Dopaminergic treatment of acromegaly: different effects on hormone secretion and tumor size.

We studied the effects of long term treatment with bromocriptine (Br) or lisuride (L) on GH secretion and tumor size in 19 acromegalic patients with large pituitary adenomas. In 22 additional patients with smaller adenomas, only plasma GH levels were monitored during treatment. All patients underwent an acute test with 2.5 mg Br or 0.3 mg L and, on the basis of GH changes, were classified as responders, i.e. reduction in circulating GH concentrations by at least 50% below baseline, or as nonresponders. The chronic treatment was 5-20 mg/day Br in 26 patients or 0.3-2.0 mg/day L in 15 patients. Treatment was given for 4-26 months (mean +/- SE, 13.3 +/- 2.8 months). Plasma GH levels (baseline, 46.3 +/- 8.3 ng/ml) were significantly lower in the group as a whole (22.7 +/- 3.6 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) after the first month of treatment with dopamine agonist agents. GH levels decreased significantly in those acromegalic patients who responded to the acute test (P less than 0.001), but were unchanged in the nonresponders. In addition, there was a significant correlation between the maximal percent GH decrease in the acute test and the response during chronic treatment (r = 0.73; P less than 0.01). Computed tomography failed to show any tumor size changes in any of the GH nonresponders who had a macroadenoma . However, in two patients in the acute responder group with macroadenomas, chronic dopamine agonist therapy resulted in reduction of the extrasellar portion of the tumor (-30% and -40% of tumor area, respectively). These data show that although dopaminergic drugs lower GH levels and reverse signs and symptoms of active disease in those acromegalic patients who are responsive to an acute challenge, tumor size reduction occurred in a minority of such patients.

Reenlargement of macroprolactinomas during bromocriptine treatment: report of two cases.

We report two cases with macroprolactinoma who during medical treatment with bromocriptine showed a normalization of PRL levels and a reduction of tumor size as documented by computed tomography. After a few months of therapy both patients suddenly complained of worsening of their visual fields and a computed tomography demonstrated a reenlargement of the tumor mass; whereas in one patient PRL levels remained always within normal range, in the other patient, who was taking spiramycin for an intercurrent illness, there was also an escape of the hormonal secretion from the inhibitory effect of bromocriptine. The first patient underwent surgery, whereas in the second patient continuation of bromocriptine and interruption of antibiotic treatment resulted in progressive improvement in visual fields and a reduction of tumor size again. We want to stress that in patients with macroprolactinomas responsive to the medical treatment both in terms of PRL secretion and of tumor size reduction, an escape from the effects of bromocriptine, although infrequently, may occur.

Effects of nomifensine on growth hormone and prolactin secretion in normal subjects and in pathological hyperprolactinemia.

We have studied the effect of the oral administration of 200 mg nomifensine (nom), a drug which activates the dopaminergic system, on GH and PRL secretion in 15 normal subjects, 18 patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and 17 patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. GH levels increased significantly after nom in normal subjects (basal, 0.96 +/- 0.76 ng/ml; peak 4.6 +/- 0.61 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) and patients with hyperprolactinemia, both idiopathic (basal, 1.0 +/- 0.38 ng/ml; peak, 4.2 +/- 1.0 ng/ml; P less than 0.05) and tumoral (basal 0.88 +/- 0.3 ng/ml, peak 6.68 +/- 1.2 ng/ml; P less than 0.01). Peak GH levels higher than 5 ng/ml were observed in 8 of 15 normal subjects, 6 of 18 patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and 8 of 17 patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. PRL levels decreased in response to nom in normal subjects, but not in patients with idiopathic or tumoral hyperprolactinemia. A reduction in plasma PRL levels of at least 30% below the baseline was observed only in two patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and in none of the patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. These results demonstrate that nom does not discriminate between idiopathic and tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Since nom probably requires a hypothalamic pool of dopamine to bring about its GH stimulatory effect, the suggestion that the lack of a PRL-lowering effect of the drug is attributable to a dopamine deficiency is not supported by our data.

Macroprolactinomas: CT evaluation of reduction of tumor size after medical treatment.

Thirty patients with macroprolactinomas were treated with dopaminergic drugs from a minimum of 4 months to a maximum of 6 years. Tumor size was evaluated with serial CT during treatment; serum prolactin levels and visual fields were also assessed at the same time. Reduction of PRL levels was found in 28 patients of whom 20 also had marked reduction of tumor volume on CT. Two patterns of reduction of size of tumor in relation with time were observed. In one, tumor shrinkage occurred rapidly in the first month and even in the first week after starting treatment. In the other pattern the tumor reduced in size only after some months of treatment. It is proposed that all patients with macroprolactinomas should be treated medically before considering surgery. A radiological diagnostic and research protocol is proposed, including scout views, thin slices, coronal sections, objective measurement of tumor size and density, serial CTs at 7,21,45 days, 6 months and then every year after the beginning of treatment.

Treatment of hyperprolactinemic states with different drugs: a study with bromocriptine, metergoline, and lisuride.

One hundred ninety-one hyperprolactinemic patients (78 women and 13 men; 54 with pituitary macroadenoma, 53 with microadenoma, and 84 with idiopathic disease) were treated for 2 to 48 months with one or two of the following prolactin (PRL)-lowering drugs: bromocriptine, metergoline, and lisuride. All of the three drugs used were highly effective in lowering PRL levels and restoring gonadal function both in females and in males in the majority of patients with either idiopathic or tumorous disease. In poorly responsive patients, increasing the drug doses resulted in further PRL lowering for all the three drugs. Mild side effects were frequently encountered with initiation of drug treatment but spontaneously subsided in most cases; severe side effects, necessitating stopping of the treatment, occurred in only 12 instances, but changing of the drug allowed PRL-lowering treatment to be continued in 11 of them.

Size reduction of macroprolactinomas by bromocriptine or lisuride treatment.

We have administered to 29 patients with macroprolactinoma the dopamine agonists bromocriptine and lisuride for 1-50 months (mean +/- SE, 12.7 +/- 1.8) in order to assess the effects of these drugs on tumor size. Fourteen patients were treated with bromocriptine (dose range, 7.5-20 mg/day), 12 patients were treated with lisuride (0.6-2 mg/day), and 3 patients were given both drugs. Computed tomography performed before and during treatment showed the occurrence of tumor shrinkage in 18 patients (62%), but in no case was a complete disappearance of the tumor observed. In 5 of these patients, it was even possible to document tumor shrinkage within the first month of treatment with low doses of the dopamine agonists, whereas in other patients, tumors shrank only after prolonged treatment with higher doses. Visual field and acuity improved or normalized in 8 of the 13 patients with visual defects; in some cases, the improvement was reported as early as 2 days after the treatment was started. Plasma PRL levels fell in all patients who showed a reduction in tumor size; in 2 other patients, PRL levels were only poorly suppressed, and tumor size remained unchanged. In the remaining patients, PRL levels were lowered without convincing evidence of tumor shrinkage. In considering the high percentage of patients showing tumor shrinkage under medical treatment, we propose a course with dopamine agonists as the first step in the management of patients with macroprolactinomas regardless of the presence of visual impairments.

Effectiveness of the dopamine agonist lisuride in the treatment of acromegaly and pathological hyperprolactinemic states.

We have studied the effects of the chronic administration of the dopamine agonist lisuride (L) in 21 acromegalics (group 1) and in 25 patients with pathological hyperprolactinemia (group 2). Before starting the treatment levels of PRL and/or GH were determined during acute tests with L (0.3 mg po) or TRH (0.2 mg iv). L was given in doses ranging between 0.4 and 2.4 mg/day. GH and/or PRL were determined at monthly intervals, TRH (6 patients of group 1 and 10 of group 2) was repeated during L therapy. In 10 patients of group 1 GH levels were reduced below 10 ng/ml by L therapy; in the remaining patients GH levels were reduced by 50% of the pretreatment values or they were unchanged. The correlation (p less than 0.01) found between GH levels during acute and chronic L administration indicates that GH changes after acute test are predictive of the outcome of the treatment. In all patients PRL was reduced during the therapy to at least 50% of the basal values and in most patients PRL fell to the normal range. No correlation was found between PRL levels during acute and chronic L administration. During the therapy TRH still increased GH levels in most patients whereas it failed to raise PRL. The withdrawal of L was followed by a rapid return of GH to the pretreatment values whereas PRL showed a slower increase. In acromegalics whose GH was lowered by L there was also a marked amelioration of clinical and metabolic parameters. The lowering of PRL was accompanied by the resumption of ovulatory menses even in patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Males reported improvement in sexual performance. An improvement of visual field occurred in 1 patient. In 1 patient with a large prolactinoma serial computerized tomography scans performed during 2 yr of treatment showed a marked reduction of the tumor size.