RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of processed secondary data for health monitoring of fattening pigs has been established in various areas, such as the use of antibiotics or in the context of meat inspection. Standardized scores were calculated based on several sources of production data and can be used to describe animal health in a large collective of pig units. In the present study, the extent to which these scores are related to different farm characteristics and management decisions were investigated. In addition, slaughter scores were compared with the results of a veterinary examination on the farms. RESULTS: The comparison of the results of the uni- and multifactorial analyses revealed that almost all of the examined factors play a role in at least one of the scores when considered individually. However, when various significant influencing factors were taken into account at any one time, most of the variables lost their statistical significance due to confounding effects. In particular, production data such as production costs or daily feed intake remained in the final models of the scores on mortality, average daily gain and external lesions. Regarding the second part of the investigation, a basic technical correlation between the slaughter scores and the on-farm indicators could be established via principal component analysis. The modelling of the slaughter scores by the on-farm indicators showed that the score on external lesions could be represented by equivalent variables recorded on the farm (e.g., lesions caused by tail or ear biting). CONCLUSIONS: It has been demonstrated that the examined health scores are influenced by various farm and management characteristics. However, when several factors are taken into account, confounding occurs in some cases, which must be considered by consultants. Additionally, it was shown that on-farm examination content is related to the scores based on equivalent findings from slaughter pigs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A Voluntary Human Approach Test (VHAT) was performed in pig pens, and relationships between environmental conditions and welfare indicators were investigated. Five variables were measured in 1668 pens in 214 fattening pig herds in Germany: time until the first contact (touching) between a pig and the person in the pen (TUFC), time until the observer was surrounded by pigs within a radius of approximately two meters, percentage of pigs relative to group size [%] surrounding the observer after 1 min (PPSO), percentage of pigs relative to group size [%] that completely avoided contact with the observer during the entire test period, and how the pigs contacted the observer (Score 0 [no touching] - 3 [biting]). Furthermore, variables indicative of the pigs' environment (e.g., feeding system, ventilation system), management (e.g., number of usable drinkers, number of usable manipulatable materials), and welfare (e.g., tail lesions, ear lesions) were documented. RESULTS: Pigs engaging in more forceful means of contact (nibbling, biting) approached the observer faster than those exhibiting more gentle types of contact (touching). A lower TUFC was associated with more manipulatable materials present, a higher number of drinkers, and with the control position of the caretaker located inside the pen. Pigs kept in larger groups showed a lower TUFC than those in smaller groups (P = 0.0191). However, PPSO was lower in pigs kept in smaller groups (1-12 pigs per pen) with more manipulatable materials available. In groups with low PPSOs, more tail lesions were observed (P = 0.0296). No relationship between contact type and tail or ear injuries was detected. In younger pigs, PPSO was higher (49.9 ± 23.2%) than for animals in the second half of the fattening period (45.1 ± 19.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In this on-farm study, the relationships between VHAT behavior and environmental factors revealed that external factors (e.g., management practices, housing conditions) impact animals' responses to this behavioral test. Therefore, using the VHAT as an animal welfare indicator is valid only if these variables are studied as well.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Interstitial nephritis as a form of renal diseases can be found frequently among pigs. Nevertheless, prevalence and aetiology need to be investigated in more detail as reports about detailed analysis are lacking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study, a total of 169 kidneys of conventionally and organically raised pigs were randomly chosen at slaughter and classified according to the degree of inflammation and the participating inflammatory cells. Moreover, PCV2 as an infectious agent was analysed by immunohistochemistry and in-situ hybridisation. RESULTS: All of the investigated kidneys displayed mild interstitial lesions. Inflammatory cells included lymphocytes, macrophages, plasma cells, eosinophilic and neutrophilic granulocytes. Significant (p ≤ 0.0001) differences concerning the grade of inflammation and inflammatory cell occurrence could be observed between kidneys of conventionally and organically raised pigs. In comparison to conventionally raised pigs organically raised pigs showed significant (p ≤ 0.0001) more frequently a mild form of nephritis as well as a significant (p ≤ 0.0001) more frequent occurrence of lymphocytes and macrophages. In contrast to that, conventionally raised pigs had a significant (p ≤ 0.0001) higher occurrence rate of a mild to moderate form of nephritis as well as a significant (p ≤ 0.0001) higher level in occurrence of lymphocytes, macrophages, plasma cells, and neutrophilic granulocytes when compared to organically raised pigs. PCV2 DNA was detected in the kidney of only one animal. CONCLUSION: Interstitial nephritis was found in conventionally and organically raised pigs and PCV2 was ruled out as a major pathogen for interstitial nephritis in slaughter pigs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because of the high prevalence and unknown cause further investigations are necessary to delineate the clinic relevance of this alteration and its pathogenesis.
