Differential thrombectomy utilization across hospital classifications in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To determine hospital-level factors associated with thrombectomy uptake. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample was retrospectively queried to determine the total number of thrombectomies performed based on different hospital characteristics. Joint point analysis was used to determine which years were associated with significant increases in the number of high-volume thrombectomy centers (ostensibly defined as >50 thrombectomies/year), thrombectomy-capable centers (>15 thrombectomies/year), and total number of thrombectomies performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine hospital factors associated with having an increased odds of performing thrombectomies, and of being classified as a high-volume thrombectomy or a thrombectomy-capable center. RESULTS: Between 2007-2020 there was a stepwise increase in the number of thrombectomy-capable and high-volume thrombectomy centers in the United States. In 2020, there were a total of 15,705 thrombectomies performed, with 89 high-volume thrombectomy centers, and 359 thrombectomy-capable centers. The number of thrombectomy-capable centers significantly increased after 2011. After 2013 and 2016 there was a significant change in the growth rate of high-volume thrombectomy centers. There was also a significant increase in the total number of thrombectomies performed after 2016. Hospital characteristics that were associated with an increased likelihood of being classified as thrombectomy-capable or high-volume included trauma level 1 and 2 hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2007 and 2020, there was a marked growth in thrombectomy utilization for acute ischemic stroke. This growth outpaced new diagnoses of ischemic stroke, and was driven largely by certain hospital types, with the greatest rises following seminal publications of positive randomized thrombectomy trials.

Clinical and Safety Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy 6 to 24 Hours After Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke With Tandem Lesions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Effect of endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with tandem lesions (TLs) within 6-24 hours after last known well (LKW) remains unclear. We evaluated the clinical and safety outcomes among TL-LVO patients treated within 6-24 hours. METHODS: This multicenter cohort was divided into two groups, based on LKW to puncture time: early window (<6 hours), and late window (6-24 hours). Primary clinical and safety outcomes were 90-day functional independence measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS: 0-2) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), first-pass effect, early neurological improvement, ordinal mRS, and in-hospital and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 579 patients (median age 68, 32.1% females), 268 (46.3%) were treated in the late window and 311 (53.7%) in the early window. Late window group had lower median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, rates of intravenous thrombolysis, and higher rates for perfusion imaging. After adjusting for confounders, the odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (47.7% vs. 45.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.02), favorable shift in mRS (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.76), and sICH (3.7% vs. 5.2%, aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.20-1.56) were similar in both groups. There was no difference in secondary outcomes. Increased time from LKW to puncture did not predicted the probability of 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, for each hour delay) among patients presenting <24 hours. CONCLUSION: EVT for acute TL-LVO treated within 6-24 hours after LKW was associated with similar rates of clinical and safety outcomes, compared to patients treated within 6 hours.

Subcortical infarcts in patients with nonstenotic cervical atherosclerotic disease.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have elucidated a relationship between nonstenotic plaque in patients with cryptogenic embolic infarcts with a largely cortical topology, however, it is unclear if nonstenotic cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) plaque is relevant in subcortical cryptogenic infarct patterns. METHODS: A nested cohort of consecutive patients with anterior, unilateral, and subcortical infarcts without an identifiable embolic source were identified from a prospective stroke registry (September 2019 - June 2021). Patients with extracranial stenosis >50% or cardiac sources of embolism were excluded. Patients with computed tomography angiography were included and comparisons were made according to the infarct pattern being lacunar versus non-lacunar. Prevalence estimates for cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) plaque presence were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and differences in plaque thickness and features were compared between sides. RESULTS: Of the 1684 who were screened, 141 met inclusion criteria (n=80 due to small vessel disease, n=61 cryptogenic). The median age was 66y (interquartile range, IQR 58-73) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 3 (IQR 1-5). There was a higher probability of finding excess plaque ipsilateral to the stroke (41.1%, 95% CI 33.3-49.3%) than finding excess contralateral plaque (29.1%, 95% CI 22.2-37.1%; p=0.03), but this was driven by patients with non-lacunar infarcts (excess ipsilateral vs. contralateral plaque frequency of 49.2% vs. 14.8%, p<0.001) rather than lacunar infarcts (35.0% vs. 40.0%, p=0.51). CONCLUSIONS: The probability of finding ipsilateral, nonstenotic carotid plaque in patients with subcortical cryptogenic strokes exceeds the probability of contralateral plaque and is driven by larger subcortical infarcts, classically defined as being cryptogenic. Approximately 1 in 3 unilateral anterior subcortical infarcts may be due to nonstenotic ICA plaque.