term maintenance therapy is a superior strategy in terms of EFS and OS compared to alloHSCT. EFS and OS of HDCT are similar in these strategies; however, the therapeutic burden of LTMT is much lower.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as individual treatment option in pediatric patients with very high-risk sarcomas.

Background: Prognosis of children with primary disseminated or metastatic relapsed sarcomas remains dismal despite intensification of conventional therapies including high-dose chemotherapy. Since haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is effective in the treatment of hematological malignancies by mediating a graft versus leukemia effect, we evaluated this approach in pediatric sarcomas as well. Methods: Patients with bone Ewing sarcoma or soft tissue sarcoma who received haplo-HSCT as part of clinical trials using CD3+ or TCRα/ß+ and CD19+ depletion respectively were evaluated regarding feasibility of treatment and survival. Results: We identified 15 patients with primary disseminated disease and 14 with metastatic relapse who were transplanted from a haploidentical donor to improve prognosis. Three-year event-free survival (EFS) was 18,1% and predominantly determined by disease relapse. Survival depended on response to pre-transplant therapy (3y-EFS of patients in complete or very good partial response: 36,4%). However, no patient with metastatic relapse could be rescued. Conclusion: Haplo-HSCT for consolidation after conventional therapy seems to be of interest for some, but not for the majority of patients with high-risk pediatric sarcomas. Evaluation of its future use as basis for subsequent humoral or cellular immunotherapies is necessary.

The significance of margins in pediatric Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: Consensus on surgical margin definition harmonization from the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT).

BACKGROUND: Margin status following surgery in children, adolescents, and young adults with soft tissue sarcomas is controversial and has been defined differently by various specialties, with definitions changing over time and by cooperative group. The International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT) is a collaboration of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee, European pediatric Soft Tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the European Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) devoted to improving patient outcomes by pooling and mining cooperative group clinical trial data. METHODS: The INSTRuCT non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) working group aimed to develop international harmonized recommendations regarding surgical margin assessment and definitions in children and adolescents with soft tissue tumors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This review addresses accepted principles and areas of controversy, including the perspectives of surgeons, pathologists, radiation oncologists, and pediatric oncologists, to develop a framework for building common guidelines for future research.

Local treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma of the female genital tract: Expert consensus from the Children's Oncology Group, the European Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Group, and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe.

The International Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT) was founded as an international collaboration between different pediatric soft-tissue sarcoma cooperative groups (Children's Oncology Group, European Pediatric Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Group, and Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe). Besides other tasks, a major goal of INSTRuCT is to develop consensus expert opinions for best clinical treatment. This consensus paper for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma of the female genital tract (FGU-RMS) provides treatment recommendations for local treatment, long-term follow-up, and fertility preservation. Therefore, a review of the current literature was combined with recommendations of the treatment protocols of the appropriate clinical trials. Additionally, opinions of international FGU-RMS experts were incorporated into recommendations. Results were that the prognosis of FGU-RMS is favorable with an excellent response to chemotherapy. Initial complete surgical resection is not indicated, but diagnosis should be established properly. In patients with tumors localized at the vagina or cervix demonstrating incomplete response after induction chemotherapy, local radiotherapy (brachytherapy) should be carried out. In patients with persistent tumors at the corpus uteri, hysterectomy should be performed. Fertility preservation should be considered in all patients. In conclusion, for the first time, an international consensus for the treatment of FGU-RMS patients could be achieved, which will help to harmonize the treatment of these patients in different study groups.

Evaluation of functional and metabolic tumor volume using voxel-wise analysis in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional imaging-based morphological characteristics of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma have failed to predict outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and possible value of generating tumor sub-volumes using voxel-wise analysis of metabolic and functional data from positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) or PET/computed tomography (CT) and MRI in rhabdomyosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four examinations in 17 patients who received PET/MRI or PET/CT plus MRI were analyzed. The volume of interest included total tumor volume before and after therapy. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and standard uptake values (SUV) were determined voxel-wise. Voxels were assigned to three different groups based on ADC and SUV: "viable tumor tissue," "intermediate tissue" or "possible necrosis." In a second approach, data were grouped into three clusters using the Gaussian mixture model. The ratio of these clusters to total tumor volume and changes due to chemotherapy were correlated with clinical and histopathological data. RESULTS: After chemotherapy, the proportion of voxels in the different groups changed significantly. A significant reduction of the proportion of voxels assigned to cluster 1 was found, from a mean of 36.4% to 2.5% (P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the proportion of voxels in cluster 3 following chemotherapy from 24.8% to 81.6% (P = 0.02). The proportion of voxels in cluster 2 differed depending on the presence or absence of tumor recurrence, falling from 48% to 10% post-chemotherapy in the group with no tumor recurrence (P < 0.05) and from 29% to 23% (P > 0.05) in the group with tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: Voxel-wise evaluation of multimodal data in rhabdomyosarcoma is feasible. Our initial results suggest that the different distribution of sub-volumes before and after therapy may have prognostic significance.

Drug sensitivity profiling of 3D tumor tissue cultures in the pediatric precision oncology program INFORM.

The international precision oncology program INFORM enrolls relapsed/refractory pediatric cancer patients for comprehensive molecular analysis. We report a two-year pilot study implementing ex vivo drug sensitivity profiling (DSP) using a library of 75-78 clinically relevant drugs. We included 132 viable tumor samples from 35 pediatric oncology centers in seven countries. DSP was conducted on multicellular fresh tumor tissue spheroid cultures in 384-well plates with an overall mean processing time of three weeks. In 89 cases (67%), sufficient viable tissue was received; 69 (78%) passed internal quality controls. The DSP results matched the identified molecular targets, including BRAF, ALK, MET, and TP53 status. Drug vulnerabilities were identified in 80% of cases lacking actionable (very) high-evidence molecular events, adding value to the molecular data. Striking parallels between clinical courses and the DSP results were observed in selected patients. Overall, DSP in clinical real-time is feasible in international multicenter precision oncology programs.

Patients with completely resected nongenitourinary low-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma are candidates for reduced duration low-intensity chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The survival of patients with localized embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) completely resected at diagnosis is greater than 90%. Most patients have paratesticular, uterine, or vaginal RMS, limiting specific analyses of RMS localized in other anatomic regions. This international study was conducted to define the outcome for completely resected embryonal RMS at sites other than paratesticular, uterine, or vaginal primary sites. METHODS: A total of 113 patients aged 0-18 years were identified who were enrolled from January 1995 to December 2016 in Children's Oncology Group (COG) (64 patients) and European protocols (49). Genitourinary nonbladder and prostate RMS were excluded. The recommended chemotherapy was vincristine and actinomycin-D (VA) for 24 weeks or ifosfamide plus VA in the European protocols and VA for 48 weeks or VA plus cyclophosphamide in the COG protocols. RESULTS: The most common primary sites were nonparameningeal head and neck (40.7%), other (23.9%), and extremities (20.4%). In the COG studies, 42% of patients received VA and 58% VA plus cyclophosphamide. In Europe, 53% received VA and 47% ifosfamide plus VA. With a median follow-up of 97.5 months, the 5-year progression-free and overall survival was 80.0% (71.2%-86.4%) and 92.5% (85.6%-96.2%), respectively, without significant differences between chemotherapy regimens. Tumor size (< or >5 cm) significantly influenced overall survival: 96.2% (88.6%-98.8%) vs. 80.6% (59.5%-91.4%), respectively (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with nonalveolar RMS completely resected at diagnosis is excellent among tumors arising from nonparatesticular, uterine, and vaginal sites, and patients may be treated successfully with low-intensity chemotherapy. To reduce the burden of treatment, VA for 24 weeks may be considered in children with tumors <5 cm.

Creating a data commons: The INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT).

In this article, we will discuss the genesis, evolution, and progress of the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT), which aims to foster international research and collaboration focused on pediatric soft tissue sarcoma. We will begin by highlighting the current state of clinical research for pediatric soft tissue sarcomas, including rhabdomyosarcoma and non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma. We will then explore challenges and research priorities, describe the development of INSTRuCT, and discuss how the consortium aims to address key research priorities.