Corticotropin releasing factor-1 receptor antagonist, CP-154,526, blocks the expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization in DBA/2J mice.

RATIONALE: Manipulation of glucocorticoid receptor signaling has been shown to alter the acquisition and expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in mice. It is unknown if other components of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis modulate locomotor sensitization resulting from repeated ethanol administration. In the present investigation, we determined if pretreatment with an i.p. injection of CP-154,526, a selective corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) type-1 receptor antagonist, would block the acquisition and/or expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in male DBA/2J mice. METHODS: To assess the role of the CRF1 receptor in the acquisition of behavioral sensitization, mice were pretreated with an i.p. injection of CP-154,526 30 min before each of 10 sensitizing i.p. injections of ethanol. To determine the role of the CRF1 receptor in modulating the expression of ethanol-induced sensitization, mice that had previously been sensitized to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol were pretreated with CP-154,526 30 min before an i.p. injection of ethanol on the test day. In a third study, ethanol-naïve mice were pretreated with CP-154,526 30 min before an initial i.p. injection of ethanol to determine the combined effects of the CRF1 receptor antagonist and ethanol on locomotor activity. Blood ethanol concentrations were assessed at the termination of sensitization studies. RESULTS: Pretreatment with CP-154,526 blocked the expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in DBA/2J mice but did not prevent the acquisition of sensitization. The ability of CP-154,526 to block the expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization was not attributable to alterations in blood ethanol levels or possible sedative effects produced by the combined administration of CP-154,526 and ethanol. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide novel evidence that CRF1 receptor signaling modulates the expression of ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization, and add to a growing literature suggesting a role for neurochemicals and hormones associated with the HPA-axis in behavioral sensitization resulting from repeated exposure to drugs of abuse.

Involvement of protein kinase A in ethanol-induced locomotor activity and sensitization.

RATIONALE: Mutant mice lacking the RIIbeta subunit of protein kinase A (regulatory subunit II beta(-/-)) show increased ethanol preference. Recent evidence suggests a relationship between heightened ethanol preference and susceptibility to ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization. It is currently unknown if protein kinase A signaling modulates the stimulant effects and/or behavioral sensitization caused by ethanol administration. To address this question, we examined the effects of repeated ethanol administration on locomotor activity RIIbeta(-/-) and littermate wild-type (RIIbeta(+/+)) mice on multiple genetic backgrounds. METHODS: Over three consecutive days, mice were given single i.p. saline injections and immediately placed in a locomotor activity apparatus to establish a composite baseline for locomotor activity. Next, mice maintained on a hybrid 129/SvEvxC57BL/6J or pure C57BL/6J genetic background were given 10 i.p. ethanol injections before being placed in the activity apparatus. Each ethanol injection was separated by 3-4 days. To determine if changes in behavior were specific to ethanol injection, naïve mice were tested following repeated daily saline injections. The effects of ethanol injection on locomotor behavior were also assessed using an alternate paradigm in which mice were given repeated ethanol injections in their home cage environment. RESULTS: Relative to RIIbeta(+/+) mice, RIIbeta(-/-) mice, regardless of genetic background, consistently showed significantly greater ethanol-induced locomotor activation. RIIbeta(-/-) mice also showed increased sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization resulting from repeated administration, an effect that was dependent on genetic background and testing paradigm. Increased locomotor activity by RIIbeta(-/-) mice was specific to ethanol injections, and was not related to altered blood ethanol levels. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide novel evidence implicating an influence of protein kinase A signaling on ethanol-induced locomotor activity and behavioral sensitization. The observation that RIIbeta(-/-) mice are more sensitive to the effects of repeated ethanol administration suggests that normal protein kinase A signaling limits, or is protective against, the stimulant effects of ethanol and the plastic alterations that underlie behavioral sensitization.