A Randomized Trial of Electrographic Flow-Guided Redo Ablation for Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF).

BACKGROUND: Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping enables full spatiotemporal reconstruction of organized wavefront propagation to identify extrapulmonary vein sources of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: FLOW-AF (A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW [EGF] Algorithm Technology [Ablamap Software] to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) was multicenter, randomized controlled study of EGF mapping to: 1) stratify a nonparoxysmal AF population undergoing redo ablation; 2) guide ablation of these extrapulmonary vein AF sources; and 3) improve AF recurrence outcomes. METHODS: FLOW-AF enrolled persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF)/long-standing PerAF patients undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF maps were recorded from standardized biatrial basket positions. Patients with source activity ≥26.5% were randomized 1:1 to PVI + EGF-guided ablation vs PVI only; patients without sources ≥26.5% threshold were not randomized. Follow-up and electrocardiographic monitoring occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 85 patients (age 65.6 ± 9.3 years, 37% female, 24% long-standing PerAF). Thirty-four (40%) patients had no sources greater than threshold; at least 1 source greater than threshold was present in 46 (60%) (EGF-guided ablation, n = 22; control group, n = 26). Patients with sources were older (68.2 vs 62.6 years; P = 0.005) with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (2.8 vs 1.9; P = 0.001). The freedom from safety events was 97.2%, and 95% of EGF-identified sources were successfully ablated. In randomized patients, AF-free survival at 12 months was 68% for EGF-guided ablation vs 17% for the control group (P = 0.042); freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter at 12 months was 51% vs 14% (P = 0.103), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In nonparoxysmal AF patients undergoing redo ablation, EGF mapping identified AF sources in 60% of patients, and could be successfully ablated in 95%. Compared with PVI alone, PVI + source ablation improved AF-free survival by 51% on an absolute basis. (FLOW-AF: A Study to Evaluate the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW EGF Technology [A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW (EGF) Algorithm Technology (Ablamap Software) to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation]; NCT04473963).

Impact of atrial fibrillation on 1-year outcome in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator: results from the German DEVICE Registry.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac arrhythmia frequently documented in patients requiring implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D). Patients with diagnosed AF at the point of ICD or CRT-D implantation may have an impaired follow-up outcome. Methods: The German DEVICE I-II registry is a nationwide prospective multicentre database of patients implanted with ICD and CRT-D with clinical follow-up data. We analysed a 1-year follow up of implanted patients with AF and with sinus rhythm (SR). Results: A total of 4,929 ICD/CRT patients are included in the present analysis: 946 (19.2%) were in AF and 3,983 (80.8%) were SR at time of device implantation. AF patients had a significantly more comorbid profile including older age {72 [interquartile range (IQR), 66-77] vs. 66 (IQR, 56-73) years; P<0.001}, and higher rate of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (68.2% vs. 61.0%; P<0.001), peripheral artery disease (4.5% vs. 2.7%; P=0.002), diabetes (33.6% vs. 25.5%; P<0.001), hypertension (58.4% vs. 51.1%; P<0.001) and renal failure (22.6% vs. 15.3%; P<0.001). The intra-hospital complication rate was 4.3% in the AF and 3.6% in the SR group (P=0.38). In 1-year follow-up AF patients experienced a significantly higher rate of defibrillator shocks (25% vs. 15.3%; P<0.001). One-year estimated mortality was 10.8% in the AF and 5.9% in the SR group (P<0.001), while estimated 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate was 11.2% vs. 7.0% (P<0.001). The effects of AF on electrical shocks and mortality persisted after adjusting for age, sex, advanced New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic renal failure (CRF), QRS duration, and type of indication for electronic device implantation. Conclusions: Our clinical data on an extended cohort of contemporary patients confirm the significant impact of AF, and its associated comorbidities, upon mortality and major adverse events after implantation of ICD/CRT.

Electrographic flow-guided ablation in redo patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (FLOW-AF): design and rationale.

Background: Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping enables the dynamic detection of functional or active atrial fibrillation (AF) sources outside the pulmonary veins (PVs), and the presence or absence of these sources offers a novel framework for classifying and treating persistent AF patients based on the underlying pathophysiology of their AF disease. Objective: The primary objective of the FLOW-AF trial is to evaluate the reliability of the EGF algorithm technology (Ablamap software) to identify AF sources and guide ablation therapy in patients with persistent AF. Methods: The FLOW-AF trial (NCT04473963) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical study in which patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF who have failed prior PV isolation (PVI) undergo EGF mapping after confirmation of intact PVI. In total, 85 patients will be enrolled and stratified based on the presence or absence of EGF-identified sources. Patients with an EGF-identified source above the predetermined activity threshold of ≥26.5% will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to PVI only vs PVI + ablation of EGF-identified extra-PV sources of AF. Results: The primary safety endpoint is freedom from serious adverse events related to the procedure through 7 days following the randomization procedure; and the primary effectiveness endpoint is the successful elimination of significant sources of excitation with the target parameter the activity of the leading source. Conclusions: The FLOW-AF trial is a randomized study designed to evaluate the ability of the EGF mapping algorithm to identify patients with active extra-PV AF sources.

Randomized evaluation of redo ablation procedures of atrial fibrillation with focal impulse and rotor modulation-guided procedures: the REDO-FIRM study.

AIMS: REDO-FIRM evaluated safety and effectiveness of conventional vs. focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM)-guided ablation of recurrent persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after an initial AF ablation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective, multicentre, randomized study included patients with a single prior AF ablation, but with recurrent AF and reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs). Conventional ablation generally included PV re-isolation; however, additional ablation was permitted per physician discretion. In the FIRM arm, beyond PV re-isolation, basket catheter-based FIRM mapping created dynamic animations of putative rotors, which were targeted for ablation. Between May 2016 and July 2019, 269 subjects were randomized, with 243 subjects completing 12-month follow-up. Ablation beyond re-pulmonary vein isolation, the FIRM vs. Conventional arms did not differ significantly: cavo-tricuspid isthmus -9.0% vs. 15.3%, caval vein isolation -1.5% vs. 0.8%, non-PV trigger -2.2% vs. 3.8%, other -11.9% vs. 13.0%. Single procedure 12-month freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter-recurrence was 63.3% (76/120) vs. 59.0% (72/122) in the FIRM and Conventional arms (P = 0.3503). Efficacy was similar in the paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups (P = 0.22 and P = 0.48). The 10-day and 12-month safety endpoints were achieved in 93.3% vs. 93.8% (P = 0.89) and 88.4% vs. 93.4% (P = 0.22) in the FIRM and Conventional arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In REDO-FIRM, as compared to standard ablation, FIRM-guided ablation did not provide additional efficacy in redo ablation procedures, but FIRM-guided ablation was equally safe. Additional studies are necessary to identify any potential population able to benefit from FIRM-guided ablation.

Selection and outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy: Comparison of 4384 patients from the German Device Registry to randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Registry data add important information to randomized controlled trials (RCT) on real-life aspects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D). This analysis of the prospectively conducted German Device Registry aims at comparing mortality rates, comorbidities, complication rates to results from RCT. METHODS: The German Device registry (DEVICE) prospectively collected data on ICD and CRT-D first implantations from 50 German centres. Demographic data, details on cardiac disease, electrocardiogram (ECG), medication, and data about procedure, complications, and hospital stay were stored in electronic case report forms. One year after device implantation patients were contacted for follow-up. RESULTS: DEVICE included n = 4384 first ICD/CRT-D implantations (29.3% CRT-D devices). We found a strong adherence to guidelines with over 90% of patients being on ß-blocker and ACE-inhibitor medication and adequate QRS width in the majority of CRT-D patients. Patients receiving a CRT-D were older (67.6 ± 11.0 years vs. 63.9 ± 13.4 years, p < .001) and had lower ejection fractions (mean 25% vs. 30%, p < .001) compared to ICD patients. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the predominant underlying heart disease in CRT-D (53.3%), coronary artery disease in ICD patients (64.7%). Compared to RCT our DEVICE patients had more comorbidities (17.9% chronic kidney disease [CKD]) and higher 1-year mortality rates (10.7% ICD group, 12.3% CRT group). In multivariate analysis, CKD patients had an almost 2-fold higher risk of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite relevant limitations of registry data, DEVICE highlights important differences between RCT and real-world registry data and the impact of comorbidities on mortality of ICD and CRT-D recipients.

Catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients with and without structural heart disease: insights from the German ablation registry.

AIM: To compare patient characteristics, safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in patients with and without structural heart disease (SHD) enrolled in the German ablation registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2007 until January 2010, a total of 12,536 patients (37.2% with known SHD) were enrolled and followed for at least one year. Patients with SHD more often underwent ablation for atrial flutter (45.8% vs. 20.9%, p < 0.001), whereas patients without SHD more often underwent ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (30.2% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001) or atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (9.1% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation procedures were performed in a similar proportion of patients with and without SHD (38.1% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.21). Overall, periprocedural success rate was high in both groups. Death, myocardial infarction or stroke occurred in 0.2% and 0.1% of patients with and without SHD (p = 0.066). Major non-fatal complications prior to discharge were rare and did not differ significantly between patients with and without SHD (0.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.34). Kaplan-Meier mortality estimate at 1 year demonstrated a significant mortality increase in patients with SHD (2.6% versus 0.7%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with and without SHD undergoing SVT ablation exhibit similar success rates and low major complication rates, despite disadvantageous baseline characteristics in SHD patients. These data highlight the safety and efficacy of SVT ablation in patients with and without SHD. Nevertheless Kaplan-Meier mortality estimates at 1 year demonstrate a significant mortality increase in patients with SHD, highlighting the importance of treating the underlying condition and reliable anticoagulation if indicated.

Efficacy and safety of the GOLD FORCE multicentre randomized clinical trial: multielectrode phased radiofrequency vs. irrigated radiofrequency single-tip catheter with contact force ablation for treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has become increasingly safe and effective with the evolution of single-tip ablation catheters aided by contact force sensing (ST-CF) and single-shot devices such as the second-generation pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) Gold multi-electrode array. The multicentre randomized GOLD FORCE trial was conducted to evaluate non-inferiority of safety and efficacy of PVAC Gold PVI compared to ST-CF ablation for paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint documented AF recurrence ≥30 s was assessed by time-to-first-event analysis after a 90-day blanking period using repeated 7-day Holters. Secondary endpoints include acute success and procedural characteristics. Safety endpoints included procedural complications, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), tamponade, bleeding, and access site complications. Two hundred and eight patients underwent randomization and PVI (103 assigned to PVAC Gold, 105 to ST-CF). Acute success rates were 95% and 97% for PVAC Gold and ST-CF, respectively. At 12 months, AF recurrence was observed in 46.6% of the PVAC Gold group and in 26.2% of the ST-CF group [absolute efficacy difference 20.4% (95% confidence interval, CI 7.5-33.2%), hazard ratio 2.05 (95% CI 1.28-3.29), P = 0.003]. PVAC Gold had significantly shorter procedure and ablation times. Complication rates were 5.7% and 4.9% for PVAC Gold and ST-CF, respectively (P = 0.782). CONCLUSION: In this multicentre randomized clinical trial, ablation with ST-CF and PVAC Gold ablation catheters non-inferiority for efficacy was not met. AF recurrence was significantly more frequent in the PVAC Gold group compared to single-tip contact force group. Both groups had similarly low rates of adverse events. PVAC Gold ablation had significantly shorter procedure and ablation times.

Cardiac glycosides are not associated with increased mortality or hospitalization rates in ICD and CRT-ICD patients after adjustment for baseline-characteristics at one-year follow-up: Results from the German DEVICE registry.

AIMS: Despite lacking supporting randomized trials, cardiac glycosides (CGs) are widely used in heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, several pro- and retrospective studies and registry-data have recently raised serious concerns in terms of efficacy and safety of CGs in this field. We have therefore examined the association between CGs and clinical outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization (CRT-ICD) patients of the large German DEVICE registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2014, 3782 ICD and 1529 CRT-ICD patients were enrolled in the German DEVICE registry. Those two groups were analyzed independently according to medication with or without CGs. After adjustment for patient characteristics, CGs were not significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (HR 1.27, 95%-CI 0.91-1.76, p = 0.162), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR 1.36, 95%-CI 0.98-1.89, p = 0.063), ICD-shocks (OR 1.29, 95%-CI 0.95-1.74, p = 0.104) or the need for rehospitalization in ICD patients at one-year-follow-up. Similar findings were obtained in CRT-ICD patients. Regarding possible determinants for glycoside treatment, atrial fibrillation at enrollment was found to be most strongly associated with the prescription of glycosides in ICD (adjusted OR 3.25, 95%-CI 2.63-4.02) and CRT-ICD patients (adjusted OR 3.17, 95%-CI 2.39-4.19). CONCLUSION: Overall harmful effects of CGs in ICD- and CRT-ICD patients could not be confirmed in DEVICE. Further large and randomized-controlled trials that investigate dose-dependent effects of CGs in addition to contemporary therapy of heart failure and atrial fibrillation are needed.

Efficacy and complications of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation in patients with and without structural heart disease: results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: The impact of structural heart disease (SHD) on safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (AFLU) is unclear. In addition, recent data suggest a higher complication rate of AFLU ablation compared to the more complex atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within our prospective multicenter registry, 3526 consecutive patients underwent AFLU ablation at 49 German electrophysiological centers from 2007 to 2010. For the present analysis, the patients were divided into a group with SHD (n = 2164 [61.4%]; median age 69 years; 78.5% male) and a group without SHD (n = 1362 [38.6%]; 65 years; 70.3% male). In our study, SHD mainly encompasses coronary artery disease (52.6%), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50% (47.6%), and hypertensive heart disease (28.0%). The primary ablation success (97%) and the incidence of major (0.2%) or moderate (1.2%) complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 1.0 and 0.87, respectively). Vascular access site complications (0.6%), AV block III° (0.2%), and bleeding (≥ BARC II: 0.2%) were most common. After a median 562 days of follow-up, we observed a 2.92-fold higher one-year mortality (P < 0.0001) in patients with SHD. Patients' satisfaction with the ablation therapy (72.0% satisfied) was close to the overall subjective tachyarrhythmia-free rate (70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis demonstrates that ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent AFLU in patients with SHD has a comparable, excellent risk-benefit profile in our large "real-world" registry. Mortality rates expectedly are higher in patients with SHD and AFLU compared to patients without SHD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01197638, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01197638.

Distribution and impact of age in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators regarding early complications and 1-year clinical outcome: results from the German Device Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving implantable-cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in clinical practice are often older or younger than in clinical trials. Whether older patients benefit from ICD-therapy in a similar way as younger patients is under debate. The objective of this study was to provide real-world data regarding outcomes with respect to age in a large cohort in the German Device Registry. METHODS: Within the registry data from 50 German centers were collected between January 2007 and February 2014. RESULTS: Our analysis included 3239 ICD patients representing a group of young (28%; group I: < 58 years), intermediate aged (50%; group II: 58-74 years), and elderly patients (22%; group III: 75-92 years). Intergroup comparison of all groups was performed followed by individual comparison vs. group II serving as age-reference group. Procedure-related complications did not differ between all groups. Analysis of the primary endpoint, 1-year all-cause mortality, revealed an increased mortality in the elderly and a decreased mortality in the young cohort vs. the reference group II (group I 2.1%, group II 6.2%, group III 13.2%; p < 0.001). While all-cause rehospitalizations did not differ, we observed a difference in reported device revisions showing more device revisions required in younger patients (group I 8.9%, group II 6.8%, group III 4.0%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One-year mortality was doubled in elderly ICD patients probably due to non-cardiac causes. These results further underpin the need for re-evaluating the primary prevention ICD indication in octo- and nonagenarians. Young patients show lower mortality rates but seem to bear higher risk of device-related complications, which highlights the need for improved measures to reduce device-related complications in the young.

Retrospective analysis of FIRM-guided ablation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation: a single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Ablation of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) is common. Studies indicate that AF recurrence is primarily due to pulmonary vein (PV) re-conduction. This retrospective analysis characterized and evaluated recurrent AF patients using focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM) plus PV re-isolation, with follow up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the repeat ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (consecutive, n = 100) underwent FIRM-guided ablation followed by conventional PV re-isolation for recurrent AF treatment. All FIRM patients had failed one or more conventional ablation procedures (1.4 ± 0.08) for paroxysmal (14%), persistent (15%), and long-standing persistent (71%) AF. Stable rotors were identified in 97/100 patients: 60% in the right atrium (RA) and 82% in left atrium (LA) (mean 1.5 ± 0.8 and 2.1 ± 1.2 per patient, respectively). No correlation was noted between the previous number of ablations, AF duration, or LA diameter to the number of rotors (R2 = 0.0039, R2 = 0.0017, and R2 = 0.006, respectively). In this limited observation, only 22% of identified rotors were associated with proximity to low voltage areas. The 12- and 24-month arrhythmia free rate was 93% (13/14) and 92% (12/13) for paroxysmal AF, 60% (9/15) and 47% (7/15) for persistent AF, and 70% (48/69) and 64% (43/67) for long-standing persistent AF, respectively, after a single FIRM procedure and re-isolation of the veins. CONCLUSIONS: The data show a benefit for FIRM-guided ablation in recurrent AF at 12 months. No correlation was found between rotors and tissue characterization, AF duration, or previous number of ablations, suggesting that rotors may play an independent role in maintaining recurrent AF after prior failed ablation.

[Bridging sectoral barriers with integrative care]. / Mit integrierter Versorgung sektorale Schranken überwinden.

In an international comparison, Germany is in the top group for health care. Not only since the economic burdens of the corona pandemic, however, has there been agreement of the necessity of exploiting the considerable efficiency and effectiveness reserves that also exist in this area. Particularly in the interface area between outpatient and inpatient care, increasingly divergent development paths are beeing discusssed. Despite scientific findings to the contrary, integrative cooperative structures threaten to fall behind.

Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Hypertension-An Analysis from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) constitutes a risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), as well as for thromboembolic and bleeding events. We analysed the outcome after catheter ablation of AF in HTN in a cohort from the prospective multicenter German Ablation Registry. METHODS: Between 03/2008 and 01/2010, 626 patients undergoing AF-ablation were analysed. Patients diagnosed with HTN (n = 386) were compared with patients without HTN (n = 240) with respect to baseline, procedural and long-term outcome parameters. RESULTS: Patients with HTN were older and more often presented with persistent forms of AF and cardiac comorbidities. Major and moderate in-hospital complications were low. At long-term follow-up, major cardiovascular events were rare in both groups. Rates of AF-recurrence, freedom from antiarrhythmic medication and repeat ablation were not statistically different between groups. Most patients reported improvement of symptoms and satisfaction with the treatment. However, patients with HTN more frequently complained of dyspnea of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ II and angina. They were more often rehospitalized, particularly when persistent AF had been diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of AF is associated with low complication rates and favorable arrhythmia-related results in patients with HTN. Residual clinical symptoms may be due to cardiac comorbidities and require additional attention in this important subgroup of AF-patients.

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome of patients with heart failure undergoing ICD and CRT procedures: results from the German Device Registry.

AIMS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has a negative impact on prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The role impact of DM in HF patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices might differ and remains unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of DM on periprocedural complications and clinical outcome in HF patients undergoing ICD or CRT implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within the German Device Registry, data from 50 German centres were collected between January 2007 and February 2014. A retrospective analysis of n = 5329 patients undergoing ICD implantation was conducted. Patients' characteristics, procedural data, periprocedural complications, and post-procedural clinical outcome, including a composite clinical endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MACCE), were analysed. Subgroup analysis were performed for ICD and CRT implantations. Median follow-up was 15.7 (12.9; 20.0) and 16.2 (12.8; 21.2) months in DM and non-DM patients. Of 5329 patients enrolled, n = 1448 (27.2%) had a diagnosis of DM. Within the cohort, 94% of DM and 90% of non-DM patients had a diagnosis of HF. Patients with DM were older, had higher body mass index, and higher rate of cardiovascular comorbidities compared with non-DM patients. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses revealed similar all-over intrahospital periprocedural complication rates in both groups (4.1% vs 3.9%). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed higher all-cause mortality after 1 year (9.0% vs 6.3%; log-rank P = 0.001) with higher MACCE rates (10.0% vs 7.3%; P < 0.001) in the DM group versus non-DM patients. After multivariable adjustment for relevant covariates, the association of DM to MACCE disappeared [HR 1.11 (0.89-1.38)]. Because chronic kidney disease (CKD) was clearly associated with increased 1 year MACCE after multivariate adjustment [odds ratio (OR) 2.11 (1.68-2.64)], a subgroup analysis was performed showing a strong trend towards more perioperative complications in DM patients with CKD [OR 2.16 (0.9-5.21)], while no effect of DM was observed in patients without CKD [OR 0.73 (0.42-1.28)]. CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of periprocedural complications and short-term (1 year) clinical outcome in patients with DM and HF undergoing ICD or CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation was not increased. In contrast, CKD was associated with an increased risk of 1 year MACCE in HF patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with electrical heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: data from the German device registry.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter- defibrillator (ICD) therapy is established for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in different entities. However, data from large patient cohorts with electrical heart disease are rare. Therefore, we investigated these patients as well as patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by analyzing registry data from a multi-center 'real-life' registry. METHODS: The German Device Registry (DEVICE) is a nationwide, prospective registry with one-year follow-up investigating 5450 patients receiving device implantations in 50 German centers. The present analysis of DEVICE focussed on patients with electrical heart disease or HCM who received an ICD for primary or secondary prevention. RESULTS: 174 patients with HCM and 112 patients with electrical heart disease (long-QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy) were compared with 5164 other ICD patients. Median follow-up was 17.0 months. Patients in the control group were significantly older. Of note, overall mortality after 1 year was 1.8% in HCM patients, 6.6% in patients with electrical heart disease and 7.3% in the control group. Patients in the control group presented significantly more severe comorbidities. In contrast to HCM patients and the control group where primary prevention was the major indication for ICD implantation, 77.5% of patients with electrical heart disease received an ICD for secondary prevention. The number of surgical revisions was higher in patients with electrical heart disease. CONCLUSION: Data from the present registry display a surprisingly high mortality in patients with electrical heart disease equivalent to the control group. A high proportion of patients who received an ICD for secondary prevention may be regarded as a major determinant for these results, while severe comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and renal failure are major determinants for mortality in the control cohort.

Single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared to dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator: less is more! Data from the German Device Registry.

BACKGROUND: In patients with high risk for sudden cardiac death the implantation of a defibrillator is an established treatment. However the benefits and risks for patients in accordance to the number of the leads are not clear. Even in the current guidelines a recommendation to this question is missing. We analyzed advantage and disadvantages of single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (VVI-ICD) versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (DDD-ICD) in the prospective German Device Registry. METHODS: The data of 2240 patients who underwent ICD implantation in 45 German Centers between January 2007 and March 2011 were included in a prospective device registry (VVI: n = 1629, male = 1358, EF = 34% ± 13%; DDD: n = 611, male = 491, EF = 35% ± 14%). RESULTS: The in-hospital complications were significantly higher in the DDD-ICD group with higher revision/device complication rates (3.0% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.003) but also higher mortality rate (1.0% vs. 0.1%; p < 0.001). Regarding the adjusted data at 1-year follow-up DDD-ICD caused more device revisions, but no difference in rehospitalization and mortality. CONCLUSION: It is still unclear whether DDD-ICD may be beneficial for patients with preserved sinus and atrioventricular nodal function. Our data show that the decision of the operator to choose a DDD-ICD in these patients must be taken very carefully. By choosing a DDD-ICD the patient is exposed to a significantly higher periprocedural complication rate and higher in-hospital mortality. In absence of relevant bradycardias implantation of a DDD-ICD is not justified.

Symptomatic arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT): results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: In atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), catheter ablation is considered as first-line therapy. Despite high success rates, some patients present with arrhythmia recurrence or develop other types of arrhythmias over time. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of symptomatic arrhythmias after initially successful AVNRT ablation and to analyze their clinical implications in a real-world cohort. METHODS: We included 2,795 patients from the German Ablation Registry undergoing first ablation of AVNRT between 01/2007 and 01/2010. In patients alive at long-term follow-up, patient-specific characteristics and long-term follow-up data were compared between patients with (group A) and without (group B) any symptomatic arrhythmia during follow-up. RESULTS: Symptomatic arrhythmias occurred in 17.2% of patients during a mean follow-up of 678 days after AVNRT ablation. The patients with symptomatic arrhythmias were more often female and suffered from structural heart disease. Arrhythmia occurrence was clinically relevant regarding symptoms and patient satisfaction. Serious adverse events including stroke, transient ischemic attack, pacemaker implantation, as well as continued use of antiarrhythmic medication occurred more often in group A. A second ablation procedure was performed in 26% of symptomatic patients to optimize the symptomatic outcome, whereas cardiovascular events or patient satisfaction were not further improved. CONCLUSION: During long-term follow-up, one out of six patients experienced symptomatic arrhythmias after AVNRT ablation, associated with an increase of serious adverse events. A subset of patients required medical or interventional antiarrhythmic therapy, possibly attributable to the co-existence of other arrhythmias. Screening for arrhythmic and cardiac co-morbidity before and after ablation may support comprehensive therapy planning and outcome.

Determinants of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: the German Device Registry perspective.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, we have focused upon rates and clinical determinants of inappropriate shock (IS) after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in the German Device II Registry. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were included. Three sub-groups were identified: non-shock (NS) included 725 patients (92.6%), IS 24 (3.1%), and appropriate shock (AS) 34 (4.3%). IS patients were younger (AS 68 (58-77); IS 59 (51-68); NS 66 (56-75) years; p = 0.03), had been mainly referred for primary prophylaxis (AS 42.4%; IS 70.8%; NS 67.3%; p = 0.01), had a higher resting heart rate (AS 70 (63-80); IS 80 (71-98); NS 70 (60-81) BPM; p = 0.003), had more often atrial fibrillation (AF) (AS 14.7%; IS 45.8%; NS 18.8%; p = 0.006), and shorter QRS duration (AS 100 (90-120); IS 95 (90-100); NS 120 (98-150) msec.; p = 0.001). VVI-ICD was more common in IS (AS 64.7%; IS 83.3%; NS 49.8%; p = 0.002). At a follow-up of 18.2 months (75% IQR 13.6-22.4), no deaths were observed in the IS group, one (2.9%) in the AS, and 36 (4.9%) in the NS (p = 0.9). At logistic regression, VVI-ICD implantation was the strongest IS independent determinant (OR 5.0; 95% CI 1.6-15.9; p = 0.004) together with age < 70 years (OR 4.6; CI 1.4-14.7; p = 0.009), AF at time of ICD implantation (OR 3.5; CI 1.3-9.1; p = 0.01), and resting heart rate > 70/min (OR 2.8; CI 1.0-7.3; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In a contemporary setting, some specific conditions such as VVI-ICD, younger age, and faster resting heart rates remain important IS determinants after ICD implantation.

Procedural success, safety and patients satisfaction after second ablation of atrial fibrillation in the elderly: results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Aged patients are underrepresented in clinical trials on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). In addition, results of outcomes after repeat ablation in the elderly are lacking. We report the results of first repeat AF ablation procedures of aged patients from a real-world multicenter prospective registry. METHODS: Patients undergoing second AF ablation included in the prospective, multicenter German Ablation Registry were divided in two groups (age > 70 years (group 1) and age ≤ 70 years (group 2)) and analyzed for procedural characteristics and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: 738 patients were analyzed (108 patients in group 1, 630 patients in group 2). Significantly more aged patients had structural heart disease (56 patients (51.9%) vs. 203 patients (32.2%), p < 0.001). The majority of the patients underwent repeat pulmonary vein isolation (101 patients (93.5%) vs. 593 patients (94.1%), p = 0.98). More aged patients underwent ablation of left atrial linear lesions (78.1% vs. 57.3% of all linear lesions, p = 0.027). There was no difference in the occurrence of peri-procedural complications (7 patients (6.5%) vs. 24 patients (3.8%), p = 0.30). Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias was documented in 45/105 (42.9%) and 252/603 (41.8%) patients with available follow-up in groups 1 and 2 after a median of 447 (400; 532) and 473 (411; 544) days (p = 0.84). A comparable amount of patients were asymptomatic or reported symptom improvement after repeat ablation in both groups (80% (80/100) in group 1 and 77% (446/576) in group 2; p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Repeat ablation for AF in elderly patients can be performed with safety and efficacy comparable to younger patients.

Digitalis therapy is associated with higher comorbidities and poorer prognosis in patients undergoing ablation of atrial arrhythmias: data from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Digitalis glycosides are employed for rate control of atrial fibrillation. Recent studies suggested potential harmful effects of digitalis monotherapy and combination with antiarrhythmic drugs. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence and potential impact of digitalis therapy on outcome in patients undergoing catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: The German Ablation Registry is a nationwide, prospective registry with a 1-year follow-up investigating 12,566 patients receiving catheter ablations of supraventricular arrhythmias in 52 German centres. The present analysis focussed on pharmacotherapy in 8608 patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter. Patients receiving digitalis therapy (n = 417) were older and presented a significantly increased prevalence of comorbidities including coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes, and pulmonary disease. One-year mortality was significantly higher in digitalis-treated patients (4.7% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001), most strikingly in patients undergoing ablation of atrial flutter. This effect was maintained after adjustment for important risk factors. Similar results were obtained for as the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleeding (6.6% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001), and non-fatal rehospitalisations (54.1% vs. 45.1%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the present study of patients undergoing catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias, an association of digitalis therapy with increased mortality and an increased rate of other severe adverse events were observed. The results from this 'real-life' registry are consistent with previously published studies. However, whether digitalis therapy promotes a poorer prognosis or may just serve as a marker for this aspect cannot be thoroughly interpreted.