The relationship between self-reported executive performance and psychological characteristics in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Self-reports of cognitive functioning are not always related to objective measures. We examined psychological characteristics of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who underestimate, overestimate or accurately estimate their executive performance. METHODS: The first phase was an inventory of cognitive complaints by means of self-reported (and partner-reported) questionnaires. At the second phase (January-October 2009), 114 of the 128 participants met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and underwent cognitive and neurological assessments. RESULTS: A total of 19% (N = 22) of participants reported subjective executive impairment, whilst 81% (N = 92) reported no subjective executive impairment. Based on Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome-Dysexecutive Questionnaire self-reports, 67% (N = 76) of the participants accurately reported no subjective executive impairment, 14% (N = 16) overestimated, and 15% underestimated (N = 17) their executive performance; 78% of the informants accurately reported no subjective executive impairment, 15% overestimated the patient's executive performance, and 4% underestimated the patient's executive performance. Patients with MS underestimating their executive performance were characterized by more depression (F(2,106 = 12.9, P < 0.001), anxiety (F(2,105) = 7.4, P = 0.001) and psychosocial stress (F(2,103) = 17.8, P < 0.001), more often used the coping style 'disclosure of emotions' (H(2) = 12.1, P = 0.002) than accurate estimators and overestimators and displayed a more passive reaction pattern (F(2,104) = 4.4, P = 0.014) than accurate estimators. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reports of executive performance are generally reliable, but 29% of patients with MS underestimated or overestimated their abilities. It is especially important to identify underestimators as they display underlying psychological problems and dysfunctional coping styles in need of further psychological treatment. Informants are valuable in this respect, but should not be seen as the 'gold standard' to identify cognitive impairment.

Treatment effect modifiers for the patient education programme for Parkinson's disease.

AIM: A recent randomised controlled trial showed significant benefits for Parkinson's disease (PD) caregivers' psychosocial problems and need for help and a trend towards significant improvement of patients' quality of life after participation in the Patient Education Programme for Parkinson's disease (PEPP). Large variations in change scores were found, indicating variation in benefit. The aim of this study was to search for treatment effect modifiers. METHODS: Outcome measures were patients' quality of life [Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-39] and caregivers' psychosocial burden [Belastungsfragebogen Parkinson Angehörigen kurzversion (BELA-A-k)]. Candidate treatment effect modifiers were participants' characteristics and baseline scores on psychological questionnaires (BELA-P/A-k, PDQ-39, EQ-5D, Self-rating Depression Scale) and patients' neuropsychological test scores (Mini Mental State Examination, National Adult Reading Test, Dutch version, Word Test, Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome rule shift, Trail Making Test, Stroop). Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial with 64 patients and 46 caregivers were performed using regression analyses with treatment group interaction terms. RESULTS: No significant modifiers were found for the patients. In the caregiver group, a higher MMSE score of the patient at baseline was found to be a significant predictor of a lower BELA-A-k Bothered by score post-intervention of the caregiver. CONCLUSIONS: A potential predictor of treatment benefit was found for caregivers of PD patients with better cognitive functioning. This study did not find treatment effect modifiers for PD patients: demographics, disease stage and time of diagnosis, cognitive functioning, level of baseline psychosocial burden, participating with or without a caregiver, and caregiver changes did not influence treatment outcome. The PEPP seems suitable for the majority of patients.

An evaluation of the patient education programme for Parkinson's disease in clinical practice.

AIM: The Patient Education Programme for Parkinson's disease (PEPP) was assessed in a recent randomised controlled trial (RCT). In this study, a trend was identified towards significant improvement of patients' quality of life (Qol) as well as a significant reduction of caregivers' psychosocial burden and need for help. This study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the PEPP in clinical practice as compared with the RCT in an academic setting. The second aim is to assess its effectiveness in clinical practice at 6-month follow-up. METHODS: Fifty-five patients and 50 caregivers from nine clinical settings participated in the PEPP consisting of eight weekly sessions of 90 min. Self-report questionnaires were used to assess patients' Qol (PDQ-39) and caregivers' psychosocial burden and need for help (BELA-A-k) at baseline, directly after the programme and at 6-month follow-up. To compare the baseline data and short-term effects, data were used from an RCT study which included 64 Parkinson's disease patients and 46 caregivers. RESULTS: Compared with the RCT control group, significant effects, after Bonferoni adjustment, were found for patients' Qol as well as for caregivers' psychosocial burden and need for help. No significant changes were found between baseline scores compared with 6-month follow-up. Scores returned to baseline levels at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Effects from the RCT study were replicated and the effect on patients' Qol was now significant. However, at 6-month follow-up, scores returned to baseline levels, indicating the need for some form of a booster session.

Caregiver education in Parkinson's disease: formative evaluation of a standardized program in seven European countries.

PURPOSE: The formative evaluation of a standardized psychosocial education program for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and their caregivers. The results of the participation of the caregivers are presented next to the data of the patients. METHODS: Caregivers (n = 137) and patients with PD (n = 151) participated in the 8-week program in separate groups. Measurements were performed on psychosocial problems (BELA-P/A-k), health state (EQ-5D VAS), quality of life (PDQ-39) and depression (SDS) 1 week before and 1 week after the program. Participants rated their mood on a visual analogue scale before and after each session, and they filled in an evaluation questionnaire after the last session. RESULTS: Scores on the BELA-P/A-k improved significantly on the 'bothered by scale' as well as the 'need for help scale'. No improvements were found on EQ-5D VAS, PDQ-39 and SDS. Mood ratings improved significantly after each session. Most participants evaluated the program as positive. Feedback led to improvements in the program, which are incorporated in a final manual. CONCLUSIONS: The program was feasible to run in the different countries. This exploratory study led to improvements in the program and recommendations for further research. A study on the effectiveness of the program is the next step.

The benefits of a standardized patient education program for patients with Parkinson's disease and their caregivers.

The Patient Education Program Parkinson (PEPP) is a standardized psychosocial intervention aiming at improving the health-related quality of life (Hr-Qol) of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and caregivers. A randomized controlled trial was performed to assess its effectiveness. Sixty-four PD patients and 46 caregivers were allocated to either the intervention group (PEPP) or the control group (usual care). The intervention consisted of eight weekly sessions of 90-minute duration. Assessments were performed on psychosocial problems (BELA-P/A-k), Hr-Qol (PDQ-39/EQ-5D) and depression (SDS) at baseline and one week after the end of the PEPP. Participants rated their mood on a visual analogue scale before and after each session. A significant effect for the caregivers on psychosocial problems and need for help was found and a trend for significance for patients' quality of life. Patients' and caregivers' mood improved significantly after each session. This study provides indications that PD patients and caregivers benefit from the PEPP.