Diagnostic issues in the clinical management of pericarditis.

AIMS: To review the current major diagnostic issues on the diagnosis of acute and recurrent pericarditis. METHODS: To review the current available evidence, we performed a through search of several evidence-based sources of information, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Clinical Evidence, Evidence-based guidelines from National Guidelines Clearinghouse and a comprehensive Medline search with the MeSH terms 'pericarditis', 'etiology' and 'diagnosis'. RESULTS: The diagnosis of pericarditis is based on clinical criteria including symptoms, presence of specific physical findings (rubs), electrocardiographical changes and pericardial effusion. Although the aetiology may be varied, most cases are idiopathic or viral, even after an extensive diagnostic evaluation. In such cases, the course is often benign following anti-inflammatory treatment, and management would be not affected by a more precise diagnostic evaluation. A triage of pericarditis can be safely performed on the basis of the clinical and echocardiographical presentation. Specific diagnostic tests are not warranted if no specific aetiologies are suspected on the basis of the epidemiological background, history and presentation. High-risk features associated with specific aetiologies or complications include: fever > 38 degrees C, subacute onset, large pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, lack of response to aspirin or a NSAID. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted diagnostic evaluation is warranted in acute and recurrent pericarditis, with a specific aetiological search to rule out tuberculous, purulent or neoplastic pericarditis, as well as pericarditis related to a systemic disease, in selected patients according to the epidemiological background, presentation and clinical suspicion.

'Idiopathic' pericarditis--the clinician's challenge [nothing is idiopathic].

Reports on the aetiologic distribution of acute pericarditis vary significantly from study to study. We attempted to summarise reports on incidence of different aetiologies of pericarditis and explain the variable range of reported frequencies of different aetiologies. The literature between 1978 and 2005 was reviewed for comparative incidence of acute pericarditis. Reports of more than 50 subjects were included. The most common cause of pericarditis was 'idiopathic' pericarditis (mean: 26.1%), followed by neoplastic diseases (mean: 25.6%) and iatrogenic pericarditis (mean: 16.3%). Each mean had a wide range of 95% confidence interval. In summary, the clinician is confronted by a huge dispersion of reported frequencies of pericarditis aetiologies as a consequence of multiple factors. Recognising specific rare causes of pericarditis, often essential for early diagnosis and successful treatment, means coping with that aetiologic dispersion and its implied probabilities.

Therapy for recurrent acute pericarditis: a rheumatological solution?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a multidrug protocol in recurrent acute pericarditis. We tried also to assess the specific role of colchicine. METHODS: We studied 58 patients (34 males) in the largest monocentric observational study. All patients received prolonged courses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; generally we do not start a corticosteroid in recurrent acute pericarditis, but if a steroid had already been started, we planned a very slow tapering; if necessary azathioprine, hydroxychloroquine, and other immunosuppressive drugs were used; 44 patients (27 males, 61.4%) were treated also with colchicine and 14 patients (7 males, 50%) were not given this drug. RESULTS: After starting our protocol recurrences dropped from 0.48 to 0.03 attacks/patient/month (p < 0.00001) within 12 months and remained at the same level till the end of the follow-up (mean 8.1 years) in the whole cohort. In the 44 patients treated with colchicine recurrences dropped from 0.54 to 0.03 attacks/patient/month (p < 0.00001) within 12 months, and in 14 patients not given colchicine recurrences decreased from 0.31 to 0.06 attacks/patient/month (p = 0.002). In patients treated with colchicine the decrease was significantly higher (0.51) than in patients not taking this drug (0.25) (p = 0.006). Colchicine was discontinued by 16.3% of patients because of side effects. CONCLUSION: A multidrug protocol including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at high dosage, slow tapering of corticosteroid, colchicine, reassurance and close clinical monitoring is very effective in recurrent pericarditis; this improvement is more dramatic in colchicine treated patients, but also patients who do not tolerate it can achieve good control of the disease.

Advanced interatrial block: a classic electrocardiogram.

Interatrial block (IAB; P wave>or=110 ms) indicates conduction delay between the right and left atria. IAB can present as partial or advanced and is denoted on the electrocardiogram (ECG) by bifid or biphasic P waves, respectively, the latter in inferior leads. The importance of IAB cannot be overemphasized due to high prevalence, especially at ages 60 and over, and due to grave associations with atrial flutter and fibrillation as well as congestive heart failure. Thus, we present a classic ECG of the much less common form of IAB, namely advanced IAB, as it serves as an excellent yardstick and teaching tool to help clinicians understand this medical entity thoroughly and to easily recognize this often missed type of block.

Effect of interatrial block on left atrial function.

Interatrial block produces prolonged P-waves due to conduction delay mainly in the Bachmann bundle, the most direct route from right to left atrium. It is prevalent in patients over age 60 with its main clinical significance its association with eventual atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Having demonstrated a mean delay in the onset of active left ventricular filling of 37 msec, we defined the electromechanical abnormality further by measuring left atrial volume at key points in the atrial cycle to produce 10 measurements of left atrial function. Compared to the normal left atrium, interatrial block is correlated with a large, poorly contractile left atrium with a delayed and markedly reduced contribution to left ventricular filling and the kinetic energy with which atrial systole propels blood.

Multiple coronary artery-left ventricular fistulas associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Coronary artery-left ventricular (LV) fistulas are extremely rare and can cause myocardial ischemia from coronary steal. We describe an elderly woman who presented with unstable angina from multiple and extensive coronary artery-LV fistulas. She also had clinical features suggestive of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Association of coronary artery-LV fistulas with HHT has not been reported and can pose a management dilemma in view of the risks of extensive cardiopulmonary surgery and potential complications of myocardial ischemia, stroke, and brain abscess.

Electromechanical dysfunction of the left atrium associated with interatrial block.

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to determine the effect of interatrial block (IAB, P-wave duration >/=120 ms) on left atrial (LA) dynamics. IAB is associated with LA enlargement (LAE). LA dysfunction is associated with decreased left ventricular filling, a propensity for LA appendage thrombus formation, and reduced atrial natriuretic peptide levels. We evaluated LA function in patients with and without IAB matched for LA size. METHODS: Echocardiograms with LA enlargement were analyzed. Twenty-four patients had IAB, and 16 patients without IAB formed the control group. LA volumes, A-wave acceleration times (At), LA stroke volume (LASV), ejection fraction (LAEF), and kinetic energy (LAKE) were calculated. RESULTS: The control group and patients with IAB had comparable maximal LA volume and diameter (P >.05). Patients with IAB had significantly longer At (115 +/- 39 ms vs 83 +/- 24 ms, P <.01) and smaller LASV (7 +/- 5 mL vs 17 +/- 6 mL, P <.01), LAEF (9% +/- 6% vs 25% +/- 8%, P <.01), and LAKE (20 +/- 14 vs 65 +/- 44 Kdyne/cm/s, P <.01). LAKE varied inversely with P-wave duration (r = -0.51, P <.01). P-wave duration and minimal LA volume were independent determinants of LAEF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IAB have a sluggish, poorly contractile LA, and the extent of dysfunction is related to the degree of electrical delay from IAB. IAB should be considered a marker of an electromechanically dysfunctional LA and hence a risk factor for atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure.

Exceptional prevalence of interatrial block in a general hospital population.

BACKGROUND: Interatrial block (IAB: P wave > or = 110 ms) is a strong correlate of left atrial (LA) enlargement and an important predictor of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, notably atrial fibrillation and flutter. It is surprising that, despite its association with arrhythmias and its effects on the electromechanical properties of the left atrium, there is widespread neglect of this common abnormality. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence of IAB in a general hospital population. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the electrocardiograms of 1,000 consecutive adult patients. analyzed for P-wave duration. RESULTS: Our results showed a very high prevalence of IAB (41.1% of patients in sinus rhythm and 32.8% of all patients). As expected, it was more common in patients aged > 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: Given this unusually high prevalence of IAB in hospital patients and its ominous portents (LA enlargement. thrombosis and embolism, arrhythmias), physicians should be aware of its frequency and computer software should be programmed to recognize it.