Comparison of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rates between different ICUs: Implications of a zero VAP rate.

OBJECTIVE: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Measures to reduce the incidence of VAP have resulted in institutions reporting a zero or near-zero VAP rates. The implications of zero VAP rates are unclear. This study was done to compare outcomes between two intensive care units (ICU) with one of them reporting a zero VAP rate. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: This study retrospectively compared VAP rates between two ICUs: Utah Valley Regional Medical Center (UVRMC) with 25 ICU beds and American Fork Hospital (AFH) with 9 ICU beds. Both facilities are under the same management and attended by a single group of intensivists. Both ICUs have similar nursing and respiratory staffing patterns. Both ICUs use the same intensive care program for reduction of VAP rates. ICU outcomes between AFH (reporting zero VAP rate) and UVRMC (VAP rate of 2.41/1000 ventilator days) were compared for the years 2007-2008. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: UVRMC VAP rates during 2007 and 2008 were 2.31/1000 ventilator days and 2.5/1000 ventilator days respectively compared to a zero VAP rate at AFH. The total days of ventilation, mean days of ventilation per patient and mean duration of ICU stay per patient was higher in the UVRMC group as compared to AFH ICU group. There was no significant difference in mean age and APACHE II score between ICU patients at UVRMC and AFH. There was no statistical difference in rates of VAP and mortality between UVRMC and AFH. CONCLUSIONS: During comparisons of VAP rate between institutions, a zero VAP rate needs to be considered in the context of overall ventilator days, mean durations of ventilator stay and ICU mortality.

Comparing gatifloxacin and clarithromycin in pneumonia symptom resolution and process of care.

In looking for outcome differences beyond rates of cure, we prospectively compared the symptom resolution, side effects, and processes of care between the use of clarithromycin and gatifloxacin for the treatment of radiographically confirmed community-acquired pneumonia. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label study comparing gatifloxacin monotherapy to clarithromycin alone or combined with ceftriaxone for patients with multiple risk factors. We measured the return to usual activities and symptoms over seven interviews ending 42 days after randomization. Admission and hospital discharge decision support were provided to treating physicians. We enrolled 266 patients over the age of 18 years between September 2000 and June 2003. The groups were similar in age and gender, with a mean age of 53.5+/-19.4 years, and were 54% female. Patient severity as determined by the number of risk factors and the Pneumonia Severity Index was similar between groups; 95% of the patients were low risk. A total of 91% of patients completed at least five of seven symptom interviews. In the clarithromycin study arm, 64% received concomitant therapy with ceftriaxone. We found no significant difference in return to usual activities, pneumonia-specific symptom scores, and 12-item short-form health survey scores. Individual symptom scores were similar except for bad taste and injection site soreness, which were higher in clarithromycin patients. The rates of hospital admission and length of stay were similar. The cost of antibiotic was higher in the clarithromycin group: $257 versus $110 for gatifloxacin. We found that gatifloxacin monotherapy is similar to clarithromycin given with or without ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, except that antibiotic cost, bad taste, and injection site soreness favor the use of gatifloxacin.