Stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed compared to whole brain radiotherapy after surgery of single brain metastasis: Results from a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if neurological/cognitive function outcomes in patients with resected single brain metastasis (BM) after stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed (SRT-TB) are not inferior compared to those achieved with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS: Patients with total/subtotal resection of single BM were randomly assigned either to SRT-TB (n=29) or WBRT (n=30). SRT-TB arm consisted of 15Gy/1 fraction, or 5×5Gy. WBRT consisted of 30Gy/10 fractions. Neurological/cognitive failure was defined as a decrease of neurological score by one point or more, or a worsening of the MiniMental test by at least 3 points, or neurological death. Cumulative incidence of neurological/cognitive failure (CINCF), neurological death (CIND), and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29months (range: 8-45) for 15 patients still alive. The difference in the probability of CINCF at 6months (primary endpoint) was -8% in favor of WBRT (95% confidence interval: +17% -35%; non-inferiority margin: -20%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, two-year CIND rates were 66% vs. 31%, for SRT-TB and WBRT arm, respectively, p=.015. The corresponding figures for OS were 10% vs. 37%, p=.046. CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of SRT-TB was not demonstrated in our underpowered study. More data from randomized studies are needed for confirmation of the value of this method.

Accelerated hypofractionated thoracic radiotherapy in limited disease small cell lung cancer : comparison with the results of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare accelerated hypofractionated (A-HYPO) radiotherapy (RT) with conventionally fractionated (CF) thoracic RT in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). METHODS: Out of 217 consecutive LD-SCLC patients, treated between 1997 and 2012, 82 received CF-RT (44-60 Gy, 2 Gy/ fraction) sequentially to 4-6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (CHT), and 100 received A-HYPO-RT (42 Gy, 2.8 Gy/ fraction). Forty-two patients (42%) received "early" (before the 3rd cycle of CHT) A-HYPO-RT, and 58 (58%) patients received "late" A-HYPO-RT. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure risk (LRFR) and toxicities were retrospectively evaluated and compared between CF-RT and A-HYPO-RT groups (also separately for "early" and "late" A-HYPO-RT). RESULTS: Median survival times (MST) for CF-RT and A-HYPO-RT were 18 and 24 months, respectively; 3-year OS were 19.1 and 39.4%, respectively (p=0.004). Three-year LRFR in CF-RT was 47.3% and 34.0% in the A-HYPO- RT group (p=0.12). Statistically significant difference in OS (p=0.007) and LRFR (p=0.03) was observed, favoring "early" A-HYPO-RT (MST=27 months, 3-year OS=40.0%, 3-year LRFR=28.4%) over CF-RT. Use of CF-RT (relative risk/RR=1.65, p=0.02) and poor CHT compliance (RR=1.69, p=0.03) were independent prognostic factors for poor OS; "early" start of RT was a favorable although non-significant prognostic factor for LRFR (RR=0.42, p=0.05). No difference in toxicities was observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: A-HYPO-RT results in better outcomes than CF-RT. "Early" A-HYPO-RT provides additional benefit in locoregional control and survival, without increased toxicity. These results indicate the need for a randomized study on the efficacy of A-HYPO-RT.

Definitive radical external beam radiotherapy for rectal cancer: evaluation of local effectiveness and risk of late small bowel damage.

AIM: To present a retrospective analysis of results of definitive radiotherapy for rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients with rectal cancer (32% primary, 61% pelvic recurrence and 7% after R2 resection) who could not be treated with surgery underwent external beam radiotherapy. A median tumour dose of 64 Gy was given with 1.8-2.5 Gy per fraction using 2D or 3D technique. In 46% of patients, concurrent 5-Fu-based chemotherapy was given. The median follow-up was 54 months. RESULTS: Clinical complete response was achieved in 39% of patients. Five-year cumulative incidence of local failure, overall survival and cancer specific survival were 76%, 26% and 30%, respectively. Of 11 patients with local control, in five cases the tumour was larger than 5 cm and in the other five the tumour was fixed. Two patients, regarded as locally controlled had non-progressive tumour without local symptoms at the last follow-up of 54 and 118 months post-radiotherapy. Late toxicity occurred in 22% of patients, all with acceptable severity. There was no bowel obstruction requiring surgery despite that in 18 patients the small bowel dose was >60 Gy to a mean volume of 51 cm(3). CONCLUSION: Definitive radio(chemo)therapy provides a chance for local control even in patients with large fixed or recurrent rectal cancer.

Radiochemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer.

Thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in combination with chemotherapy is an established standard of treatment of limited-disease (LD) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Both types of radiotherapy increase 3-year survival by approximately 5%, as shown in the meta-analyses. There is some evidence that earlier commencement of thoracic radiotherapy for good performance status LD-SCLC patients results in better outcome. Total dose, fractionation type and irradiation volume are still matter of debate. The ongoing Phase III randomized trials aim to answer the question of total dose in LD-SCLC. For PCI, in LD-SCLC a standard dose of 25 Gy in ten fractions should remain a standard, as has recently been demonstrated. The PCI in extensive-disease SCLC improves survival at the expense of worsening of short-term health-related quality of life. There is evidence that consolidation thoracic radiotherapy may be of value in extensive-disease SCLC. The recently initiated prospective trials may answer this question.

Combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC.

The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is considered to be a standard approach for patients with locally advanced, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. The current state of the art of combined radiochemotherapy supported by evidence-based data is presented. As shown in the meta-analyses, the concurrent radiochemotherapy gives a superior outcome in terms of survival compared with sequential delivery of both modalities. This is obtained at the expense of higher toxicity, which makes further intensification of radiochemotherapy challenging. Eligibility of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer for such an approach is limited. The new methods to improve treatment results, such as selection of proper strategies, incorporation of molecular agents into combined treatment and radiotherapy technique modifications are discussed.

The quality of pathological reports of postoperative specimens in rectal cancer: an audit from the Mazovia region.

BACKGROUND: Recently, pathologists have recommended new standards of post operative specimen evaluation in rectal cancer. These new standards include: macroscopic assessment of the quality of surgical excision of mesorectum, microscopic measurement of circumferential resection margin and the assessment of at least 12 mesorectal lymph nodes regarding the presence of metastases. The purpose of our study was to find out whether those standards have been implemented into a routine practice in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of pathological reports of postoperative specimens in 51 consecutive rectal cancer patients who were referred to our institution from 19 hospitals for postoperative chemoradiation between January 2006 and December 2007. Items were audited in pathological reports that were mentioned in the background. RESULTS: Only 14% of pathological reports included the macroscopic assessment of the quality of surgical excision of mesorectum and 57% reported microscopic measurement of circumferential resection margin. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 9, with a range between 0 and 36. CONCLUSION: The quality of pathological reports was unsatisfactory. Actions should be taken on a national level to improve the current situation. There is an urgent need for providing pathologists with adequate guidelines.

Delineation variation of lymph node stations for treatment planning in lung cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the variability among clinicians in the delineation of mediastinal and hilar lymph node stations (LNS) according to the published recommendations in the treatment planning of elective nodal irradiation for lung cancer. METHODS: Nine observers delineated on axial CT scans of five cases the LNS according to the guidelines of the published Atlas. Next, the Volumes of Consensus (VC)--fitting strictly the guidelines--for each LNS and case were collectively defined. Volume of Intersection (VI) as the overlap of the Delineated Volume (DV) for each LNS, case and observer with respective VC was computed. The Concordance Index (CI) for respective LNS and observers was defined as "VI/VC x 100%". The Discordance Index (DI) for respective LNS and observers was defined as "(1-VI/VD) x 100%". RESULTS: Mean values of CI and DI for all observers were 69% and 36%, respectively. For five radiation oncologists who used to work as a team the ways of delineation were similar. The poorest reproducibility was shown for LNS 5, 7, 10R, and 10L. CONCLUSIONS: Although detailed guidelines are used there is still substantial room for improvement. More training in the use of the Atlas is recommended.