A Single-Center 10-Year Experience of 180 Transmasculine Patients Undergoing Gender-Affirming Mastectomy While Continuing Masculinizing Hormone Replacement Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming mastectomy is a fundamental step in the transition process of transmasculine patients following the initiation of hormone replacement therapy. Its perioperative management, however, remains underreported and controversial. In this study, a large series of mastectomies in transmen maintaining hormonal therapy is presented. METHODS: Over a 10-year study period, a consecutive series of 180 transmasculine patients undergoing chest masculinizing surgery was evaluated. Demographical and surgical data were collected and analyzed for potential factors influencing outcome. RESULTS: The overall rate of complications was 15.5%. Patients who underwent periareolar incision mastectomy were significantly more likely to develop any type of complication than patients with a sub-mammary incision (28.6% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.045). Hematoma was the most common reason for surgical revision. It occurred significantly more often among the periareolar group (21.4% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.041). Duration and type of hormonal therapy did not differ between patients with or without complications. In a multivariate regression analysis, smoking and type of incision were identified as significant predictors of the all-cause complication rate, whereas the influence of BMI and resection weight diminished after adjusting for confounding factors. CONCLUSION: There is scarcity of information concerning the influence of perioperative hormonal therapy in patients undergoing chest wall masculinization. The observed complication rates-with special regard to hematoma-were comparable to current reports; yet further research is needed to profoundly evaluate this topic and provide evidence-based recommendations for the perioperative management of HRT of transmasculine patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty in Female-to-Male Transsexuals - A Comparison Between Gottlieb and Levine's and Chang and Hwang's Technique.

BACKGROUND: Phalloplasty is a crucial part of female-to-male genital gender-affirming surgery, however, up to date, there is still no standardized phalloplasty technique. AIM: To evaluate the outcome of a single-center series of phalloplasties using the free radial forearm flap variations by Chang and Hwang vs by Gottlieb and Levine on a similar number of transgender patients. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, 45 female to male transgender patients underwent phalloplasty using a neuro-microvascular free radial forearm flap in our department. Twenty patients underwent phalloplasty by the use of the Chang and Hwang design, whereas 25 patients were subjects to a phalloplasty according to Gottlieb and Levine technique. Patients' demographics, procedural characteristics, postoperative complications, and outcome of both groups were retrospectively evaluated and compared with each other. RESULTS: Patients' demographics were similar in both groups. We did not observe relevant differences concerning postoperative complications comparing the two groups, except for the statistically significant lower rate of partial flap necrosis in the Gottlieb and Levine group. No statistically significant risk factors for an increase in complication rate could be identified. Urethral fistulas were the leading cause of revision. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Optimizing a phalloplasty surgical technique and contributing to establish the gold standard in phalloplasty. STRENGTHS & LIMITATION: This retrospective study presents the first comparison between the free radial forearm flap phalloplasty by Chang and Hwang and by Gottlieb and Levine performed at the same department on a similar number of transgender patients published so far. CONCLUSION: The Chang and Hwang design is associated with a lower rate of urologic complications (fistulas, stenosis) while the Gottlieb and Levine design has a statistically significant lower incidence of partial flap necrosis. Future prospective trials are needed to establish the gold standard in phalloplasty. Spennato S, Ederer IA., Borisov K et al. Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty in Female-to-Male Transsexuals - A Comparison Between Gottlieb and Levine's and Chang and Hwang's Technique. J Sex Med 2022;19:661-668.

Multimodal evaluation of donor site morbidity in transgender individuals after phalloplasty with a free radial forearm flap: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: In phalloplasty, there is a lack of standardized follow-up examinations of motor function and strength after harvesting oversized radial forearm free flaps (RFFF). METHODS: We evaluated the donor site of 20 transmen after phalloplasty, using a multimodal, standardized approach, assessing the following parameters: opposition of the thumb, composite range of motion of the finger joints, grip strength, mobility of the wrist, lesion of the superficial branch of the radial nerve, the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve, the sensation of pain, and cold intolerance. The contralateral, nonoperated forearm was used as a control. RESULTS: No impairment of the mobility of the thumb (Kapandji score median 10, range 5-10) or fingers (all fingers at both sides pulp-to-palm 0 cm, nail-to-table 0 cm) were detected. Grip strength (median 36,3kg, p=0.629) and wrist extension (62.5°vs.70°, p=0.357), flexion (70°vs.70°, p=0.535), pronation (90°vs.90°), supination (90°vs.90°), radial (30°vs.30°, p=0.195), and ulnar deviation (40°vs.50°, p=0.125) did not statistically differ between donor and control hand. Injury of the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve was uncommon (0% hypoesthesia, 10% positive Tinel's sign). We did not observe any persistent pain of the donor forearm (NRS median 0, range 0-9). We did observe irritation of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (hypoesthesia 40%, neuroma 45%). CONCLUSION: The harvest of an oversized RFFF for phalloplasty does not cause any significant difference in motor function or strength between the donor and nonoperated hand. A potential risk of injuring the radial nerve branch is to be avoided. An aesthetic impairment could be addressed in future studies.

Tangential Excision of Rhinophyma with the Disposable Razor Blade: Simple and Cost Efficient with Aesthetically Good Results.

Medical therapies for rhinophyma have been described but these only delay progression. Therefore, surgery is the method of choice. Plenty of modalities have been described including cold-knife surgery, electrosurgery, hydrosurgery, laser-assisted treatments, and dermabrasion. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In this two-center study, patients' charts and photodocumentation were analyzed retrospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgery was performed under general anesthesia with an additional local anesthesia of the affected areas of the nose. We removed the hypertrophic tissue in thin layers with a sterile disposable razor blade under constant visual control of the underlying cartilage and adnexal structures. A dressing with Mepithel and gauzes was applied. Patients presented weekly to monitor the wounds. Follow-up was 1 year. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, nine male patients with rhinophyma underwent surgical therapy at AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany and at the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria. The mean age of the patients was 66 years. Mean time to complete re-epithelization equaled 31.5 days. No recurrences were noted within the follow-up period of 1 year. Patients' satisfaction was very high. Only one patient had hypertrophic scars at the wing of the nose and another one developed a superficial fistula without connection to the nasal cavity. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series describing the use of a disposable razor blade for rhinophyma treatment supporting its efficiency described in previous anecdotal publications. We can highly recommend the technique, as it is cost-efficient and simple and provides excellent aesthetic results.

Liposuction treatment improves disease-specific quality of life in lipoedema patients.

This study examined the disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in lipoedema patients undergoing treatment for the condition with liposuction. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients (n = 69) who underwent liposuction for treatment of lipoedema between 2004 and 2019, and gathered data on patient age, body mass index, the number of liposuction sessions, and the amount of fat removed per side. The study also prospectively evaluated the QoL in 20 lipoedema patients before and after liposuction using the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment for lymphatic diseases questionnaire. The mean age was 50.6 ± 12.8 years, and the average number of liposuction sessions performed was 2.9 ± 1.9, with a mean volume of 1868 ± 885.5 mL of fat removed per side. Before treatment with liposuction, disease-specific QoL in patients with lipoedema was low on every single subscale as well as on the global score and showed a significant improvement in all aspects after liposuction. There was a significant correlation between a higher number of liposuction treatment sessions and general health status in lipoedema patients (P = .007). Liposuction greatly improves the QoL in lipoedema patients. A higher number of liposuction treatment sessions seem to have a positive effect on general health status in these patients.

Quality of Patient Information on Lipofilling in the Internet.

BACKGROUND: Patients interested in aesthetic surgery actively search the Internet, a source that contains important but biased information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the quality of patient information on autologous fat grafting available on the Internet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The quantitative and qualitative assessment of websites was based on a modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool (EQIP-36 items). Websites were identified through the most popular search engines (Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask, and AOL). RESULTS: After duplicate and irrelevant sources were excluded, 608 remaining websites were assessed. Only 164 websites addressed >17 of the 36 items. Scores tended to be higher for academic centers and professional societies than for websites developed by private practitioners. The EQIP score achieved by websites ranged between 0 to 28, with a median value of 14 points. CONCLUSION: The quality of patient information on lipofilling available on the Internet is very poor, and research on existing websites reveals substantial shortcomings. There is an urgent need for sources offering superior quality and unbiased information on lipofilling for patients who intend to undergo this procedure.

Microsurgical Phalloplasty in Nontranssexual Patients - Considerations After a Retrospective Single-center Analysis of 23 Cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of a single-center series of penile reconstruction using the radial free forearm flap in rare indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 1993 until September 2016, 23 nontranssexual patients underwent phallic reconstruction by the use of a neuromicrovascular free radial forearm flap in our clinic. Patient-specific characteristics, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated and interpreted. RESULTS: The indications for surgery were: disorders of sex development (34.8%), reconstruction after oncologic surgery (34.8%), automutilation (8.7%), iatrogenic (8.7%), microphallus (8.7%), and 1 case of priapism (4.3%). Two patients (8.7%) had a total flap necrosis and 2 patients (8.7%) had a partial flap necrosis; 3 out of these 4 patients were heavy smokers. Urinary fistulae and strictures were frequent but were successfully managed by urologists in all cases. There was no statistically significant correlation between smoking, comorbidities, number of venous anastomoses, and complications. CONCLUSION: In departments experienced in microsurgery, the goals of penile reconstruction could also be achieved in patients with rare indications by the use of the neuromicrovascular free radial forearm flap. Despite the high rate of postoperative complications, penile reconstruction with the free radial forearm flap yields satisfying results. An intensive cooperation between the plastic-reconstructive team and the urological team is a prerequisite to achieve the best surgical result.