Performance evaluation of four 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays to measure 25-hydroxyvitamin D2.

OBJECTIVES: The ability of current immunoassays to accurately measure equimolar amounts of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 has been recently questioned. This study determined serum 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3 and total serum 25(OH)D concentrations in healthy vitamin D2-supplemented subjects by isotope dilution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS); and, evaluated the ability of the Siemens, DiaSorin, Roche, and Abbott Vitamin D Total assays to monitor total serum 25(OH)D concentrations compared to an ID-LC-MS/MS method traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and that has achieved certification from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Vitamin D Standardization Certification Program (VDSCP). DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty (20) healthy adults, with no history of prior vitamin D supplementation were administered oral vitamin D2 (2400IU/day for 6months). Serum samples (140) from baseline and monthly blood draws were tested. RESULTS: After one month, the mean serum 25(OH)D2 concentrations rose from 0.8 to 43.6nmol/L, whereas 25(OH)D3 concentrations declined from 84.0 to 63.4nmol/L; total serum 25(OH)D concentrations rose from 86.6 to 107.0nmol/L. The overall mean bias to ID-LC-MS/MS was -7.1% for the Siemens ADVIA Centaur assay, -15.3% for the DiaSorin LIAISON assay; -8.4% for the Roche ELECSYS assay and -16.3% for the Abbott ARCHITECT assay. Correlation coefficients (r) were 0.94, 0.79, 0.74, and 0.73; the mean bias for baseline [25(OH) D3-containing] versus six-month [25(OH)D2- and 25(OH)D3-containing] samples was -13.4% and -5.7%; -3.5% and 20.3%, 9.6% and -12.1%, and 0.2% and -17.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The bias results obtained for the Siemens ADVIA Centaur assay and Roche ELECSYS assay were slightly lower than those for the DiaSorin LIAISON assay and the Abbott ARCHITECT assay, but all 25(OH)D assays demonstrated acceptable performance.

Erratum to "Influence of Vitamin D Binding Protein on Accuracy of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Measurement Using the ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total Assay".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2014/691679.].

Influence of Vitamin D Binding Protein on Accuracy of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Measurement Using the ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total Assay.

Vitamin D status in different populations relies on accurate measurement of total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations [i.e., 25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D2]. This study evaluated agreement between the ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total assay for 25(OH)D testing (traceable to the NIST-Ghent reference method procedure) and a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for various populations with different levels of vitamin D binding protein (DBP). Total serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured for 36 pregnant women, 40 hemodialysis patients, and 30 samples (DBP-spiked or not) from healthy subjects. ELISA measured DBP levels. The mean serum DBP concentrations were higher for pregnancy (415 µg/mL) and lower for hemodialysis subjects (198 µg/mL) than for healthy subjects and were highest for spiked serum (545 µg/mL). The average bias between the ADVIA Centaur assay and the LC-MS/MS method was -1.4% (healthy), -6.1% (pregnancy), and 4.4% (hemodialysis). The slightly greater bias for samples from some pregnancy and hemodialysis subjects with serum DBP levels outside of the normal healthy range fell within a clinically acceptable range-reflected by analysis of their low-range (≤136 µg/mL), medium-range (137-559 µg/mL), and high-range (≥560 µg/mL) DBP groups. Thus, the ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total assay demonstrates acceptable performance compared with an LC-MS/MS method for populations containing different amounts of DBP.